Know the Law, or be a Victim of the Law

Hello all, I am writing this post in response to the few self described common law experts who keep saying we are slaves, Common Law isn't real, if you use Common Law they will throw you in prison. I am putting it in Skunk works for lack of a better place.

Thomas Jefferson

1. We, the People are creations of God - NOT creations of government.
2. The RIGHTS of LIFE, LIBERTY, PROPERTY and the PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS are bestowed upon us by our Creator - NOT by government.
3. We, the People create government and install kings, queens, prime ministers or presidents as our servant.
4. As creator of government, we are the "MAJESTY", and government is our servant.
5. When the men and women, acting as members of a SERVANT government, scheme to overthrow the "MAJESTY" of the MASTER and subjugate or destroy the SOVEREIGN PEOPLE, there exists the crime of HIGH TREASON.

From the 1893 Dictionary of Law:

Treason: Betrayal, treachery, breach of faith or allegiance.

Treason may exist only as between allies: it is a general appellation to denote not only offenses against the king and government, but also accumulation of guilt which arises whenever a superior reposes a confidence in a subject or inferior, between whom and himself there subsists a natural, a civil, or even a spiritual relation, and the inferior so abuses that confidence, so forgets the obligations of duty, subjugation, and allegiance, as to destroy the life of the superior.

When disloyalty attacks majesty itself it is called, by way of distinction, high treason, equivalent to the 'crimen loesoe majestatis' of the Romans.

High treason is the most heinous civil crime a man can commit. If indeterminate, this alone is sufficient to make a government degenerate into arbitrary power.

For the following essay, the word "Crown" will be used for the word "Government." We are all, for the sake of argument, British subjects.

The American Government, at all levels, by use of a ["STRAWMAN", a sound alike name of the name by which you have been called all your life, but usually spelled in all capital letters or family name first, and called a "PERSON". The deceit is in the government's (Crown) making the family name as the paramount name, a "surname", where the root word "sur" means over, above, primary, and the given name(s) as a reference name. This is opposite to the intentions of one's parents, and opposite of the origin and status of a "family" name - that being a reference name for the primary, or given names. That fraudulent name is then inscribed on a government money value instrument called a 'birth certificate'. In one's using/acknowledging the birth certificate name as being "one and the same" as oneself, that fraud intended name, it carries with its use, the status of 'plantation slave'. Have a Birth Certificate? We all do, except for some very old people. We are then slaves.

The 'all caps' spelling is a code signifying that the slave has been pledged as a debtor in the bankruptcy of the Crown. All western nations were declared bankrupt in 1930. The deceit by government in teaching people to use the birth certificate name through the educational system makes all Canadians SUBJECT to the CROWN by changing our status to that of a FEUDAL SERF of the MIDDLE AGES. For several hundred years, the British Monarchy bestowed 'privileges' (falsely called rights) on 'subjects' (sometimes called 'citizens'), but this ceased with the 1930 bankruptcy.

Since that time, these 'privileges', including 'due process of law' has been slowly removed, and the 'slaves' have been subjected to increased forced extraction of their labour and life (life is time spent) by way of taxation and inflation of fiat counterfeit money. This is how people have been deprived of the protections of such documents as the Magna Carta 1225, the Habeas Corpus Act, the Bill of Rights, The Petition of Rights, and the Constitution itself.
To George W. Bush, the Constitution is nothing but a "goddamn piece of paper."
(his words, not mine.)

This is a deliberate act of HIGH TREASON against the People of America, as it results in the loss of the Creator bestowed rights of LIFE, LIBERTY and PROPERTY, and the right to a common law court (due process of law).

Learn the facts about the Vatican's and British Crown's continued claimed ownership of the USA; and, their continued collection of 'tribute' from Americans through the Pope's 'Holy Roman Empire'.

Read about this here.www.detaxcanada.org...

The UNITED STATES is a corporation, and Congress is a 'body politic' - both being Roman style incorporations (make-believe ships) under the original creation/ownership of the Pontifex Maximus (Pope) of the (still existent) Holy Roman Empire. All Roman Law documents (so-called constitutions; but, in fact, are 'ship's orders' of make-believe ships), when used as the guide to operate a country under Roman Law, always contain a "notwithstanding" clause (In the US Constitution, it is the 'general welfare' clause). This allows the "captain of the ship", the President, or a designated officer (judge or Cabinet member) leave to disregard any provision of such a constitution at his discretion. 'The CAPTAIN may deviate from ANY 'rules or regulations' when he DEEMS it necessary for the GOOD of the ship.' That is a basic maxim of the Law of the Sea, and totally within the 'common sense' realm of operating a ship relative to safety and profitability; however, it is devastating to the unalienable rights of an individual free will man or woman living upon the land.

Also, it has recently come to light that the court systems operate their admiralty type law within the confines of a 'contract' in all of the British, and former British Empire. The clerk of the court, the prosecuting attorneys, and the judges proffer the contract, and the defendant blindly and ignorantly accepts the offered contract by acquiescence and obedience to court orders and sentences. A defendant convicted and sentenced, even by a jury (in an admiralty/equity court) only need to inform the judge that he/she refuses the offered contract and/or sentence of the judge. As a contracting party, the defendant does not have to accept a contract by imposition against his/her free will. As has happened, when such a refusal of the contract is made, the judge will use legal trickery and bluster to attempt to get the defendant to accept another contract. The defendant need only to continue with: "I do not accept your sentence." Or, where applicable: "I do not accept your offer of contract." The latter statement may be placed upon served court documents and returned (signed and dated) to the clerk of the court.

See, United States Executive Order 10834
GET THAT GOLD FRINGE OFF MY FLAG!
www.apfn.net...

Patriots are subjected to much ridicule when they object to [Admiralty flag] the flag that appears in every government office and courtroom in the land.
That flag is the United States flag... with one seemingly minor cosmetic
difference - a knotted golden fringe on three sides.

Government officials and judges adamantly refuse requests to remove the gold fringed flag and replace it with the constitutional flag of the United States as defined in 4 U.S.C. Section 1,2, and 3 - which has NO fringe.

After the English surrendered at Yorktown, the Articles of Confederation period followed. Then our Founding Fathers implemented the Constitution into this Public Trust, which was the mechanism to provide for us our hopes and aspirations. In the Constitution you will find principles; but, not necessarily those found in the Declaration of Independence.

Note: To learn the reality of the grand deception by the Founding Fathers, read here.www.yale.edu...

Some of the writers of the Constitution thought it was a little too restrictive. It was generally conceded, for instance, that the people had the right to bear arms, but they also knew that if we ever were placed or allowed ourselves to be brought under Maritime Admiralty Law concerning our persons and property, we would have dire need of a guarantee for our rights -- thus, the ten amendments were added to the Constitution, and that became the substantive part of the Constitution. Article III, Section 2, of the Constitution defines the Maritime Admiralty jurisdiction.

How have we been tricked out of our Common Law rights; and, into the Admiralty courts? How has equity as well as Admiralty been corrupted? How has the Federal Government made it almost impossible for us to receive our constitutional rights -- our substantive rights in the Constitution?

(contd.)

Now, to understand the Constitution -- we must examine the Declaration of Independence and those 56 men who signed it, and pledged their lives, liberty, family, property, and their honor to this sacred trust. All of these men were very knowledgeable and learned in the Common Law -- they knew the law because they studied the law, they may not have had a high school education (many of them). But they could read, and they read and studied law. They were men of the age or reason and they knew and they understood. They knew exactly what the king was doing. They knew the law.

Knowledge is a very important, and a dangerous thing. And, as James Madison wrote years ago: "Knowledge will forever govern ignorance, and a people who mean to be their own governors must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives." Education should never be terminal! The First Amendment to the U S Constitution cites "Freedom of Religion" that in actual fact is "Freedom of Education" since the church controlled education, at the time of its writing. America, you are FREE to pursue an Education, why then, do you not do this? Ignorance is no excuse when it comes to the Law. Any Police Officer will tell you that.

Our American Common Law
www.svpvril.com...

As a man, I am sovereign and am not GOVERNED or under the power or guardianship of another or any government.

"In the United States, Sovereignty resides in the people, who act through the organs established by the Constitution." Chisholm v. State of Georgia , 2 US 419 (Dall.), 471; Penhallow v. Doane's Administrators, 3 Dall 54, 93; McCullock v. Maryland, 4 Wheat 316, 404, 405; Yick Yo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356, 370.

The sovereignty of mankind can be seen further in:

"History is clear that the first ten amendments to the Constitution were adopted to secure certain common law rights of the people, against invasion by the Federal Government." Bell v. Hood, 71 F. Supp., 813, 816 (1947) U.S.D.C. -- So. Dist. CA.

I have not granted any power of attorney or other similar instrument to any government or any agent thereof and no governmental agency has power of attorney over me or my property.

It should be noted that no rights are ever "granted" to a man, rather that mankind possess all of their rights. These are not "constitutional rights" but are rather rights possessed by all people. Documents do not grant rights, but simply state what rights are already possessed by mankind. No constitution or other document creates rights, but only state them so as to prevent governments or people from infringing upon those rights. The Constitution for the United States of America states many rights possessed by mankind, but I claim no rights emanating from any constitution or other document. It should be further noted that mankind are the natural people, as mentioned in the Constitution for the United States of America. A man is distinctly different from a "person*."

The Citizens Rule Book
www.geocities.com...
Constitution Society Home Page
[url]http://www.constitution.org/[/img]
Patriot Post
patriotpost.us...
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
www.federalreserve.gov...
DEBT MONEY The debt-money mind virus called a meme is curable with a reality check.
landru.i-link-2.net...
NORFED -- National Organization for the Repeal of the Federal Reserve Act
www.norfed.org...
Banking Offshore & Company Formation (how the Rich Elite get rich, and stay that way)
www.offshoresecrets.com...
Defrauding America A "College" Course on Government Intrigue
www.defraudingamerica.com...
Every Man a King: The Rise and Fall of the Montana Freemen
www.adl.org...
GAALT - Is This the Most Powerful Family and Corporation in the World?
www.freedomdomain.com...
While You Slept Your Congress Took Away Your Constitution
www.jonesreport.com...
A Declaration Of Independence From The Government Of The USA
www.informationclearinghouse.info...
Freeman-on-the-Land - Rod Maynard's Video Channel
www.youtube.com...

So, friends, you have a choice here. either study the Common law for yourself, and be free, or believe what others say about it and be a slave. The choice, as always, is yours alone to make.

My favourite common law video is this one - 'John Harris - it's an illusion'

Common law is the matrix in all its red and blue pill glory. Upon stumbling into it you quickly see the veil of governed corporate consent for what it is.

Great post. Thank you for compiling the info in one place. When I touch upon this subject I am ridiculed as a fool. Time will tell who the fool is. This info needs to become more mainstream!
S&F

I'll give ya two thumbs up and a smile.

[edit on 10-04-08 by Beach Bum]

Thank you for compiling this information.
This is very empowering information.

Legally on paper you're completely right, but the goverment and courts are not following the rules, whats laid out on paper, but operate on a different set of rules that they keep under wraps except in their own circles, and we consequently don't understand what is being done to us.

This is a true court case, in the UK, and even here in North America, the same has been done in some cases, not as many but some. Because it really depended on the integrity and knowledge and even patience of the police that were called.

Note the decision the judge declared making afterwards in writing, was made before the actual court case took place, and this was highly illegal.

vimeo.com...

Very good video. Even if we couldnt pull it off as well here as they did, just seeing this video makes you realize that there are TWO DISTINCT types of law really being used in court. And one isnt legal by anyones constitution!

I also feel we should be doing this locally, bringing awareness by some legal aid type, legal lay people, a non-profit and start small, with traffic tickets.

reply to post by autowrench


Thanks a lot autowrench, I have enough to study!

Thanks, will add to my ever growing list of Common Law study, it looks like we may need it soon. Hopefully.

S&F