It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I think you like to argue with me!
A few name changes here and there and you have a similar story.
Hey, I'm not saying that anyone is right or wrong, my friend.
I am clearly stating the OP is about Noah's Ark and the story is based on Ararat.
This is all based on belief. Yours or mine.
Just like the pyramids from all over the world are similar. NOT EXACT. Hmm...
So are these stories.
Originally posted by okbmd
Why would he need to put whales and sharks in the boat ?
As for the cheetahs , Noah and Flash Gordon were homeboys ...
Originally posted by sirnex
reply to post by havok
I think you like to argue with me!
Not really, I just like to clarify erroneous information as I don't like seeing people being misinformed or misled.
It's more than just name changes. It's place, extent, survivor numbers, methodology of how the floods were initiated, deities involved, time periods involved, etc. Your doing nothing more than attempting to make various mythologies fit the Judaic-Christian religion which is really a conglomeration of all these older mythologies.
Here's something you said to another poster:
"They found a big boat. That big boat is called an ARK. "
Sounds as if your favoring one version of the story that also happens to be the most recent version of an older story told by the ancient Sumerians.
Found! Noah's Ark.
Regardless of what the website linked to says, doesn't make it what it's claimed to be. This is what, the fiftieth 'Ark' that's been found? How many more Arks will be found after this hoax?
That's akin to saying because everyone first built dirt huts, there must have been a world wide civilization. Then people upgraded to stone round houses or pit houses, must be attributed to a world wide civilization. a FEW civilizations built temples out of a SIMPLE shape, must have been a world wide civilization. Some have flood mythologies, must have been a world wide flood that wiped out this world wide civilization.
By the way, they(?) haven't found 50 arks. That's erroneous.
They keep researching the same one. On the same Mountain.
In the same country, with the same name.
post by Freeborn
And yes , you are right ., what about all the fresh-water fish ?
And what about the sasquatch and yeti ? How'd he wrestle those buggers into a box ?
The whole tale of gathering two of each is nothing more than a fable . It would be impossible to fit all those creatures onto a boat that was built according to the dimensions given in the bible .
Originally posted by okbmd
Was just having a little fun , no offense intended .
And yes , you are right ., what about all the fresh-water fish ?
.
Erroneous...what? The link clearly states they found Noah's Ark.
I gave flood stories from around the world.
If you read them they are similar in the fact they all talk about a devastating flood.
50% of them talk about a flood that wipes out the population of Earth.
Just like the tale you get taught in preschool.
Tell one person the word "apple", let them tell the next person, and the next, etc.
After about 20 people, the word "apple" changes to "orange" or whatever.
I am not disagreeing with you.
No, I am clearly stating what the OP states. They found the ARK.
This headline says:
Found! Noah's Ark.
What do you mean regardless? That's the entire subject of this thread!
Again, this could very well be a [HOAX].
I am not denying that.
See below.
No that's akin to saying that all pyramids built around the world are similar.
And they are.
Ergo, the people might have originated from the same place, 1,000's of years before, and migrated all over the world.
We honestly don't know. Or do you and you're not telling me
By the way, they(?) haven't found 50 arks. That's erroneous.
They keep researching the same one. On the same Mountain.
In the same country, with the same name. Hmm....
Theory one is the ancient land of Urartu. Since Masoretic Hebrew had no vowels, the Genesis text would have read that the Ark rested upon the mountains of “rrt” (Ararat). Assyrian text mentions a northerly subdivision of Armenia near the Araxes river was known as Urartu in antiquity, likewise spelled “rrt” in Hebrew. Urartu is known to have existed from about the late 13th century BC to the 9th century BC as a loose federation of tribes. However, there is no evidence that Urartu existed in the 15th century BC when Moses wrote Genesis. Indeed, no one really knows where Moses was referring to when he wrote that the Ark rested on the mountains of “Ararat”.[3]
Mount Ararat may be the largest single-mass or volume mountain in the world as it is huge (one really has to see it in person to appreciate its immensity) and rises to 17,000 feet from the plains surrounding it at 2,000-3,000 feet while most other large mountains are in a mountain range with less differential and base circumference. Ararat has only a few native trees growing on it in Ahora village, shrubs around Korhan, and several small forests on Little Ararat.
"the ark rested on the top of a certain mountain in Armenia ... However, the Armenians call this place, αποβατηριον 'The Place of Descent'; for the ark being saved in that place, its remains are shown there by the inhabitants to this day. Now all the writers of barbarian histories make mention of this flood, and of this ark; among whom is Berosus the Chaldean. For when he is describing the circumstances of the flood, he goes on thus: "It is said there is still some part of this ship in Armenia, at the mountain of the Cordyaeans; and that some people carry off pieces of the bitumen, which they take away, and use chiefly as amulets for the averting of mischiefs." Hieronymus the Egyptian also, who wrote the Phoenician Antiquities, and Mnaseas, and a great many more, make mention of the same. Nay, Nicolaus of Damascus, in his ninety-sixth book, hath a particular relation about them; where he speaks thus: "There is a great mountain in Armenia, over Minyas, called Baris, upon which it is reported that many who fled at the time of the Deluge were saved; and that one who was carried in an ark came on shore upon the top of it; and that the remains of the timber were a great while preserved. This might be the man about whom Moses the legislator of the Jews wrote." (I.3.5-6, trans. William Whiston)
Originally posted by sirnex
reply to post by havok
Yes you are. I'm saying it's not Noah's Ark and your saying it is.
No, I am clearly stating what the OP states. They found the ARK.
This headline says:
Found! Noah's Ark.
That's quiet sad when one can't even argue in context of their own argument. You need to grow up instead of cherry picking even your own argument and twisting it to suit and entirely different purpose.
Are you arguing against the veracity of the archeological record? If your not then you might want to reconsider that utter pitiful statement you just made.
Gen.8-19: Every beast, every creeping thing, and every fowl, and whatsoever creepeth upon the earth, after their kinds, went forth out of the ark.
Gen.8-20: And Noah builded an altar unto the LORD; and took of every clean beast, and of every clean fowl, and offered burnt offerings on the altar.
Gen.8-19: And all living things, and cattle, and creeping things that creep upon the earth, according to their kinds, went out of the ark.
Gen.8-20: And Noe built an altar unto the Lord: and taking of all cattle and fowls that were clean, offered holocausts upon the altar.