It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
they feared the ship was in visual range of a camp where the Israelis were massacring POWs after having the prisoners dig their own graves.
Former Israeli officials in the U.S. government
Short video about PNAC
Originally posted by tooo many pills
they feared the ship was in visual range of a camp where the Israelis were massacring POWs after having the prisoners dig their own graves.
WHOA, that would be a huge bombshell if proven to be true.
Originally posted by tooo many pills
they feared the ship was in visual range of a camp where the Israelis were massacring POWs after having the prisoners dig their own graves.
WHOA, that would be a huge bombshell if proven to be true.
Storm brewing between Israel and Egypt over POWs
JERUSALEM: A diplomatic row threatened to erupt between Israel and Egypt on Monday over claims that an Israeli unit had killed Egyptian prisoners of war during the 1967 Arab-Israeli war.
The claims, aired in a public television documentary in Israel, have been vehemently denied by the unit commander Benjamin Ben-Eliezer, now national infrastructure minister.
But they have raised a storm of controversy in Egypt, where the affair has dominated the front pages for two days, sparked an angry debate in parliament, and led the foreign ministry to summon the Israeli ambassador in Cairo.
"A Massacre" thundered Egypt's mass-selling state-owned Al-Ahram newspaper.
Read more: Daily News Egypt
False Israeli "Massacre" Story Resurrected
Did Israeli forces massacre hundreds of Egyptian POW's during the Six Day War? According to Israeli press reports a new documentary, "Ruah Shaked," broadcast on Israel's Channel 1 alleges that such a massacre did take place, and attributes the killings to the elite Shaked reconaissance unit, then led by Binyamin Ben-Eliezer, the Labor MK and retired General who heads the National Infrastructures Ministry (for details see Egypt wants probe into 'IDF massacre'.)
But this particular massacre charge was first reported – and then thoroughly debunked – more than 10 years ago.
Read more: CAMERA
A communication to the Israeli Ambassador on June 10, by Secretary Rusk stated, among other things: “At the time of the attack, the USS Liberty was flying the American flag and its identification was clearly indicated in large white letters and numerals on its hull. … Experience demonstrates that both the flag and the identification number of the vessel were readily visible from the air…. Accordingly, there is every reason to believe that that the USS Liberty was identified, or at least her nationality determined, by Israeli aircraft approximately one hour before the attack. … The subsequent attack by the torpedo boats, substantially after the vessel was or should have been identified by Israeli military forces, manifests the same reckless disregard for human life.”
The U.S. Naval Court of Inquiry record contains indepth testimony by a limited number of Liberty crew members and subject matter experts; exhibits of attack damage photographs, various messages and memorandums; and findings of fact. As to culpability, "It was not the responsibility of the court to rule on the culpability of the attackers, and no evidence was heard from the attacking nation", the court concluded that "available evidence combines to indicate..(that the attack was) a case of mistaken identity." Additionally, the Court found that "heroism displayed by the Commanding Officer, officers and men of the Liberty was exceptional."
The Joint Chief of Staff's Report contains findings of fact related only to communication system failures associated with the Liberty attack. It was not concerned with matters of culpability, nor does it contain statements thereof.
Both the Israeli and US governments conducted inquiries into the incident, and issued reports, which concluded that the attack was a mistake, due to Israeli confusion about the identity of the USS Liberty. Some US diplomats, veterans and intelligence officials who were involved in the incident continue to dispute these official findings, saying the Israeli attack on the USS Liberty was not a mistake, and it remains the only major maritime incident in US history not investigated by the US Congress.[2]
In May 1968, the Israeli government paid US$3,323,500 as full payment to the families of the 34 men killed in the attack. In March 1969, Israel paid a further $3,566,457 in compensation to the men who had been wounded. On 18 December 1980, it agreed to pay $6 million as settlement for the US claim of $7,644,146 for material damage to the Liberty itself.[3]
On December 17, 1987, the issue was officially closed by the two governments through an exchange of diplomatic notes.
Admiral Thomas H. Moorer, former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and a critic of the official United States Government version of events, chaired a non-governmental investigation into the attack on the USS Liberty in 2003. The committee, which included former US ambassador to Saudi Arabia James E. Akins, held Israel to be culpable and suggested several theories for Israel's possible motives, including the desire to blame Egypt and bring the US into the Six Day War.
Originally posted by mmiichael
Welcome to the new era of popular conspiracy books.
Publishers are increasingly concerned with controversial subject matters.
WWII is constantly getting revisionism. At least one book on Pearl Harbour being a false flag. And endless "Who shot JFK" books which give conflicting answers based on 'solid' testimony. A few have written on how they were the ones who puled he trigger.
At least two old timers from the American military, one Jesse Marcel with his son, recounting how Roswell was a cover-up, conflicting with his initial testimony. A Col Philip Corso who claims he saw aliens at a military base.
All easily disproven bunk.
The US did a thorough investigation of the USS Liberty incident and concluded it was an accident. Many thousands of US military personnel have been killed in 'friendly fire' This is not a unique situation.
The son of an ensign trying to capitalize on the conspiracy market is not unusual. One would think the US military itself would have addressed the problem if it were there. They're the ones that ost personne. They've had over 40 years.
Tragically, Kennedy's ideas never came to fruition, and his heated battle with Prime Minister Ben-Gurion over whether Israel should be allowed to develop a nuclear program was ultimately lost. The reason why is that Lyndon Baines Johnson, who Kennedy intended to drop from his ticket in 1964 due to his extreme dislike for, had a complete reversal in foreign policy. As you will see, not only did Israel's nuclear program move ahead unchecked; they also became the primary beneficiary of our foreign aid.
But this absolute turnaround would not have occurred if Kennedy would not have been assassinated. Up until LBJ became president, Kennedy dealt with the Middle East in a way that most benefited the U.S. His primary goal - and one which would most keep the peace - was a balance of power in the Middle East so that each and every nation would be secure. This decision adhered to the Tripartite Declaration which the U.S. signed in 1950. But under the Johnson administration, this fragile balance was overturned, and by 1967 - only four years after Kennedy's assassination - the U.S. was Israel's main weapons supplier, and OUR best interests were put well behind those of Israel!
Originally posted by Drunkenshrew
Since this is a conspiracy site, I like also to throw in a wild theory. A theory, which links the USS Liberty to another conspiracy in US politics. The JFK assassination. One seldom followed track in the Kennedy assassination is the motivation of Israeli powerplayers. Israeli leaders were determined to get their hands on atomic weapons. Kennedy was an obstacle on the way to the Israelian atomic bomb. He was also an obstacle for the ambitious Lyndon B. Johnson, who felt belittled by the charming easygoing JFK. Both Mossad and Johnson were never above murder to achieve their ambitions.
...The evidence was clear. Both Admiral Kidd and I believed with certainty that this attack, which killed 34 American sailors and injured 172 others, was a deliberate effort to sink an American ship and murder its entire crew. Each evening, after hearing testimony all day, we often spoke our private thoughts concerning what we had seen and heard. I recall Admiral Kidd repeatedly referring to the Israeli forces responsible for the attack as “murderous bastards.” It was our shared belief, based on the documentary evidence and testimony we received first hand, that the Israeli attack was planned and deliberate, and could not possibly have been an accident.
I am certain that the Israeli pilots that undertook the attack, as well as their superiors, who had ordered the attack, were well aware that the ship was American...
...I know from personal conversations I had with Admiral Kidd that President Lyndon Johnson and Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara ordered him to conclude that the attack was a case of “mistaken identity” despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
Admiral Kidd told me, after returning from Washington, D.C. that he had been ordered to sit down with two civilians from either the White House or the Defense Department, and rewrite portions of the court’s findings.
Admiral Kidd also told me that he had been ordered to “put the lid” on everything having to do with the attack on USS Liberty. We were never to speak of it and we were to caution everyone else involved that they could never speak of it again.
Originally posted by mmiichael
Why Kennedy was done in complex.
The bunged attempt to off Castro, going after the Mob who put him in (Nixon technically won), dissolving the Fed, many enemies he made. Not a very good Pres. Almost started WWIII.
Originally posted by Sean48
Wow, your a peach.
You post here everyday , praising Israel and how Iran Must be Destroyed
for their Nuclear Aims. Yet you talk Crap about Kennedy because he took a
Stand about Nuclear Missles in Cuba.
Then you say He was NOT a very Good Pres ??????????
The US took a turn for the worse Nov 22/63 , and has been spiraling
downward since.
Originally posted by mmiichael
btw I put in a good word for Israel on this board as an effort to counter the malicious fictions that are spread in every other post here.
Mossad did in JFK. Some people actually take this garbage seriously.
Originally posted by Drunkenshrew
Well, the Mossad may not have been involved in the Kennedy assassination, but Israel is certainly a country which has more than a fair share of spies on American soil. Spies who sometimes have infiltrated even high levels of the government. Do you doubt, that the Israeli lobby wields a huge influence in Washington? Hell, in 1992 David Steiner, the head of AIPAC even had to resign after he was caught on tape boasting about his influence with president-elect Bill Clinton and Bush's chief of staff James Baker. And is the idea of blackmail by a foreign government really that ridiculous?
I would like to ask you two questions:
1. Can you find a sound reason why LBJ has called back the air support?
2. If you believe that LBJ was neither in cahoots with Israel nor blackmailed, why has he stonewalled the USS Libery investigation?