Alleged NASA -Affiliated Astronomer Deciphers 'Intelligence' Signal From Nearby Stars

reply to post by nenothtu


Thank you Nenothtu, I'll take a look.
and I'll also type something I've always wanted to... 2nd line!

Guys I was just wondering if your computers get hacked often? I mean neno, you have 1GB of info pertaining this hoax... Pretty important stuff. Wayne has all his papyrus readings and hidden records on his computer... ( ) Pretty important stuff . The thing is Wayne always seems to be getting hacked because as soon as he comes across info, counter intel pro agents are on him. He also claims to have task manager ALWAYS open so that as soon as he sees hotkey.exe come up, he could end the process ( X 10!).

It's all on his facebook. So I was just wondering if any one else gets hacked nearly as much as Wayne... (it seems to be his source of credibility every time he claims to have something important).

Wayne:

My uploads are now being hacked

I run my task manager live with all visible activity and delete hot key exe when it appears

I should've been abed a couple of hours ago. I'll sure be glad to see a "day off" roll around, so I can devote an entire 24 hour period to getting caught up on events occurring around my part time "paid government disinfo agent" job!

The ongoing debate at CC is a fair illustration of how Judy can influence even mods believe that tripe bout ATS being a CIA sponsored disinformation (THAT is the correct term, in English, not "disinfo". In Russian it's "dizinformatziyy", not "dizinfo") site. Blue Angel appears to have fallen for it, even to the point of suspending logical thought.

An example:

Obviously, "ATS INFO AGENT" knows that ATS tracks their members as referenced in his post and, my comment about him/her has absolutely nothing to do with how you believe they're someone who has been following the hoax.

ATS InfoAgent's full post in question was this:

Posted by ATS info agent:

"Judy, you have still been unable to provide any information on how your findings are real, and not, as evidence suggests, a hoax.

Please come onto ATS and debate this with the members who have found holes in your findings, and perhaps you can show them where they went wrong. You will be met with civility and decorum, so long as that is what is shown to ATS members.

It is known that you have been reviewing the ATS thread for the past 7 months (perhaps showing your own infactuation with yourself and the attention being given to you). Undoubtedly, you will see this post (your CC account has not been banned and I hope it remains this way) and take up the offer.

I'm sure Skeptic Guy would even be so kind as to create a special debate forum for you and only ONE other member to debate about these issues at hand (similar to other debates ATS engage in one vs. one). Balls are in your court."

Note that it is addressed to Judy, and no one else. No mention of Gorgonzola in it. Also, notice that nowhere is "tracking" mentioned in it.

"Whut we have he-ah is FAIL-YUH tuh comoonicate" (in my best Strothers Martin accent - which is none TOO good). It's a long leap from "it is known you've been reviewing" to "ATS is tracking you!". Not only is it a long leap, but there is a lot of air and no safety net beneath that leap.

Simple logic dictates that Judy is reading, and responding elsewhere. No tracking needed, nor do I see any mentioned there. For a leap like that to occur, there has to be one of two things present: either a simple inability to comprehend the English language, OR a willful misrepresentation for whatever purpose.

If Judy can infect a presumably level-headed moderator with that bug, WHO is immune? THAT is why it's imperative to not let this hoax, or any of it's myriad branches, go unchallenged wherever they may sprout.

Here's another couple of thoughts:

1) If JUDY were being tracked, and was tracked to CC as "Gorgonzola", would that not implicate Blue Angel in a cover-up, since she so stridently insists that Judy isn't there, yet in nearly the same breath claims that Judy was "tracked" there by ATS? That would be the only logical implication in using the above quoted post as "fact" to support this deranged theory. If that chain isn't admitted, then the post can't reasonably be used as "fact" to support the contention.

2) Gorgonzola has gone inactive at CC for the past several days, which indicates to me the strong likelihood that she has sewn her seeds there, and moved on to another site to plow. If ATS were "tracking" her, wouldn't we already know where the next harangue is at this moment popping up? I for one am wondering where that is, and why my "tracking hound" has failed to provide that information in a timely manner!

Could it conceivably be because there IS NO tracking, and we have to run her to ground the old fashioned way - by working it?

Nah, it's probably a good thing that my request to be able to post there was never granted. I'm not always as calm as Bill, and they might have been forced to "ban" me more times than they have him! (Twice at last count - but somehow he keeps punching through!)

As my conspiracy mind churns, I have to wonder if trying to register under "nenothtu" had anything to do with the authorization e-mail never coming... on the bright side, if that theory were to pan out, they could possibly be in possession of my real-live e-mail address, from which they could garner enough information to have my legal papers served, and we could get that threatened lawsuit on the road!

Stay tuned for the next exciting installment of... "As the Stomach Churns".

Seriously, this latest development is just another extension, another tentacle of Judy and Wayne's "Hoax Heard 'Round the World", demonstrates their willingness to extend it in the face of certain opposition, and the ease with which some folks can be led to buy into it, in defiance of logic.

We should've put on steel drawers for this epic battle.

"No end in sight".

reply to post by Portugoal


Nah, I don't get hacked. Sometimes attempts are made, but it's usually nothing serious. I have detection software (more than one package - have to make sure they don't step on each other, though) that alerts me to attempts and gives me the originating IP, and I take it from there. Most of them originate in China (go figure) and are simple port scans, where they offender is scanning a series of (sometimes millions) of IP addresses just looking for random open back doors - which I don't have. Some come from Eastern Europe (most of mine from that area are from Romania, of all places) and a few from Southeast Asia. None are any sort of real threat to me.

What Wayne and Judy do - or have done so far - is to go after the internet connection itself, rather than the computer, and shut that down. It hasn't really worked out quite right for them twice so far. In both cases they got the wrong connection, hitting innocents (but we know they don't mind hurting innocents, now don't we?) and it got fixed in short order.

Doesn't really matter if they even fry the machine, though, as long as they get the right one, belonging to the right person - me. Everything gets backed up externally every night, to make sure any new stuff is backed up, and periodically updated backups are flung out to the four corners for safekeeping. There are also five 'puters here, two of which are unconnected to any network at all, and can be used as backup machines in the event my primary get zapped. None of the backup computers have any of the backed-up data on them. It's stored on external media, with the working - but fryable - copy on this computer, none of the others have any of it at all.

I've been known to disable computers that have attempted to offend this one by hacking into it, but I won't specify my method here. It's not a very nice thing to do, but if they tried to hack ME first, who are they gonna complain to? It doesn't really damage their computer anyhow, just disables it (pretty severely, but also pretty easily fixable), and I NEVER strike unless struck at first - no matter what the provocation. Matter of fact, they HAVE to try to intrude here first before I can even get the information to attempt a retaliation.

The bit about Wayne sitting and watching for "hotkeys.exe" had me rolling! I think Wayne should get one of his "expert IT friends" to write him a script to search for it in ram every 60 seconds, and if found stop it automatically and zap it from the hard drive! Seems prudent, no? All of the stuff that has tried to infiltrate me has had names like "dfghjm.exe" or "ojvxc.scr" or "wfghjm.dll" or such like. The more interesting ones re-named themselves each time they tried to run, but nearly all had randomly generated names - probably to preclude writing a script to hunt and kill them.

This may sound a bit paranoid, but my business partners & I dont use our computers to surf such sites as ATS for the very reason that we may court hacking. Our personal & business machines often contain commercially sensitive data. We couldn't even afford the legal costs that would be awarded against us for breach of contract, let alone the damages, should we let something leak.
Now, people who are out of pocket to the tune of millions are not likely to take that lying down. Personally, I've had injuries that made walking difficult. I've no desire to find out what recovering from being kneecapped with a pick-axe handle feels like.

I mention this b/c the mobile device I use for such online activities which are more likely to draw flak, including ATS perusal, has been playing up recently. I reach for my TFH b/c this has happened immediately after I was libelled by Judy et al on YouTube. Next week, when I can find the time, I'll have to take it to the shop (I'm no net wizard). I honestly hope that I dont discover that whatever the problem is was caused by a "Light Warrior" b/c I do actually have a legally contracted responsibility to inform certain people if my data security is compromised. I genuinely wouldn't want the likely consequences to have anything to do with me.

reply to post by Portugoal





Just another one of Waynes games, his puffed up ideas of his own importance !!!!!!!!!!

"LOOK AT ME" I'm so IMPORTANT see i need mega security i have discovered

SECRET HIDDEN KNOWLEDGE. Hidden from everyone since time began i have

WRITTEN A BOOK and the ptb are stopping publication? sales? distribution?

I Have to keep my head down CIA, KGB, MI5 and ATS disinformation agents

after me, for all this forbidden knowledge that ONLY i have been privilaged to

unearth, EVERYBODY is out to stop me from divulging this SECRET 'SHOCKING'

knowledge, but you can SEE it on my page www.thehiddenrecords and BUY the book!!!!!

reply to post by Portugoal




P.S. I'm begining to think that Waynes fb friends never leave his fb or use GOOGLE. There

seems to be some sort of inertia and blind acceptance or ' brain washed ' about them all .

Wayne puts up a post which is answered by one or two others agreeing with him then you

get a whole post count of............

Shared x

Wayne your so spiritual

Love and light

Wayne you make my days.........

How wonderful

So glad your my friend xx

With you all the way Wayne

You work so hard for us all Wayne

you are in our hearts

And so on and so on...............................................................................

This thread is still geting a lot of attention for a hoax thread. There are people out there that think this thread was hoaxed on purpose to google bomb the this hoax info... Who knows eh...

kx

Originally posted by purplemer
This thread is still geting a lot of attention for a hoax thread. There are people out there that think this thread was hoaxed on purpose to google bomb the this hoax info... Who knows eh...

kx

Hi purplemer, The attention is caused -due to the squirmings of certain parties not enjoying
the focus on their money-making schemes. This is my personal opinion.

You may of read the entire thread and as you can see, some folk have endeavoured... and failed
to derail the revelation of this hoax. They are certainly not happy bunnies!

Originally posted by purplemer
This thread is still geting a lot of attention for a hoax thread. There are people out there that think this thread was hoaxed on purpose to google bomb the this hoax info... Who knows eh...

kx

The hoaxers would like this thread to die as it then be resurrected in a new plot..... There

are already attempts being made to justify Judys mistake by saying all manner of things such

it was in another area or below UV rays or above UV rays or that the rays bent or the light

signals went over or around or behind or it was sound or it wasnt sound or it was light AND

sound whatever... i'm not technically minded.............but i can spot a lie from a mile off.......





This is not a new hoax............ two years ago a similar one was tried with Blossom Goodchild

Then i bet if you researched there would be another and another and another right back to the

Kalahari and the Lesotho incidents.

reply to post by A boy in a dress

You never see James Bond trudging through the snow in the wee-small hours.

Thats true, but then you never see James Bond having a wee @any hour! I'm guessing he cant be wearing 1 of those racing driver stylee catch bags for his piddle all the time. It'd surely get burst when he kicks someones arse?!

No, he must be subject to the more lamentable aspects of the human condition, just the same as the rest of us. These basic necessities, including emotional needs, Wayne, Judy, Light Warriors, etc, can be readily understood by the simple expedient of reading books. Its amazing what we can discover about each other & ourselves in books. Whats really cool is that reading them not only teaches us about their subject matter, it also familiarises us with good use of language, since publishers have whole departments of people called 'editors' whose job it is to correct linguistic errors.
Its simple: the more you read, the better you get.
Why is it then that both Wayne & Judy make so many errors in their prose? To my mind, it says that either they are so fantastic in their insights that, from an early age, they have had people willing to work to correct such errors, thus never needing to develope the skill themselves, or they never developed the skill b/c nothing either has written has been held to the standards of academia, which would thus blow any pretention to qualifications, or familiarity with those who have such, out of the water.
Hey, I could be wrong & googling them might simply provide links to their piss poor writing on HOAXES b/c they are so fantastic that even google is in on the conspiracy to keep their insights from the world.

Yeah right!

reply to post by Bunken Drum


Wow!
Well said Sir.
Reading many works can also expand our minds, but like most things, we must
possess the disciplines to know what is fact and what is fiction.
We can dabble in so-called fantastical theorising and I believe that's okay, but
without researched evidence to back-up the theory, it's just musing aloud.

One certainly can't build up a belief system on such whimsical foundations.

Edit: I have never seen Sean Connery 'spend a penny' regardless of what the
poor tabloids reported.

reply to post by purplemer


Hello Purplemer,

This hoax has nearly died many times, BUT, something always brings it back life !

I do not think that the hoaxers of this thread, namely James/Judy and Wayne ( BOMA's ) banked on

how much TRUTH and HARD CONCRETE EVIDENCE that cannot be REFUTED has been brought

to this Thread by many ATS participants.


























soutered- mislead lie misrepresent falsify beliefs delude hoodwink

You know, when Lady Sambucca, SolarFlare and the like were commenting on this
thread, it seemed at times, like banging your head against a brick wall -when asking
for calm civil debate. We asked for evidence in the melee of their rantings and were
of course, unsuccesful.

Anyone recognise this sort of behaviour?

My Way Or Highway

reply to post by A boy in a dress




Yes that attitude did strike me awhile back. But in my naiveity i thought i was being a bit touchy,

after all a Moderator like a Referee is supposed to be impartial..................isnt he???????

Originally posted by eletheia
reply to post by A boy in a dress

 

Yes that attitude did strike me awhile back. But in my naiveity i thought i was being a bit touchy,
after all a Moderator like a Referee is supposed to be impartial..................isnt he???????

Yes, he... and the waves of macho negativity indicates it is a male, just seems to have an agenda
that only slightly involves SkepticGuy. His insistence on demanding that the subject should leave
his site, tells me he wants its there...nay, needs it there and I for one, think that the civilty here
would certainly 'mature up' his website.

Originally posted by A boy in a dress
Anyone recognise this sort of behaviour?

My Way Or Highway

I went, I saw & I nearly came with laughter!

Authored by Blue Angel @CC
Nice chatting with you, but you've been banned for several reasons.

None of which I care to address.

But, I will, just so you know.

Cause I'm fair and balanced.

One.

You speak in circles.

Two.

You attempt to detract from yourself by accusing me of that which is false.

You have insinuated that I edited my post to make it appear as if that is the reason you are unable to address my questions about how your forum (ATS) believes that the Simpson's predicted 911 and a "false flag" attack which didn't occur.

FYI, I edit my posts for grammatical reasons.

My post remains as clear as it did when I first posted it, edited or not, and, so, too, do the questions I inquired of you which you have not answered.

Further, don't come onto this forum thinking you can trump me by insinuating you have some insight into to an "editing" time sequence stamp.

Ain't gonna happen.

Later, pal.
Last edited by BlueAngel : 11-24-2010 at 08:54 PM.

Linky in BIADs quote above.
I'm no grammar expert. Perhaps someone who is will come along to enlighten us, but in the meantime I'm saying this version of BAs post is grammatically no better or worse than the original which I quoted earlier in this thread.
What is certain is that BAs edit occurred after I characterised the original as a monument to stupidity. Imo, BA has done the Wayne/Judy-ish thing of going back to attempt to make themselves look less foolish by editing that which they have editorial control over.
How daft must someone be to be caught out doing exactly what they claim they aren't in that very post?
The playgrounds I grew up in had unforgiving surfaces which a "pillock" could expect to meet hard for dishonourable behaviour.

reply to post by Bunken Drum


Can you explain this better to me? I rarely come this thread. I'm surprised all of you still comment of this thread. Just my own opinion.

Originally posted by Romantic_Rebel
reply to post by Bunken Drum

 

Can you explain this better to me?

Over @Club Conspiracy, there is a libelous thread accusing ATS of being controlled by the CIA for disinformation purposes on the grounds that ATSers have debunked Judy Faltskog's UV signal HOAX, Wayne Herschel's preposterous theories & both of their lies.
Bill, ATS site owner, known here as SkepticOverlord & @CC as TheSkepticGuy, has been calmly, rationally debunking this claim. This has drawn the attention of a CC super moderator called Blue Angel who cannot or will not discuss the subject logically, but doesn't mind being arrogant, telling us s/he doesn't know or care about this HOAX which generated the accusations against ATS & behaving with a degree of petulance rarely seen outside a childrens playground.
I dont think BA is Wayne or Judy, but its very curious that his/her behaviour is similar to that which Wayne/Judy defenders have employed in the past. That similarity prompted me to quote the original unedited version of the above post by BA near the top of pg184 of this thread & describe it as a monument to the stupidity required for a HOAX to gain traction in the 1st place, since it displayed a woeful lack of logic. Sometime later BA went back & edited the post in an attempt to make it look less stupid.
This is something Bill had accused BA of doing previously, to which the response was that BA edits his/her posts for grammatical reasons. Compare both versions for yourself. The edit has not added any better grammar to the old, so I'm saying BA is lying & what makes it funnier is my having caught him/her doing exactly what they claimed not to be in the very post they claimed not to be doing it!
Attempting to hide the evidence of past stupidity is also something we've seen Wayne, Judy & their defenders do before.

There was also this incident:

Post 1: BA posts.

Post 2: SkepticGuy replies

BA edits post 1 after SkepticGuy replies.

Post 3: BA asks Skeptic Guy why he didn't reply to the specific Simpsons questions asked in Post 1. However, the edit time stamp indicates that BA added the Simpsons line of questioning after SkepticGuy's reply.

Post 4: SkepticGuy outs BA as editing his post which is why he didn't reply to the Simpsons line of questioning.

Post 5: BA gets mad that SkepticGuy would point that out and laughs the idea off (even though the evidence is still there) and bans SkepticGuy for anti-mod behaviour.