There is Something on the Moon!

reply to post by Phage


Ok so now you can help me, you now see what I am referring too...

There are many of these so called changes, from one frame to the next

If you take for instance the AS11 0 degree latittude sequence:

AS11-43-6400 through AS11-43-6410: many of these images are of the same area and repeating imagery shows the "area in question" in another spot.

Now could that be due to changing orbit, and angle of the sun, thus, showing more of what is actually upon the surface?[!]

I have a spread sheet with these things, no matter what it serves best to Look at this complete before dismissing this as just a image processing artifact, etc etc etc.

The reason why I say this, is this "unit" lead me to looking EXTREMELY close at the HR available and lead to other interesting features as well.

here is some hints and suggestions:

ON MAG 41
www.lpi.usra.edu...
AS11-41-6109
AS11-41-6110
AS11-41-6111
AS11-41-6112
AS11-41-6114
AS11-41-6115
AS11-41-6116
AS11-41-6117


ON MAG 42
www.lpi.usra.edu...

AS11-42-6253
AS11-42-6254
AS11-42-6255
AS11-42-6256
AS11-42-6257
AS11-42-6258
AS11-42-6259
AS11-42-6260
AS11-42-6261
AS11-42-6266
AS11-42-6267
AS11-42-6268
AS11-42-6269
AS11-42-6270
AS11-42-6271
AS11-42-6278
AS11-42-6279
AS11-42-6280
AS11-42-6282



ON MAG 43
www.lpi.usra.edu...
AS11-43-6446
AS11-43-6447
AS11-43-6449
AS11-43-6450
AS11-43-6451
AS11-43-6452
AS11-43-6456
AS11-43-6457
AS11-43-6480
AS11-43-6483
AS11-43-6485
AS11-43-6486
AS11-43-6487
AS11-43-6488
AS11-43-6489
AS11-43-6490
AS11-43-6491
AS11-43-6492
AS11-43-6493
AS11-43-6494
AS11-43-6495


So hows that for some data, and more to go!

reply to post by happygolucky


I am reporting my findings, not being biased one way or another, having so many images with the same thing; like having other stars and humans saying OHH there is NO other planets!

Right? I expect people to "deny" this....

Could it be the foot print of a specific type of UFO? Like a crop circle.....but in the moon dust.

reply to post by LordBaskettIV



That is very interesting approach,

awesome!

reply to post by theability

Please refer to 6403, 6404, 6405, and 6406.
In all of these frames the "something" appears at exactly the same point in the horizontal axis (Pixel 1510).

Now look at magazine 42
In 6230 and 6231 it is at 1425. In 6232 it is at 1428. In 6233 and 6234 it is at 1444.

Is it some amazing coincidence that all of the "somethings" appear in the same horizontal location? Is a coincidence that the "somethings" move up the frame roughly the same amount in each subsequent shot? Could the astronaut just happened to have positioned the camera so perfectly to place the "something" so precisely?

Or is it more likely that something is on the scanner (or film path of the camera), getting shifted a bit as each frame is brought into position?

[edit on 4/5/2010 by Phage]

reply to post by Phage

Eh, if they are all in the exact same spot on every image.....I think Phage is right( or close enough). No moon landings of UFO's for us.

reply to post by Phage


Then why is this Only On AS11 mags 41-42-43

Not on any other FLIGHT of Apollo Images

And the Film type is the best to pick out details, 3400 B&W, not a single image of these ON a COLOR MAG.

NOW WHY?

My finding is color resolution isn't quite the detail that it should be.

They used the same scanner right?? Then it should be on all types of film, on all mags...

...see were I am going with this?

Only 3 MAGS of Apollo contain this "image issue".

Being the same flight raises concern, yes, but both FOR and AGAINST this being real.

I am looking at the pixels now.....