It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ugie1028
I dont know how to appropriately react to this post. It was brought up with me a few days, and its some scary legislation.
Let them try and round up people.
according to voters in MA, 1/4th believe 9/11 was an inside job.
lock away 25% of the population! just try and do it! you know thats just going to cause a revolt.
if this passes, oh man, some people would call this the first shot.
Originally posted by skeptic_al
reply to post by ChemBreather
How many researchers have actually gone to NY and actually talked to
the Fireman Radio Operators, the Elevator Repair Crews, the Elevator company,
the Security Guards for the previous week, the people doing the salvage,
the people at the Airport. Now, that would be research, but I don't remember
seeing or hearing anything these things in peoples "research". I'll expect the
usual answer though, that's because the Government is silencing them man.
Originally posted by Zanti Misfit
reply to post by ChemBreather
[mor
Would I be considered Insane if I still believed that being a Citizen of these United States Of America, I Still have the RIGHT to FREE SPEECH ? Last time I checked , the Constitution says I do ..........
for the duration of hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners in which the individual has engaged, or which the individual has purposely and materially supported, consistent with the law of war and any authorization for the use of military force provided by Congress pertaining to such hostilities. "
Originally posted by MrWendal
reply to post by VitriolAndAngst
People are only noticing because the president is black? Could it be possible that people are noticing now more than ever before, that the 2 party system is really just one in the same. Both parties have the same agenda, and now with a Democratic Congress and President it is obvious more than it ever has been before?
No, your right. That can't be the reason. It's cause Obama is black...well half black actually.
Originally posted by Kram09
I can't believe nobody has commented.
This is really unbelievable. I just don't understand. Americans have had their rights stripped away, yet the sense of apathy by many (but not all) is frustrating.
The people need to be roused up and.....march on Washington in droves.
Originally posted by jaynkeel
Originally posted by Kram09
I can't believe nobody has commented.
This is really unbelievable. I just don't understand. Americans have had their rights stripped away, yet the sense of apathy by many (but not all) is frustrating.
The people need to be roused up and.....march on Washington in droves.
How can anyone be surprised anymore, everything that you were taught growing up as a young child and a young adult is and was a lie. That's as simple as it gets, yes people are roused up but what is anyone gonna really do about it? Nothing the people in power have made it damn near impossible to do anything about it. The time for marching is long past my friend there is too many chiefs and not enough Indians. I hate to say it but I don't have much faith in the human species to recover from our asinine ways, "it's time for us as a people to start making changes, lets change the way we eat, lets change the way we live and the way we treat each other"- Tupac, maybe he was on to something....
Originally posted by MrWendal
reply to post by SpartanKingLeonidas
IF they get off their duffs and vote. Fact is however, that many Americans have not taken the time to research. Most Americans do not believe or do not know that these Executive Orders exist. The majority does not know the real issues and the majority are still caught up in the left right nonsense and are in love with the drama of the in fighting.
That being said, the majority may change. People are becoming more aware. The question is will they become aware before the end game is reached? I personally do not think so.
Quote from : Wikipedia : Executive Order
An executive order in the United States is an order issued by the President, the head of the executive branch of the federal government.
In other countries, similar edicts may be known as decrees, or orders-in-council.
Executive orders may also be issued at the state level by a state's Governor or at the local level by the city's Mayor.
U.S. Presidents have issued Executive Orders since 1789, usually to help officers and agencies of the Executive branch manage the operations within the Federal Government itself.
Executive orders do have the full force of law since issuances are typically made in pursuance of certain Acts of Congress, some of which specifically delegate to the President some degree of discretionary power (delegated legislation), or are believed to have their authority for issuances based in a power inherently granted to the Executive by the Constitution.
It is these cited or perceived justifications made by a President when authoring Executive Orders that have come under criticism for exceeding Executive authority and have been subject to legal proceedings even at various times throughout U.S. history concerning the legal validity or justification behind an order's issuance.
Originally posted by smurfy
reply to post by SpartanKingLeonidas
Hi Spartan,
I realise that you are "up" on the American law and are entitled to add your thoughts as to how this new bill might be constrained, but I have to draw attention to one paragraph you posted,
"Yes, there are Emergency Planning laws, which will actually shut down certain rights of citizens, but there has to be an incident happen, whether real or a False-Flag Operation, something has to actually happen, (my Italics) before those contingency plans can and or will be implemented, I have thoroughly researched each and every single one of them as I have learned of them throughout my life."
I'm wondering, as a lot of people did at the time, why people, (protesters) were driven off the streets, and also arrested in Philadelphia, at the time of the G8 conference there, by the massive "Village People" lookalike contingent, before any "Incident" happening. It had to be the most disturbing dance I've ever seen.
[edit on 15-3-2010 by smurfy]
Quote from : Wikipedia : Agent Provocateur
Traditionally, an agent provocateur (plural: agents provocateurs, French for "inciting agent(s)") is a person employed by the police or other entity to act undercover to entice or provoke another person to commit an illegal act.
More generally, the term may refer to a person or group that seeks to discredit or harm another by provoking them to commit a wrong or rash action.
Originally posted by Brotherman
reply to post by SpartanKingLeonidas
Our age isnt lazy it is our age that has taken the work of your age and is refining it maybe one day that we are no longer cutting down trees making books and done burning gas going all over hell and creation looking for info we can take on oh IDK world hunger or a cure for lupis good post though man you do make a good point but as you know the conception of the internet for the time back in 90 probably seemed to be a pandoras box for those who understood its potential but hot damn am i greatful for it now
Originally posted by EvolvedMinistry
Don't worry too much folks. The government is scrambling around because their illusion of control is fading. They are not as much in charge as they would like you to believe.
Their control is slipping as we speak.
Originally posted by Zanti Misfit
reply to post by smurfy
" I'm wondering, as a lot of people did at the time, why people, (protesters) were driven off the streets, and also arrested in Philadelphia, at the time of the G8 conference there, by the massive "Village People" lookalike contingent, before any "Incident" happening. It had to be the most disturbing dance I've ever seen. "
Forgive me , but I am not familar with this inncodent . Care to explain it to me in more detail ?
Originally posted by skeptic_al
reply to post by conspiracy88
Yes I've seen those as well,
I should have also added, these truth seekers continually take things
out of context to justify thier own story. The tend to just take 1 or 2 words
out of the whole conversation and build their own story around that.
Classic: "Pull It", this is is always quoted, but it's very rare to find the whole
conversation in tact. And it takes quite a bit of "Research" to find it.
Neverless: Assuming the Fire Chief was NOT in on it, I can't Imagine the
Fire Chief taking orders from a Achitect, under any circumstance. Firefighters
number one goal is to save lives and second is to save property, "Pulling" the
building before it's time would break both those rules as Pulling the Building
would endanger even more Firemen.