It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
At the end of the first day there was some commotion when the audience noticed the presence of two men and a woman with an exotic appearance. The rumor started that they were disguised Venusians. Those that Adamski had talked about a few hours before.
Martins asked if he could photograph them, but they refused. They were bothered and tired of being called Venusians
Originally posted by TwoPhish
reply to post by Nola213
reply to post by thomas_
I find stories from 'yesterday' and especially our ancient past to be more credible than the ones told and spun today.
There was more of an innocence in yester-years. People didn't have a need to get their 15 minutes of fame like they do today. They told it like it was (or what they believed) and didn't really think of the consequences of being judged. Even as recently as the 1950's-60's.
But now, people have to STOP.......and think twice whether are not they want to share with others that they might've been abducted for example. We're living in very conditional, judgmental and isolated times now.
I think there was more truth yesterday than there is today.
Originally posted by ucalien
reply to post by Arbitrageur
But now that we know that almost nothing can survive on Venus...even our engineered spacecraft can't survive there very long, I can't imagine any rational person still wonders if there's any humanoid beings on or from Venus. Maybe some kind of simple life form like a single-celled extremophile might survive floating in the upper atmosphere where it's cool enough for the water vapor to condense into liquid water? But nothing bipedal can live there I'm pretty sure.
All we know about Venus and our solar system, is information provided AFTER the superpower space running, right?? I mean, these information about planets temperature, density, atmosphere conditions, etc, etc, were gathered due the space researchers of Russia and USA. Do you put your hands on the fire, that 100% of these information are truthful??? I mean, we all know the space agencies have been lying about Mars, Phobos, our moon... We know that there are artificial structures there. Buildings, remains of ancient vehicles, remains of machinery. These facts already were confirmed by retired astronauts and former NASA employees. How can we be so sure that doesn't exist artificial inhabitable structures in Venus, in its underground or above its atmosphere???
Originally posted by ucalien
reply to post by Nola213
Conclusion: Normal people.
Story blown up and out of proportion for any number of reasons. Again if you took an unknown Uma Thurman wearing rediculous long lashes, standing around at a UFO convention, acting odd, she'd draw ALOT of attention ,and over course of 2 days stories would start to build themselves. It's too bad back then they didn't know how hot Venus was.
The fact is that people here act like forensic experts, but they are SPECULATING about her eyelashes and eyelids. Some people here are ASSUMING they are fakes or the tiny balls in the corner of her eyes, are tricks of light and shadow. Nobody here was there, so any affirmation kinda "conclusive", sounds arrogant and even silly.
I noticed, that 95% of the ATSers that posted in this thread, didn't know about this case in Mount Palomar... If I was posted a pic of "Dolores Barrios", in other thread... something related to human biologic anomalies... and named the topic kinda something like "Woman, with double/triple lacrimal glands, from Eastern Europe, was the first case in modern medicine", a lot of people would buy it and research about such anomaly. But once the subject imply to admit the existence of extraterrestrial life and deal with possible weird anatomic characteristics, some people jump to "conclude" it's all about "tricks of light and shadow"...