It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
International troops opened fire on a bus carrying Afghan civilians today, killing four people and setting off anti-American protests by furious locals.
Witnesses said the bus, which was travelling in Kandahar province's Zhari district, had pulled over to allow an American convoy to pass when gunfire broke out.
The shooting left another 18 people wounded, 12 of whom were taken to a military hospital.
U.S. Troops Fire on Bus in Afghanistan, Killing Civilians
By RICHARD A. OPPEL Jr. and TAIMOOR SHAH
Published: April 12, 2010
KABUL, Afghanistan — American troops raked a large passenger bus with gunfire near the southern city of Kandahar on Monday morning, killing as many as five civilians and wounding 18, Afghan authorities and survivors said.
The attack infuriated Kandahar leaders and could harm public opinion before perhaps the most important offensive of the war, a campaign that is intended to take control of the Kandahar region from the Taliban this summer.
Hundreds of demonstrators gathered around a bus station on the western outskirts of Kandahar, shouting anti-American chants and blocking the road for an hour, according to people in the area.
The American military confirmed the shooting but there were disputes over details, including whether the troops who fired on the bus had first shot flares and warned the driver to stay back.
One of the bus passengers and a man who identified himself as the driver said that an American convoy about 70 yards ahead of the bus opened fire as the bus began to pull to the side of the road to allow another military convoy traveling behind to pass.
Troops opened fire on the bus just after daybreak as it was taking dozens of passengers to Nimruz Province, said Zalmy Ayoubi, a spokesman for the Kandahar provincial governor.
Some of the wounded were in critical condition, and the death toll could rise, local officials said.
Mr. Ayoubi said five civilians had been killed, including one woman
Passenger Rozi Mohammad, who was interviewed at hospital, said the bus had just left the Kandahar terminal when it pulled over to allow the convoy to take over.
Shooting broke out as the third or fourth American vehicle went by, he said, with gunfire coming from the direction of the convoy.
'They just suddenly opened fire, I don't know why. We had been stopped and after that I don't know what happened,' he said.
Within hours, scores of Afghans had blocked the main highway out of Kandahar city with burning tires, chanting 'Death to America,' and calling for the downfall of Afghan President Hamid Karzai, himself a Kandahar native.
'The Americans are constantly killing our civilians and the government is not demanding an explanation,' said resident Mohammad Razaq.
'We demand justice from the Karzai government and the punishment of those soldiers responsible.'
The shooting came as two suicide bombers attacked an Afghan intelligence services compound in Kandahar, which is the largest city in southern Afghanistan.
Afghan forces shot and wounded one of the attackers, who then detonated his explosives belt.
The second bomber was also killed, although it wasn't clear if he too had blown himself up.
Two intelligence agents and a teacher at a nearby school were injured in the attack, according to Ahmed Wali Karzai, the head of Kandahar's provincial council.
Kandahar was the seat of the Taliban regime ousted in 2001 and insurgents remain active there despite a heavy presence of foreign forces.
Nato is gearing up for long-anticipated allied operation to push the Taliban out of Kandahar, from which the hardline Islamic movement emerged as a political and military force in the 1990s.
Securing it is key to the U.S. military and Nato's aim of turning around the war, but anger stirred by civilian deaths could undercut local support.
Securing it is key to the U.S. military and Nato's aim of turning around the war, but anger stirred by civilian deaths could undercut local support.
The top Nato commander in Afghanistan, U.S. Gen. Stanley McChrystal, has issued strict orders to his troops to try to reduce civilian casualties.
Kandahar spokesman Ayubi said the provincial government strongly condemned the shooting.
Read more: www.dailymail.co.uk...
Nato troops open fire on bus, kill five civilians
KANDAHAR, Afghanistan -- NATO troops opened fire on bus carrying civilians before dawn on Monday morning, killing at least four people and wounding more than a dozen others. NATO said in a news release that four people were killed, including one female. An injured passenger and the bus driver told Canwest News Service the U.S. military was responsible for the shooting, and claimed five people died.
Read more: www.nationalpost.com...
Originally posted by GW8UK
What is the betting that the troops are U.S?
[edit on 12-4-2010 by GW8UK]
Originally posted by System
I think anti-American protests would continue. Sorry, America. You're not very popular.
Originally posted by GW8UK
What is the betting that the troops are U.S?
[edit on 12-4-2010 by GW8UK]
U.S. Troops Fire on Bus in Afghanistan, Killing Civilians
KABUL, Afghanistan — American troops raked a large passenger bus with gunfire near the southern city of Kandahar on Monday morning, killing as many as five civilians and wounding 18, Afghan authorities and survivors said.
---
The American military confirmed the shooting but there were disputes over details, including whether the troops who fired on the bus had first shot flares and warned the driver to stay back.
Originally posted by Nammu
The Taliban was bad, but as least they didn't fire on buses of innocent people just getting out of the way!
Originally posted by Nammu
The Taliban was bad, but as least they didn't fire on buses of innocent people just getting out of the way!
Originally posted by TokiTheDestroyer
reply to post by Nammu
You basically stated that the Talaban never killed any innocents, which is clearly wrong.