It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by RizeorDie
reply to post by hippomchippo
did you invade the middle east? LOL
Originally posted by hippomchippo
Originally posted by RizeorDie
Originally posted by hippomchippo
Originally posted by RizeorDie
since you invaded the middle east. get out of the middle east then you have the full right to do as you wish...
and also since you allowed muslims in you're country...
I didn't invade the middle east.
And once again, it's your, not you're.
And I don't see how you can be so quick to cop out the one freedom that is essential to liberty.
But wait, let me get this straight, because america is stationed in afghanistan, we're not allowed to draw pictures of mohammed?
[edit on 24-4-2010 by hippomchippo]
english is not my first language and i'm happy enough that i can write and speak it, so you dont have to be an english school teacher about it.
you didnt invade the middle east?
now let me get this straight, just because it says you can doesnt mean you have to mr english teacher rofl
I like how you ignored the majority of my post and simply talked about grammar issues, please, answer my question, because america is stationed in afghanistan, we're not allowed to draw pictures of mohammed? And why are you so quick to give up your freedom of speech?
Originally posted by RizeorDie
reply to post by hippomchippo
did you invade the middle east? LOL
Originally posted by RizeorDie
Originally posted by hippomchippo
Originally posted by RizeorDie
Originally posted by hippomchippo
Originally posted by RizeorDie
since you invaded the middle east. get out of the middle east then you have the full right to do as you wish...
and also since you allowed muslims in you're country...
I didn't invade the middle east.
And once again, it's your, not you're.
And I don't see how you can be so quick to cop out the one freedom that is essential to liberty.
But wait, let me get this straight, because america is stationed in afghanistan, we're not allowed to draw pictures of mohammed?
[edit on 24-4-2010 by hippomchippo]
english is not my first language and i'm happy enough that i can write and speak it, so you dont have to be an english school teacher about it.
you didnt invade the middle east?
now let me get this straight, just because it says you can doesnt mean you have to mr english teacher rofl
I like how you ignored the majority of my post and simply talked about grammar issues, please, answer my question, because america is stationed in afghanistan, we're not allowed to draw pictures of mohammed? And why are you so quick to give up your freedom of speech?
i havent given up my freedom of speech, i just dont see the point in making fun/ or drawing images of muhammed...
do you know why muhammed is different?
because unlike other religious figures, not even the muslims draw him. christians and hindus and Buddhist all create idols for thier prophets and gods, but the muslims dont.
if the muslims built a statue of muhammed then maybe then you can too create an art piece off him.
so now answer this question, why do you feel that it is necessary to draw images of muhammed?
Originally posted by hippomchippo
Originally posted by RizeorDie
Originally posted by hippomchippo
Originally posted by RizeorDie
Originally posted by hippomchippo
Originally posted by RizeorDie
since you invaded the middle east. get out of the middle east then you have the full right to do as you wish...
and also since you allowed muslims in you're country...
I didn't invade the middle east.
And once again, it's your, not you're.
And I don't see how you can be so quick to cop out the one freedom that is essential to liberty.
But wait, let me get this straight, because america is stationed in afghanistan, we're not allowed to draw pictures of mohammed?
[edit on 24-4-2010 by hippomchippo]
english is not my first language and i'm happy enough that i can write and speak it, so you dont have to be an english school teacher about it.
you didnt invade the middle east?
now let me get this straight, just because it says you can doesnt mean you have to mr english teacher rofl
I like how you ignored the majority of my post and simply talked about grammar issues, please, answer my question, because america is stationed in afghanistan, we're not allowed to draw pictures of mohammed? And why are you so quick to give up your freedom of speech?
i havent given up my freedom of speech, i just dont see the point in making fun/ or drawing images of muhammed...
do you know why muhammed is different?
because unlike other religious figures, not even the muslims draw him. christians and hindus and Buddhist all create idols for thier prophets and gods, but the muslims dont.
if the muslims built a statue of muhammed then maybe then you can too create an art piece off him.
so now answer this question, why do you feel that it is necessary to draw images of muhammed?
I never said it was necessary, I think we should have the right to draw whatever religious prophet we want, in any scenario we want.
Originally posted by RizeorDie
if the muslims dont draw muhammed themselves then why should that give you the right to draw him?
because of the first amendment?
well there wasnt any muslims in america when that was written and i dont think there was any terrorists back then either.
when times change so does the rules. you cant have the good old america for ever... in fact american society changed so much in the last 40 years that its about time they change the constitutional right...
Originally posted by hippomchippo
Originally posted by RizeorDie
if the muslims dont draw muhammed themselves then why should that give you the right to draw him?
because of the first amendment?
well there wasnt any muslims in america when that was written and i dont think there was any terrorists back then either.
when times change so does the rules. you cant have the good old america for ever... in fact american society changed so much in the last 40 years that its about time they change the constitutional right...
So because some people don't do something neither should I?
Are you proposing that we change the rules of the constitution to force people not to draw pictures of mohammed?
Completely ridiculous.
Originally posted by RizeorDie
Originally posted by hippomchippo
Originally posted by RizeorDie
if the muslims dont draw muhammed themselves then why should that give you the right to draw him?
because of the first amendment?
well there wasnt any muslims in america when that was written and i dont think there was any terrorists back then either.
when times change so does the rules. you cant have the good old america for ever... in fact american society changed so much in the last 40 years that its about time they change the constitutional right...
So because some people don't do something neither should I?
Are you proposing that we change the rules of the constitution to force people not to draw pictures of mohammed?
Completely ridiculous.
no, that change will happen... mr obama is working on it... just awaiting a flase flag...
Originally posted by RizeorDie
reply to post by hippomchippo
its not about muhammed. its about changing the way america operates, all the laws and rights can be changed.... nothing to do with muslims and nothing to do with muhammed. hell when that change happens muhammed will not even cross you're mind...
are you finished?
Originally posted by RizeorDie
reply to post by hippomchippo
its not about muhammed. its about changing the way america operates, all the laws and rights can be changed.... nothing to do with muslims and nothing to do with muhammed. hell when that change happens muhammed will not even cross you're mind...
are you finished?
Originally posted by RizeorDie
reply to post by hippomchippo
if you want to practice you're rights and make fun of muhammed then go for it.
but when upset muslims start blowing things up and killing people then dont say whats wrong with muslims, because clearly you started it knowing it will provoke many muslims.
Originally posted by hippomchippo
Originally posted by RizeorDie
reply to post by hippomchippo
if you want to practice you're rights and make fun of muhammed then go for it.
but when upset muslims start blowing things up and killing people then dont say whats wrong with muslims, because clearly you started it knowing it will provoke many muslims.
No, I didn't start it.
Drawing a picture shouldn't be vengeanced by suicide bombings and killings.
Originally posted by RizeorDie
Originally posted by hippomchippo
Originally posted by RizeorDie
reply to post by hippomchippo
if you want to practice you're rights and make fun of muhammed then go for it.
but when upset muslims start blowing things up and killing people then dont say whats wrong with muslims, because clearly you started it knowing it will provoke many muslims.
No, I didn't start it.
Drawing a picture shouldn't be vengeanced by suicide bombings and killings.
try telling that to the extremist muslims.
edit:
they take simple things very seriously becuase they lack the sense of humour, and they're not afraid to kill themselves whilst taking a few lives with them, they think theres a heaven for them somewhere...
[edit on 24-4-2010 by RizeorDie]