posted on Mar, 5 2010 @ 01:56 AM
Definition of False Dilemma according to
en.wikipedia.org...
The logical fallacy of false dilemma (also called false dichotomy, the either-or fallacy) involves a situation in which only two alternatives are
considered, when in fact there are other options. Closely related are failing to consider a range of options and the tendency to think in extremes,
called black-and-white thinking. Strictly speaking, the prefix "di" in "dilemma" means "two". When a list of more than two choices is offered,
but there are other choices not mentioned, then the fallacy is called the fallacy of false choice, or the fallacy of exhaustive hypotheses. False
dilemma can arise intentionally, when fallacy is used in an attempt to force a choice ("If you are not with us, you are against us.") But the
fallacy can arise simply by accidental omission—possibly through a form of wishful thinking or ignorance—rather than by deliberate deception ("I
thought we were friends, but all my friends were at my apartment last night and you weren't there.") When two alternatives are presented, they are
often, though not always, two extreme points on some spectrum of possibilities. This can lend credence to the larger argument by giving the impression
that the options are mutually exclusive, even though they need not be. Furthermore, the options are typically presented as being collectively
exhaustive, in which case the fallacy can be overcome, or at least weakened, by considering other possibilities, or perhaps by considering a whole
spectrum of possibilities, as in fuzzy logic.
Read this very closely, several times. It applies to many things. One prime example? Politics. Especially western politics.
What kind of options do we have when we go vote? Democrat vs republican. Sure, there's other alternatives but they are rarely, if ever mentioned.
Just look at what happened to Ron Paul, he was just completely ignored by the mainstream media during the primaries in 08.
You can also apply this to say, network television. What options are there? Cable vs sattellite. Other options are once again available, but once
again rarely mentioned, thus not there at all for some people.
You can apply this to just about anything.
The NWO is but one choice presented to us by the current people "in power". And so far we have been "with them", in my views. We have ignored the
alternatives because they are not mentioned but also because we have not made our own alternatives. IMO, the New World Order is not something that
will begin at a certain point in the future and go on for how ever long it may go on for. Quite the opposite. The New World Order is something that
started long time (meaning from my limited perception of time) ago and will end in the (hopefully) not to distant future.
False Dilemma.
[edit on 5-3-2010 by thereaintnospoon]