NASA catalog of space anomalies

Surfing on the web I found this article:

Catalog of anomalies

It does not provide its own source and I have not find anything similar in ATS (or anywhere else), so I don't know how reliable may be.

Does anybody have any information about this catalog??

A (short) translation of the article:

Next, is the anomalies catalog created by the people responsible to hide this information from general public. Every code correspond with observation anomalies coming from universities collaborating with the space agency and removed articles from scientific publications (Nature, Science, New Scientist, etc. Next to the code is the reason why such information must be censored. In this moment, we have evidence of all this material. Due to the big amount of information, we only reproduce the codes, and left the analysis for future articles...

Some samples of the codes:

AC COMETS ACB ORBITAL ANOMALIES OF COMETS
* ACB1 The Appearance of Comets in Cycles
* ACB2 Nonrandom Direction-of-Approach of Comets to the Sun
* ACB3 New Comets Have Almost Critical Velocity
* ACB4 Sun-Grazing Comets: The Kreutz Group
* ACB5 Changing Cometary Periods
* ACB6 Jupiter’s Family of Comets
* ACB7 Low-Eccentricity Cometary Orbits
* ACB8 The Scarcity of Hyperbolic Orbits
* ACB9 Cometary Groups
* ACB10 Orbits of New Comets Diverge from Common Point
* ACB11 Excess of Retrograde Long Period Comets
* ACB12 Uranus-Neptune Region Favored as Comet Source
* ACB13 Cometary Perturbations Suggestive of Planet X
* ACB14 Rapid Attrition of the Oort Cloud by Molecular Clouds
* ACB15 Dynamical Improbability of the Oort Cloud

I dont quite understand how is that Low-Eccentricity Cometary Orbits could be a problem??
What does it mean to have low cometary orbits???

AL THE MOON ALB THE MOON’S ORBITAL ANOMALIES
* ALB1 Earth-Moon Instability
* ALB2 Discrepancies in the Moon’s Ephemeris
* ALB3 Nongravitational Forces and Earth-Moon Acceleration Discrepancies
* ALB4 Earth-Moon Acceleration Incompatible with Moon’s Origin in Earth Orbit

I have hear many reasons why the moon may be an anomalous object, but ALB4 is a new one for me.



Well, the list is huge, and maybe every bullet may deserve its own thread.

Does anybody have more information about this codes????


[edit on 19-3-2010 by oshdra]

I wish i could read this for myself it sounds really interesting. Some of the comments after the code dont make any sense in relation to the word comet. I think "comet" its self may be a code word for another annomily. Maybe UFO's but maybe not. Seems they make more sense when you put that before each comment.

I would'nt get to excited about the codes. There probably just references to files on the said event.

Good fing though S nd F

After a two minutes search, this is what I have found.

And remember, an anomaly is only something unexpected by those that consider it an anomaly, it may not be the same to other people.

The list comes from here:
www.science-frontiers.com...

It's a collection of things that William R. Corliss considers noteworthy.

these are anomalies in orbit, gravity and things like that.

Not "see these pixels here well that is a tank, and that rock its a zombie ALIEN ROCK!" that is these are real anomalies not youtube and ATS space anomalies.

reply to post by Phage


Thanks Phage, you are right, being the exact link for the catalog:
Anomalies catalog

This is interesting, what is it saying exactly?

ATF12 Spectroscopic Evidence of Life in Space

reply to post by SeeingBlue


"Spectroscopic" makes me think that somebody is analyzing the light from some place of the universe, and its getting the signature of organic molecules.

That, or maybe is something similar to the points in this article:

`There would have to be some unusual event which would take particles from the Earth to a height of 40 kilometers,'' Lloyd said in a telephone interview. The bacteria could have hitched a ride on a rocket or satellite into space or they really could be from another planet. ``We have no evidence for one or the other as yet,'' said Lloyd. ``The most likely possibility is that the bacteria have arrived from another planet. I'd like to think that, at any rate.''

reply to post by oshdra


It says NASA is responsible for hiding these things from the public? Why? Why not give that job to the CIA, or even the MIB? Why would an endeavor which is mainly about science, exploration and discovery be forced to hide any abnormal discoveries with the world.

Scientists are typically more than willing to share their discoveries...



[edit on 20-3-2010 by Titen-Sxull]

[edit on 20-3-2010 by Titen-Sxull]

Originally posted by Titen-Sxull
reply to post by oshdra

 

It says NASA is responsible for hiding these things from the public? Why?

It says so, but as Phage pointed out, this list was taken from a know no NASA source. It seems the codes where created by an independent researcher, not NASA.

Why not give that job to the CIA, or even the MIB? Why would an endeavor which is mainly about science, exploration and discovery be forced to hide any abnormal discoveries with the world.

I know that official NASA mission is mainly about science, exploration and discovery. Is just that not everybody is sure its real mission is that one. Have you hear that NASA stands for "Never A Straight Answer"?? how scientific sounds that?

Scientists are typically more than willing to share their discoveries...

Maybe... but politics not. Have you hear if there is any know date for the disclosure of Tesla work?? Those documents have been restricted for what? 70 years??