It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Now that is very interesting! Why oh why, if there's nothing to hide, would he not reveal the name of the engineer. You can't just go around saying that somebody predicted that a steel-structured highrise was going to collapse without giving that somebody's name. That is highly suspicious. Especially when that particular somebody predicted the collapse and the approximate time when no steel-structured highrise has ever collapsed from fires before in our entire history.
I may just end up contacting Mr. Hayden myself for my documentary to see if he will release the name of this engineer after all these years.
But Mrs. McClatchey's fame has recently taken a sour turn. The real estate agent has recently become a target of bloggers calling themselves "9-11 researchers," who are seeking to prove that the U.S. government was complicit in the attacks that brought down the Twin Towers, pierced the Pentagon and crashed United Airlines Flight 93. "The End of Serenity" has turned out to be their smoking gun.
The smoke plume doesn't line up right, they say. It is too large in the frame. The smoke is characteristic of an ordnance blast, not a jet fuel fire, further evidence that the government shot down Flight 93. They analyze wind direction, debris patterns and camera trajectories, all in the service of the theory that the crash was faked.
They have visited Mrs. McClatchey's office and called her at home, posting satellite maps of her property and accusing her of digitally altering her photo to insert a fake smoke plume. The bloggers have picked apart her story, highlighting inconsistencies in different news accounts and questioning her motives. Others have described her as "surly," "hostile," "irate" and "defensive." People have called her at home, accusing her of being anti-American and of "holding the photo hostage."
On a simple Google search, Mrs. McClatchey's name now pops up in the same sentence as "total fraud."
"Val McClatchey has made it unmistakably clear to us that she intends to milk her 9-11 claim to fame for all it's worth, truth be damned," writes Lisa Guliani, of WingTV (World Independent News Group), who traveled to Stoystown to interview Mrs. McClatchey.
Read more: www.post-gazette.com...
Originally posted by Joey Canoli
about an engineer that may wish to remain anonymous
Originally posted by hooper
Actually Silverstein said he talked to a "fire department commander" and considering that probably every fire department officer in the FDNY was on site that day, it could of been any one of them.
Originally posted by REMISNE
Originally posted by hooper
Actually Silverstein said he talked to a "fire department commander" and considering that probably every fire department officer in the FDNY was on site that day, it could of been any one of them.
As per usual i see you know nothing about emergency incident command.
Only the fire commander would have been the one talking to Silverstein.
Originally posted by hooper
Right. Prove it. This should be interesting. So no one else associated with the FDNY would have called Silverstein, huh? Only this one guy, right?
Originally posted by REMISNE
Originally posted by hooper
Right. Prove it. This should be interesting. So no one else associated with the FDNY would have called Silverstein, huh? Only this one guy, right?
So are you saying then that the offical story is wrong yet again and that Silverstlen lied when he stated he was talking to the fire commander?
Please try to understand, i know its hard when you do not know anything about emergency incident command but the only person that would have been talking to Silverstein would have been the fire commander. No one else would have the authority to talk to him and give commands
I strongly suggest you do research before posting about something you know nothing about.
Originally posted by hooperAlso, please post those commands that Silverstein was given by the one and only "fire department commander" that was on the scene that day.
Well according to the official story Silverstein stated that the fire commander decided to PULL IT. Meaning the building since the firemen were already out of the building.
And yes there was only one fire commander who that day was in charge of the situation according to even the 9/11 commission.
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
Show the source for emergency incident command procedure that you're using please. It should be a 2001-vintage operating standard as procedures will likely have changed since then.
Perhaps you should also realise that the "Official Story" does not guarantee that everybody tells the truth.
Originally posted by hooper
First, "pull it" does not mean the building, second please explain how informing Silverstein as to their intent to pull the last firefighters out of the building constitute a command to Sileverstein.
So there was only one fire department commander on site that day?
Originally posted by REMISNE
In July 2001, Mayor Giuliani updated a directive titled "Direction and Control of Emergencies in the City of New York." ...
So you would agree then that proper research needs to be to find the facts of what happened.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Second, if you are going to make an extraordinary "prediction" that a steel-structured highrise was not only going to collapse
but when,
when it has never happened before in history
you better damn well be ready to be scrutinized.
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
None of that proves what you claim. Silverstein could have spoken to several different commanders.
Originally posted by hooper
Do you really think on 9/11 they were going strictly by the book? They had hundreds of dead firefighters and you think they were sitting there trying to interpret the proper communication protocol according to your so-called emergency incident pamphlet?
Originally posted by hooper
First, "pull it" does not mean the building,
Originally posted by Joey Canoli
again, you trot out the standard truther canard. pathetic...