Why Blacks embrace their opressors God

reply to post by ButterCookie


I am sorry you feel that way but stand back and respect your right to feel that way. Certainly some points are valid. If a little knowledge is a dangerous thing a little religious knowledge is a killer. But I ask you...

What is wrong with loving your brother as yourself?
This with nothing added and nothing taken away is the Christian faith.

Don't shoot the messenger.

reply to post by ButterCookie

Not sure if anyone else has knowledge on the Anunnaki.

Not being critical....just a little funny considering where we are.

We all know about the Anunaki.

I mean really - who doesn't like Zechariah Sitchin?



[edit on 11-3-2010 by rusethorcain]

Originally posted by mahtoosacks
reply to post by Exposing The Devil

 

the proper thing to say is, black people ruled PART of europe. spain to be exact. during the moorish conquest.

they never made it to briton or the germanic tribes, or the vikings.

the franks (or french today) are the peoples who pushed them out. they were islamic foreign invaders.

Nope, all of Europe.
White people were shoved into the Caucasus Mountains, thats why we named you Caucasian and you kept the name, thats also why white people like rock climbing.
Even the Bible tells us white people liked living in mountains and caves.

All the original people in Europe were black hebrews, white people came after, come with thing better than Wikipedia, Wikipedia = History written and edited on the fly by anyone with a computer. What a horrible way to research.

Quite obvious you looked at my post and scrambled fast to Wikipedia to see what garbage you can come up with.

Your wiki proof is garbage compared to the official coat of arms I posted, I have a few 100 more, and a ton of books.

reply to post by rusethorcain


You are sorry that I feel what way? I love all mankind and anything else that is out there...

Sorry that you feel that I don't, only because i'm discussing African history.

reply to post by Exposing The Devil


You and your Xtian love of the bible would make you even more an uncle tom than I. Your blatant inability to argue in a reasonable manner is obvious because because you quote scriptures at nauseum.

I wonder if you are not just a white racist because you effectively derail any attempt at sane discussion about race with complete irrelevancies then your other Churchians come in and "hey presto. " Sensible debate has gone south.
Did you ever once decide to go and address the OP? I think not. So you have obviously run out of youtube clips??

Finally just remebr this When You and your kind were cowering in the corners of church me and mine where out there fighting the cops over riacism and social injustice. Yes I am proud to be a streetcorner activist when you simple have youtube and a bible (thatyou don't understand.

Get back to me when you have something original to write. I will be waiting.

reply to post by Exposing The Devil

White people are good rock climbers? I did not know that.
Are you a good swimmer?

reply to post by Exposing The Devil


You are absolutely correct. Africa had at least 32 ruling dynasties in Africa, before the slave trade and yes, we RAN europe..

That is true how they got their names ( caucasians).. i read a lot about them also being a result of blacks that had leprosy ( whitening skin disease) and that when the Africans started having babies born with leprosy all-over, they were frightned by the appearance of the strange-looking babies and yes, that's when we ordere them to the caves.

Before we all run off the rails here bashing white folks...don't forget John Brown, a white man who some say single handedly began the civil war...
en.wikipedia.org...
here's a little snippet from the link...much more there
[John Brown (May 9, 1800 – December 2, 1859) was an American abolitionist, and folk hero who advocated and practiced armed insurrection as a means to end all slavery. He led the Pottawatomie Massacre in 1856 in Bleeding Kansas and made his name in the unsuccessful raid at Harpers Ferry in 1859. President Abraham Lincoln said he was a "misguided fanatic" and Brown has been called "the most controversial of all 19th-century Americans."[1]

His attempt in 1859 to start a liberation movement among enslaved African Americans in Harpers Ferry, Virginia electrified the nation. He was tried for treason against the state of Virginia, the murder of five proslavery Southerners, and inciting a slave insurrection and was subsequently hanged.

Southerners alleged that his rebellion was the tip of the abolitionist iceberg and represented the wishes of the Republican Party. Historians agree that the Harpers Ferry raid in 1859 escalated tensions that a year later led to secession and the American Civil War.]

And what about the QUAKERS??? - RADICAL CHRISTIANS???
cghs.dadeschools.net...
[Before the eighteenth century, very few white men questioned the morality of slavery. The Quakers were among these few. The doctrines of their religion declared an issue such as slavery to be unjust. By 1775, the Quakers founded the first American anti-slavery group. Through the 1700s, Quakers led a strong-held prohibition against slavery. The Quakers’ fight inspired growing numbers of abolitionists, and by the 1830’s abolitionism was in full force and became a major political issue in the United States]

Here are some white abolitionists
William Lloyd Garrison, Lucretia Coffin Mott, sisters Elizabeth Buffum Chace and Lucy Buffum Lovell, Angelina and Sarah Grimké, Abigail Kelley Foster, - www.pinn.net...

and check this site where the information below was copied from- Please note the last sentence encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.comWhite...+abolitionists
[(c. 1783–1888) Movement to end the slave trade and emancipate slaves in western Europe and the Americas. The slave system aroused little protest until the 18th century, when rationalist thinkers of the Enlightenment criticized it for violating the rights of man, and Quaker and other evangelical religious groups condemned it as un-Christian. Though antislavery sentiments were widespread by the late 18th century, they had little immediate effect on the centres of slavery themselves—the West Indies, South America, and the southern U.S. In 1807 the importation of African slaves was banned in the U.S. and the British colonies. Slavery was abolished in the British West Indies by 1838 and in the French possessions 10 years later. In the 11 Southern states of the U.S., however, slavery was a social and economic institution. American abolitionism laboured under the handicap that it threatened the harmony of North and South in the Union, and it also ran counter to the U.S. Constitution, which left the question of slavery to the individual states.
The abolitionist movement in the North was led by agitators such as William Lloyd Garrison, founder of the American Anti-Slavery Society, writers such as John Greenleaf Whittier, former slaves such as Frederick Douglass, and Harriet Beecher Stowe. The election of Abraham Lincoln, who opposed the spread of slavery to the West, marked a turning point in the movement. Convinced that their way of life was threatened, the Southern states seceded from the Union (see secession), which led to the American Civil War. In 1863 Lincoln (who had never been an abolitionist) issued the Emancipation Proclamation, which freed slaves held in the Confederate states; the 13th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution (1865) prohibited slavery throughout the country. Slavery was abolished in Latin America by 1888. In some parts of Africa and in much of the Islamic world, it persisted as a legal institution well into the 20th century.]

There's more- encyclopedia.farlex.com... not hailing the white man... but be fair.

We are more the same than we are different.
....but you don't really want to know that do you???

So - enjoy the fight, but since no one's clued you in...

...it's over.



[edit on 11-3-2010 by rusethorcain]

Originally posted by Exposing The Devil

Originally posted by mahtoosacks
reply to post by Exposing The Devil

 

the proper thing to say is, black people ruled PART of europe. spain to be exact. during the moorish conquest.

they never made it to briton or the germanic tribes, or the vikings.

the franks (or french today) are the peoples who pushed them out. they were islamic foreign invaders.

Nope, all of Europe.
White people were shoved into the Caucasus Mountains, thats why we named you Caucasian and you kept the name, thats also why white people like rock climbing.
Even the Bible tells us white people liked living in mountains and caves.

All the original people in Europe were black hebrews, white people came after, come with thing better than Wikipedia, Wikipedia = History written and edited on the fly by anyone with a computer. What a horrible way to research.

Quite obvious you looked at my post and scrambled fast to Wikipedia to see what garbage you can come up with.

Your wiki proof is garbage compared to the official coat of arms I posted, I have a few 100 more, and a ton of books.

lol oh you named us now HAHAHA

wow the koolaid you drink is strong.

all because of your "book".

what is the name of these books? o let me guess, you have the only one.

Originally posted by ButterCookie
reply to post by Exposing The Devil

 

That is true how they got their names ( caucasians).. i read a lot about them also being a result of blacks that had leprosy ( whitening skin disease) and that when the Africans started having babies born with leprosy all-over, they were frightned by the appearance of the strange-looking babies and yes, that's when we ordere them to the caves.

Again. Leprosy is NOT abinism. Leprosy is caused by a skin eating bacteria and does NOT change someone's genetics. Imo you just want to associate white skin with a disfiguring skin disease because it has an "ew" factor and you are using it to denograte whites.

[edit on 11-3-2010 by riley]

Originally posted by Tiger5

You and your Xtian love of the bible would make you even more an uncle tom than I. Your blatant inability to argue in a reasonable manner is obvious because because you quote scriptures at nauseum.

Yes I am proud to be a streetcorner activist when you simple have youtube and a bible (thatyou don't understand.

Thats all you got?

You think the Bible was made by white people? lol

What street corner do you go on? I'm sure it's nothing like what we do, every Saturday cursing out cops and Uncle Toms like you.
I am a street corner activist, we record everything we do on Camera to expose the deceivers.

dailymotion.com keyword search "israelite"

Wheres your work Uncle Tom?

know that the basis of all religions lies in Myths. The Annuki is just a new myth. So what we seem to have in the annuki is a modern myth that is being spread amongst the population by a variety of carriers. Most obvious is David Icke. The High keeper of the myth is Zachariah sitchen but he is not a scholar of repute.

We already seem to have the makings of a doctrine of evil based on the reptilians. We have strayed from the Atheist perspective but it is all good.

But this is not being hateful because I fully support the right of people to worship as they see fit. I merely prefer not to receive their gospels

[edit on 11-3-2010 by Tiger5]

Originally posted by riley

Again. Leprosy is NOT abinism. Leprosy is caused by a skin eating bacteria and does NOT change someone's genetics. Imo you just want to associate white skin with a disfiguring skin disease because it has an "ew" factor and you are using it to denograte whites.

Being Albino is a form of leprosy, Michelle Jackson's skin turned white because of leprosy.

There are 3 types of leprosy, the skin eating leprosy is just one.

reply to post by mahtoosacks


Hey Bro!

I suppose we must be brothers because I climbed rocks also so I must be a caucasoid that somehow got a coal black skin.

I’d like to know when people are going to stop with this calling others trolls every time somebody expresses an opinion they don’t like.

Even on a site like GLP, where almost every single post is a flame or racial or ethnic slur, people have the gall to call somebody a troll.

There was not a single troll post in this thread.

The Op started a thread under the presumption that everybody agreed that the Christ was some “oppressor’s” god or white man’s god.

Others posted to express their disagreement with letting him/her get away with the claim.

How was that off topic or a troll post? Since when do somebody get to post something and everybody is required to just debate on it as if it is indisputable fact?

The Christ figure is one of the oldest reverent focuses since the dawn of man—right after sun worship-- simply because it’s basically ancestor/leader worship, or worshipping a figure that has done something for people that they appreciate and remember—a figure that unites people and inspires them to higher being and pursuits.

As for the brother with all the pictures, I don’t know why people don’t know that he is going to win these debates. All the ancients traditions from every spot on earth, tells us that Black people once ruled the world—which should be no surprise to anybody since they were first on earth.
How are you going to be the first and only people on earth for a long time, and not be in the damn yearbook, or the subject of the statutes and stories?

The Ancients says their rule was foul though; nothing to be proud of-- ruling, abusing and lording over people no matter what race you are, or who you are.

The Christ was about justice and protecting and defending the defenseless and oppressed.
The Christ was about ensuring a decent quality of life for every body.

If somebody hadn’t already invented the Christ, distressed, powerless people every where would be creating him over and over again under different names, images and titles, heroes and leaders.

The message is universal, raw, beyond reproach, and clearly the greatest philosophy that can ever be devised if the goal is peace, justice, equality and enough of the earth’s resources for all.

And the only reason Christianity could have even remotely become a murderous movement is because of the great lie that merged the new testament god with the old testament god. And I say that knowing that the old testament god most likely sprang from Blacks than anybody else—but probably reptilian/saurian.

The originals Christians were all pacifist martyrs. How could they, or their legacy be blamed for the works of warmongers, torturers, oppressors or enslavers?

Originally posted by Exposing The Devil

Originally posted by riley

Again. Leprosy is NOT abinism. Leprosy is caused by a skin eating bacteria and does NOT change someone's genetics. Imo you just want to associate white skin with a disfiguring skin disease because it has an "ew" factor and you are using it to denograte whites.

Being Albino is a form of leprosy, Michelle Jackson's skin turned white because of leprosy.

There are 3 types of leprosy, the skin eating leprosy is just one.

ok so this is where you are confused...

When leprosy first appears on your skin, it begins as small, red spots. Before too long they get bigger, and start to turn white, with a shiny or scaly appearance. Pretty soon the spots spread over the entire body and the hair begins to fall out - first from the head, then even from the eyebrows. As things get worse, the finger nails and toenails become loose; they start to rot and eventually fall off. Then the joints of fingers and toes begin to rot and start to fall off piece by piece. The gums start shrinking and can’t hold teeth anymore, so each of them is lost. Leprosy keeps eating away at the face until the nose is literally lost, and the palate and even eyes rot - and the victim wastes away until death.

i dont see white people with scales and missing hair or fingernails. we also have teeth.

do have anything else we can disprove?

www.dermnet.org.nz...
have fun with that

[edit on 3/11/2010 by mahtoosacks]

reply to post by Tiger5


Myths?

So all the gods of the bible and the Greeks are just crazy...myths?

Lemme ask this, seriously..... Since the 'myth' of Et's sounds so crazy, where then do you feel angels were always traveling down throught the couds from?

A fairy tale place (that only exists when you die) or another planet?

Originally posted by ButterCookie
reply to post by Tiger5

 

Myths?

So all the gods of the bible and the Greeks are just crazy...myths?

Lemme ask this, seriously..... Since the 'myth' of Et's sounds so crazy, where then do you feel angels were always traveling down throught the couds from?

A fairy tale place (that only exists when you die) or another planet?

as an atheist, you would believe they were myths. are you not atheist now?

reply to post by Exposing The Devil


Kudos for the op and for those that know me, it was only a matter of time before i chimed in, hehe . During the Treaty of Versatile i think it is...when the Europeans where dumb enough to think they could conquer Africa individually, both religions where present. The Christians went west to Europe and the Muslims went south into Africa. Don't take my word for it though, Mario Van Peebles pops broke it down...i need to hunt down that video for the op..it was so long ago that i saw it. I don't even think that's how he explained but cutting a long story short, that's the jist of that portion.

Put that book away your scaring people..really! The racial identity of the moors is a hot button topic. The only reason why i know is because i looked into, not extensively but enough to know that someone somewhere is straight out lying. Yes, the moors that invaded and conquered spain where African. The same africans that created the Ottoman empire that had the entire middle eastern portion of the world including the Mediterranean on smash. What i find funny, especially when i watch say..the history channel, the moors or anyone from the Ottoman empire is depicted as white. And not Mediterranean white either..i mean European white and it just grates my nerves. Just like someone pointed out earlier, if skin color doesn't matter then why are darn near ALL images of Jesus have him with pale skin, blue eyes, and sandy hair eh? Images do matter..its a reinforcement of the subconscious.

I find it even funnier that when the Moors are finally kicked out of Spain (during the Ottoman Empire occupation, Europe was in the middle age "dark ages", coincidence?) then Europe has Renaissance. You would think it corresponds to them finally getting access to the library the moors had. I mean those Muslims kicked ass in science and math...i think most of their contributions where taken and claimed by others but i digress...

European culture stagnated twice! Twice (i had to repeat that) and in response the church sent their knights on a crusade throughout the middle east....i wonder why?

As crash as it made sound i agree with you Exposing The Devil in theory and principle. Just for giggles, you should mention that Hannibal was a black African..then watch people come out the woodworks!

[edit on 11-3-2010 by cenpuppie]

Originally posted by mahtoosacks

Originally posted by Exposing The Devil

Originally posted by Tiger5
reply to post by Exposing The Devil

 

Did you plan on photocopying the entire book? Here is an alternative viewpoint. At the time of the Coat of Arms it was fashionable to include the exotic and in those days black people were an exotic element as oppposed to the whinig embarassment we are today

Keep your lips sealed to Uncle Toms ass because your an embarrassment to the black race.
Here I am scraping up history that was white washed out by our oppressors and you come to defend them, you make an excellent slave, your no different than the slaves back in the day snitching out his own brother escaping the slave farm to the White Master.
You are the embarrassment.

lol now you fight each other. calling him the masters' pet.

seriously will the mods do anything about this OBVIOUS racism that is running around this site, or do the mods only care if its racism from whites?

You see Bro the problem is that this is an example of the Pan Afrikan mind set. Notice how there is a clear inability to deal with the MODERN situation. They go back to the past and are unable to cope with modern situations.

The point is that racism exists and needs to be abandoned.