It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
...Today when you hear new agers use physics terms like "dimension", "density", "frequency", "vibration" and the like, they are not using them in the way that science uses them....
Originally posted by slank
In math theory there are infinite dimensions.
In our everyday perceptual world there seem to be 3 spacial dimensions and then time. Einstein adds another geometric [warping] dimension as gravity.
Black holes are said to have infinite density. Hawkings says they decay given sufficient time, of course time is said to slow to zero at its core so i don't know how one calculates that.
Originally posted by IAmD1
Because they are using the same terms but mean totally different things by them there can not be a valid discussion between the two schools of thought and perhaps we are missing out on some great discoveries/discussions because of it?
Just me thinking out loud again now on to reading page 2 ....
Originally posted by true-life
I was wondering this for a long time. I finally came across it in "Anna Hayes" material.
One density = 3 dimensions (1,2,3)
There are 5 densities (5 X 3 dimensions)
The first 12 are physical like our bodies.
Originally posted by Bedlam
Thus do you end up with things like that HAARP thread the other day, with the mystic guys trying to conflate physics papers with the word "frequency" in, and mystic concepts also using the word "frequency", and making a total hash out of it, and thinking they'd discovered some new truth. When in fact, none of the mystic side guys actually knew what frequency meant, in the physics terminology.
Originally posted by Bedlam
reply to post by IAmD1
Physics doesn't use time as a dimension any more, it's more a condition of the space in which the dimensions exist.
Originally posted by IAmD1
Originally posted by Bedlam
reply to post by IAmD1
Physics doesn't use time as a dimension any more, it's more a condition of the space in which the dimensions exist.
Thanks for clarifying that. Are there any other conditions that the space could have? (to make it even easier to understand) Or can space only have one condition which is time?