It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Thai authorities charge Buddhist monk accused predicting
Correct lottery predictions Thai authorities charge Buddhist monk accused of predicting correct lottery predictions The authorities in Thailand have charged a Buddhist monk alleged to have predicted winning lottery numbers with violating clerical codes. The monk, Phra Khru Sangharak,
news .bbc .co .uk/ 2/ low/ asia-pacific/ 57835 .stm
Wednesday, 18 February, 1998, 13:44 GMT
Thai authorities charge Buddhist monk accused of predicting correct lottery predictions
The authorities in Thailand have charged a Buddhist monk alleged to have predicted winning lottery numbers with violating clerical codes.
The monk, Phra Khru Sangharak, is said to have made correct predictions in eleven straight draws, causing havoc among Bangkok's bookmakers.
Senior monks in Thailand have close links with the government, and a BBC corresondent says the authorities are concerned that his alleged activities will harm the image of Buddhism.
But Phra Khru Sangharak, who faces expulsion from his temple and the monkhood, has denied making any predictions.
He says followers guessed the numbers by looking at wax drippings from candles he uses during ceremonies.
From the newsroom of the BBC World Service
Originally posted by Dock9
I didn't believe I'd be able to find any information about the monk, but after posting the above, thought it was worth at least trying to find further information
LOL. My grip on Time is shaky. The event took place in 1998. Or maybe it's a different news item
Thai authorities charge Buddhist monk accused predicting
Correct lottery predictions Thai authorities charge Buddhist monk accused of predicting correct lottery predictions The authorities in Thailand have charged a Buddhist monk alleged to have predicted winning lottery numbers with violating clerical codes. The monk, Phra Khru Sangharak,
news .bbc .co .uk/ 2/ low/ asia-pacific/ 57835 .stm
Wednesday, 18 February, 1998, 13:44 GMT
Thai authorities charge Buddhist monk accused of predicting correct lottery predictions
The authorities in Thailand have charged a Buddhist monk alleged to have predicted winning lottery numbers with violating clerical codes.
The monk, Phra Khru Sangharak, is said to have made correct predictions in eleven straight draws, causing havoc among Bangkok's bookmakers.
Senior monks in Thailand have close links with the government, and a BBC corresondent says the authorities are concerned that his alleged activities will harm the image of Buddhism.
But Phra Khru Sangharak, who faces expulsion from his temple and the monkhood, has denied making any predictions.
He says followers guessed the numbers by looking at wax drippings from candles he uses during ceremonies.
From the newsroom of the BBC World Service
www.thaipro.com.../2/low/asia-pacific/57835.stm
www.thaipro.com...
Whether divined from snakes' eggs or wax drippings, makes no practical difference
Eleven straight, correct predictions
Proving the future was written. That future is out there. Using various means, some people are able to access that written future --- before it takes places in (take your pick here) 'reality', 'now', 'present', 'our Time'
Wednesday April 01 1998
A BUDDHIST MONK in Thailand faces being disrobed ``if he even hints'' to colleagues what the winning numbers of the next national lottery will be.
Luang Phor Niwet, who has successfully predicted winning numbers, would be banished from his the monkhood and his temple, if he did not desist immediately from his prophesying, the Religious Affairs Department warned yesterday.
Although he had not predicted the full sequence of national lottery numbers, on 15 occasions he has successfully given the last three digits which are the subject of betting in thousands of illegal betting shops.
Lung Phor Nivet has started a cottage industry of lottery handbooks to highlight his predications and every week thousands flock to his temple to see if he will tip them the wink.
He claims he has stopped making his predictions public but sometimes lottery punters jump to their own conclusions when they see how the wax falls from candles forming numbers during his ceremonies.
( The Times, London)
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Originally posted by Zerra
[
Not really at all. Haveyou studied philosophy? Anything with an understanding of how fate works? How on earth can a psychic get a vision about lottery numbers if it is NOT their fate to win it? That was my point. Getting a vision would mean it was their fate- but you said they SHOULD get visions of it- but how can they if it isn't their fate to have it????? That makes nooooo sense.
That's right. It makes no sense. A psychic can presumably foresee predestined events, such as a lottery drawing, but also cannot see it because it's not their "fate"? That is 100% contradictory.
There is no particular evidence of fate, nor predestined events, nor psychic ability. Using an unproven notion such as fate to provide an excuse for the failure of the unproven abilities of psychic powers amounts to an excuse. And arguably the least convincing one so far. Let's see some proof and evidence instead of excuses.
Psychics have gone by many different names throughout history, in ancient history they were considered prophets or seers.
Originally posted by Jim Scott
I saw an interesting video of a dog that would go to the front door within 11 seconds of when his master made a decision to come home from about 500 miles away. I'd call that psychic ability, or some energy we don't understand. Probably something strange going on at a quantum level.
Here's some more on the subject:
boingboing.net...
In four studies done:
1981-Congressional Research Service
1985-Army Research Institute
1987-National Research Council
1989-Office of Technology Assessment
All concluded something interesting was going on.
(including sketpics)
For example, review of the "remote viewing" evidence for the CIA 1995, just as the classified program was becoming unclassified:
Jessica Utts, Prof. of Statistics, UC Davis (she is a world renowned methodologist besides being a statitician, one would think she knows what she is talking about)
Her conclusion was: Using the standards applied to any other area of science, it is concluded that psychic functioning has been well established.
Ray Hyman, Prof. of Psychology, University o Oregon, very well known skeptic
His conclusion was: -free of methodological weaknesses.
-effect sizes...are too large and consistent to be dismisses as statistical flukes....
-----This has been studied in laboratories in a method called Ganzfeld, whole field. Sender/receiver. They use a method to put someone in a near dream state very quickly. Comfy chair under a red light, covering for eyes which are wide open with a red light shining on them so all they can see behind the eye covers is red, and headphones on with white noise. This is to induce a state of visual and auditory hallucinations.
The senders job is to think of something and try and inject those thoughts into the reciever's experience. The reciever is encouraged to speak aloud, to mentate whatever is going on in their minds. The mentation is taken on a one way audio transmission back to the sender revise their mental sending strategy. The target is chosen randomly from a pool of targets which is as different from each other as you can get, ie. rose, microscope, elephant, anchor....If sender sends elephant, and you're lucky, reciever will start talking about big animals, and Africa.
Then you take the receiver out of the room, show them the random topics, of which one, say the elephant was in, and play back what they spoke and then ask them to choose which one best corresponds to their experience.
Random chance is, they will choose the right one 1/4 times.
The chance of getting it right is 1/4. Places ranging from Harvard University, McGill University, Montreal, University of Leningrad, Cambridge University and many others have done this kind of study since 1920's.
The cumulative results of about 3,145 such sessions in in 25 labs is: chance is about 25%, the actual hit rate is about 32%. This is all studies combined, typically of college sophomores, people who are available and interested. But if you look at special populations in particular (creative populations, siblings, high openness, previous experience) the studies that narrow this done have found that their hit rate is not 32%, but its actually 65%....
What happens when people review this data?
Repeatable evidence for telepathy
--1985-Chuck Honorton, one of the principal researchers did an anaylysis and concluded that the results looked like there really was telepathy going on: yes.
--1985-Ray Hyman looked at the same data and he concluded: no.
10 pyschologists and statisticians were asked to comment on both what Hyman and Honorton had concluded. None agreed with Hyman, including 4 who had no previously held opinion about the topic.
--1994-Bem and Honorton: yes
--1999-Milton and Wiseman: yes
--2001-Storm and Ertel: yes
---What happens when skeptical researchers do the sutideis: Finding and Correcting Flawed Research Literatures publishd in the Humanistic Psychologist. After 8 studies they had an overall hit rate of 32% Identical to the overall stats found in the analysis of all test irregardless of subjects. They then concluded that this was "precariously close to demonstrating that humans do have psychic powers."
-Individuals vary, and studies vary in results. But effects are real and even small effects are statistically real in science. He then goes on to talk about two specific examples, a series of studies down about breast implants and connective tissue disease, and aspirin preventing heart attacks. The results were very small but measurable, ie. less than .00% result found in the breast implant and connective tissue disease, but still it was found to be real, therefore these implants were removed from the market. And Aspirin, which prevents heart attacks, but the effect size is really tiny, .03%, but still real enough for Bayer Aspirin to get approval from the FDA to say this and sell aspirin to prevent heart attacks.
Originally posted by truthseeker1984
And some sensitives, like myself, can only see possible outcomes based on what I can see in the person's life.
To be fair though, psychologists, psychiatists, magicians and hell, even salesmen can display similar traits.
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Given these circumstances, how would one claiming psychic ability go about convincng the hardcore skeptic such as myself?
Originally posted by truthseeker1984
But with all of that being said, the EEG's that I had done (which I mentioned in a previous post) showed abnormal patterns while I was reading cards that were in a separate room. My friend said that the findings were still inconclusive, but interesting.