It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Bhadhidar
Originally posted by Magnum007
... It's like Sponge Bob vs. Goliath...
Interesting read though... Made me smile for once...
Magnum
But Goliath...Lost.
And David was Hebrew.
Still smiling?
Do you appreciate what they're suggesting? Nuking Europe? That's madness.
AGREED
If Iran said that they'd probably already be under airstrikes.
Originally posted by Bhadhidar
But Goliath...Lost.
And David was Hebrew.
Still smiling?
Israel would not fire it's nuclear weapons at Europe (and vice versa), and even if it did, it would not cause "nuclear winter" for two reasons. One, because it wouldn't take long to destroy Israel. And two, because nuclear weapons aren't as powerful as people think. Sure, enough of them could cause nuclear winter, but it would take more than one just to take out a major city. Now imagine that on a global scale.
These topics always boil down to both sides launching all their nuclear weapons at the other and no one takes the time to consider how illogical and unrealistic such a conflict is.
Originally posted by Yissachar1
America and the UK signed but STILL have nukes positioned all over the world... Why are you not mad about that?
Originally posted by Yissachar1
I try not too but its hard.. I hope America stays free though,
But neither nation is threatening to destroy all of Europe if they cannot have their own way.