It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by endtimer
reply to post by chorizo4
Are we speaking the same language at all? I didn't understand a single
word you said. What sort of communications is this? Mumbo jumbo is
not my style. Take another hit and try to come back to earth.
Most people believe not only that the 19th Amendment permitted women the right to vote but that since women serve in Congress, the courts and other offices of government, the office of president of the United States has been de-genderized.
Not true. This important legal question exists now and has not been constitutionally addressed. The language and syntax of the 19th Amendment merely removed the barriers that prevented women from voting. It did not identify women to be qualified to become elected president.
The language is clear. The 19th Amendment says: "The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex."
We cannot read into the amendment something that is not there. Now, had the amendment said, "The right of citizens of the United States to vote or hold public office shall not be denied," it would have accomplished what the feminists think took place.
The Susan B. Anthony Amendment (as it was then known, because the words were actually drafted by the suffragist in 1875) passed in the House by a vote of 304 to 89. The Senate then passed it, 56 to 25. The text of both the House and Senate deliberately avoided any language that would allow or permit women the right to seek the highest office in the land! It was the considered opinion of senators on both sides of the aisle that if language de-genderized the presidency, the amendment's ratification by the necessary 36 states would be in great doubt.
Today's feminists believe the election process is an evolutionary process, legalized by common practice and that someday a woman will be president. They are convinced that since women have run for the office, the male-gendered presidential office has been neutered .
Not so. They will be challenged, and a Supreme Court ruling on the language will be necessary. At the very least a constitutional amendment to change the language will be required.
www.concordmonitor.com.../20080220/OPINION/802200400/1028/OPINION02
Originally posted by ucalien
reply to post by LadySkadi
reply to post by chorizo4
Okay - ...and that has what to do with Palin, Siamese twins and ET?
What about those ET characters with the earthquake machines, or those other characters, kinda higher up with that doomsday stuff. They have friends and contacts on earth. No I am not kidding.
Still confused.
Yeah, keep paying attention the moron that smoked some pot after left the KKK meeting...
www.nhcaspian.org...
...Dick Marple, a fiery defender of the Constitution. At the public hearing on the bill, he spoke at great length to the injustice of submitting to a de facto National Identification Card...
Originally posted by KINGOFPAIN
and from what overwhelming credentials do you draw your conclusion
that she has the correct state of mind, education,skill and knolwledge to run this country?
Originally posted by whaaa
Sarah would bring religion and GOD into the Whitehorse where it belongs.
Originally posted by endtimer
Well she couldn't be any worse than what we have now. And what
would be bad about Siamese twins being prez? Two heads are better
than one. I know, that was sick. I sorry.