posted on Mar, 20 2010 @ 10:26 PM
Eh.
Scientists have been saying stuff like this for decades, if not centuries. They always get ahead of themselves, or get a "pie in the sky" dreamy
outlook and create something highly underwhelming, only to brag about it as if it is a fully functional and noteworthy item only conjured up in past
science fiction.
Cloaking, high-tech armor, laser guns, anti-gravity, etc, are a handful of the popular ones where "scientists" say they have achieved the
technology, since the 1950's, but in fact are never anywhere close to it.
Edit:
I should correct myself. Usually, it's a very competent scientist who explains his or her work, amongst his peers, and a journalist butts in and
creates an imaginative and explosive article about it and doesn't stick to reality.
Also, this isn't anything new to be totally honest. There has been armor fitted on tanks and APCs called "reactive armor". It's the same principle
as the cited article, except it uses conventional explosives to repel the round when the armor is struck. High force kinetic vs. kinetic reaction. It
works, but it is expensive, and requires heavy maintenance. This new "electromagnetic reactive armor" is quite dreamy, and I don't see this being
applied anytime in the near future.
[edit on 20-3-2010 by SyphonX]
[edit on 20-3-2010 by SyphonX]