It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by DogsDogsDogs
I hope you didn't take my post as somehow being opposed to the Arizona law, ZZombie. The opposite is true.
Sen. John McCain defended his state's controversial immigration
law, arguing Monday on the Senate floor that Arizona needed to
approve the tough new measure to ensure the safety of its citizens.
"This situation is the worst I've ever seen," declared McCain.
"If you don't like the bill - the legislation that the legislature
passed and the governor signed in Arizona, then carry out the
federal responsibilities, which are to secure the border."
Originally posted by boondock-saint
UPDATE:
Sen. John McCain just endorsed this law on the US
Senate Floor.
Sen. John McCain defended his state's controversial immigration
law, arguing Monday on the Senate floor that Arizona needed to
approve the tough new measure to ensure the safety of its citizens.
"This situation is the worst I've ever seen," declared McCain.
"If you don't like the bill - the legislation that the legislature
passed and the governor signed in Arizona, then carry out the
federal responsibilities, which are to secure the border."
politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com...
I didn't think it needed it's on thread since it
was related to this one
Originally posted by ChrisF231
I think it's time for a 6th branch of the military: the United States Border Guard Service
- would absorb the existing US Coast Guard and US Border Patrol into a single agency with both military and law enforcement status. The maritime branch would basically continue to operate as the US Coast Guard does today. The land branch would operate in squad and platoon size mobile patrols via foot, horseback (bring back the horse cavalry in a mounted infantry role) vehicle (inc armored personnel carriers and infantry fighting vehicles), and helicopter and in company sized defensive positions with several regimental combat team sized units situated some miles behind the actual border for quick reaction forces or for dealing with rogue Mexican Army units that "accidentally" cross the border.
Originally posted by DeltaBravoSierra
Obama simply does not want to. Granted this has been an issue for many many years and feel free to throw some blame on Bush and Clinton, but Obama actively cut many Boarder Patrol agents positions, and even went as far to call the new Arizona immigration bill, misguided. Stating among other things that the new immigration bill "threatens to undermine basic notions of fairness that we cherish as Americans."
I think the best way to deal with this is a hidden electronic frontier that blends in naturally with the plants in that region. Post signs that it is there, and warn them, but hide the devices that detect their movements and wireless report it.
Originally posted by PennyQ
Wouldn't it be cheaper all round for each state to build a bloody great wall along the border?
You'd still have to deal with illegal flights, but it would stop most of the problem.
Any aircraft flying illegally over the wall should be just shot down, same as here in australia, we can't build a wall but I bet if we sunk a few illegal boats they would soon stop coming.
Radical I know but is there any other viable option?
A country must defend it's borders and it's about time the governments of the world got some balls and stopped listening to the 'goody twoshoes, whinging dogooders' who are the cause of many, many of our modern societal woes.
Build a wall, shoot anyone trying to get over it, they'll soon stop trying and then their own countries government will have to 'wake up' and do something about the reasons why these people are illegally running off to a so called better life. (which in most cases it isn't)
I expect to be flamed for this, but I for one am tired of the 'soft approach' and 'political correctness' .