It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
First, I know what you meant regarding the colostomy bag, my response was dry sarcasm. I am sorry you missed that.
Originally posted by FalselyFlagged
reply to post by hotbakedtater
Water bag = colostomy bag. In the United States of Amerika you should not be required to carry around your water or die.
If you don't want to buy it, then don't.. But why should you limit the freedoms of another person?
Originally posted by Santh
FalsleyFlagged, I can't but ask what is your agenda here? What purpose do you envision yourself fulfilling here? The article that you listed as a source clearly states that they want to cut down on the use of non-refillable plastic bottles.
They also mention that 17 million barrels of oil is used each year making these non-recyclable bottles. This bill has absolutely nothing to do with taking away freedoms, it only deals with trying to salvage what we have of the earth. You can still buy water in plastic bottles, you just have to buy your water in recyclable bottles.
Originally posted by hotbakedtater
First, I know what you meant regarding the colostomy bag, my response was dry sarcasm. I am sorry you missed that.
Second, what freedoms are limited with this law?
And third, when mocking my country, I prefer the spelling, Uhmurikuh.
ETA. Fourthly, I can see a point of hypocrisy being made, since soda does not seem to be banned.
[edit on 4-5-2010 by hotbakedtater]
Originally posted by Wayne60
not find a way to tax the heck out of it instead of or in addition to banning it.
Anyway, if you think banning non-recyclable bottles is bad, then you may want to see what North Carolina did last year.
Originally posted by InvisibleAlbatross
reply to post by FalselyFlagged
I don't think you know what a colostomy bag is.