It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by rich23
Even if directed energy weapons do exist, it doesn't necessarily mean they were used to bring down the twin towers.
Originally posted by PookztA
Originally posted by rich23
Even if directed energy weapons do exist, it doesn't necessarily mean they were used to bring down the twin towers.
I respectfully disagree.
In my honest and professional opinion, Dr. Jones is covering up the truth about 9/11 just like he helped cover up the truth about Cold Fusion.
Just my opinion.
-Abe
Abraham Hafiz Rodriguez
M1 Medical Student
B.S. Biology / Neurobiology
Jones poses a revealing question-and-answer:
Q: "What data finally convinced you that 9/11 was not just by 19 hijackers?
A: Molten metal, yellow-hot and in large quantities…" [pdf (7/19/06) p. 45]
This statement raises two problems: first, Jones gives credence to the loony OGCT that "19 young Arabs acting at the behest of Islamist extremists headquartered in distant Afghanistan" were involved or caused 9/11.
It makes no sense to embrace parts of the government’s unproven story without independent proof.
If a scientist falsifies his data, his career is over. Why not the same standard for government liars?
Second, with so many compelling facts like near free-fall speed, symmetric disintegration in their own footprints, almost no concrete left, and many others, it is folly to rely on molten metal as the strongest evidence for demolition, especially flowing from windows in manipulated videos.
Originally posted by PookztA
How can you say she is disinfo when the evidence on her website speaks for itself?
Originally posted by PookztA
Have you even looked through all the evidence on her website before concluding that she is 'disinfo'?
Originally posted by PookztA
This is a very harsh claim are making
Originally posted by PookztA
How can you say she is disinfo when the evidence on her website speaks for itself?
Have you even looked through all the evidence on her website before concluding that she is 'disinfo'? This is a very harsh claim are making, and it's not an evidence-based claim either.
If you have proof Dr. Wood is disinfo (which she is not), then please provide it.
Originally posted by thesneakiod
Then why then isn't your theory of a controlled demolition being shouted from the rooftops? And with all your "proof" as well. That must be a stickler eh?
Originally posted by thesneakiod
According to you, no one is allowed any belief in DEW or support the no plane theory.
Originally posted by rich23
Rawstory, Prisonplanet and Globalresearch are all sites with large followings and some respected contributors. The evidence of thermite use is making better progress than the DEW (evidence-lite) theories.
Originally posted by Curious and Concerned
I'm not saying I fully subscribe to Wood's theories, but I don't have a lot of faith in Steven Jones' either.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
reply to [url=http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread549489
Doing what Judy Wood and the no-plane disinfo cult does by purposely lying and deceiving is also creating disinformation. That's why I call them disinfo artists. They create the disinformation that they peddle.
If the "space beam" camp and the "no-plane" camp all use the same exact tactics, that proves to me that all these disinfo "theories" are coming from one source: people working for the government who's mission is to discredit the 9/11 truth movement with these ridiculous "theories".