Noah's Ark Is (still) In Turkey: DISCOVERY !

Originally posted by spearhead
it would take a BS amount of water to flood the world like that.... i would believe this is a billion year old boat but not Noah's Ark... I've got that ship under a tarpoline on my trailor...

6,300 ft above see level.... that is a BS amount of water to reach that far up. where did it all go? the moon?

We also have the first mention of a rainbow at this time.

You need sunlight to have a rainbow...
...but if water was suspended in dense cloud prior to the flood, like Venus...
...and this was released and formed the oceans after the flood...
...could go somewhat toward explaining this anomaly.

Hey, if the Movie 2012 can do it!

Originally posted by Monsieur Neary

Originally posted by troubleshooter

Originally posted by Monsieur Neary

Originally posted by OzWeatherman
If Noahs arc is true, then why do kangaroos still exist?

You think they wouldve been wiped out in a flood considering nobody had been here at that time

Don't you see? All of the animals, including all 300+ species of marsupials, were conveniently living in Noah's neighborhood. Yet when the flood subsided, 60% of them had had enough and decided to walk/swim/walk/swim etc. from Turkey to Australia.

I play with timelines as a hobby and it never ceases to amaze me how nieve people are about linear timelines.

If the flood occurred it was approximately 6000 years ago...
...plenty of time for the natural redistribution of animals...
...and micro-evolutionary variation to occur.

[edit on 4/3/10 by troubleshooter]

And it never ceases to amaze me how naive people are about the fossil record....but that's another topic.

You mean dead animals layed down in layers of rock and soil...
...that's exactly what happens in floods.

Go get a random handful of soil from your garden and place it in a glass jar and cover it with water...
...shake it up and watch it settle out in layers...
...same thing but on a global scale would look like the fossil record.

ArkDiscovery Details and Much more about God

@ OP : Thank you!...It's great to see on a site such as ATS that there are some who have taken notice of what really happened, and as is the case, peoeple will choose to believe or scoff. If you check out the link you will also see the "Anchor stones" used to balance the ark.

Shame on the people who don't think Noad could have placed all the baby animals of each kind, not species, on the ark.

By the way: Even baby Dinosaurs were on the Ark! Glory to God when He comes and reveles His Majesty.

ignore all the drivle from the posters who dont accpet or understand. Ron Wyatt discovered this years ago, and it's been there for thousands of years, and the geo sonic scan show rivets made of steel and ship ribbing...and the Bible told us so

But hey, in this time, most people will ridcule you.

God Bless you in the name of Jesus Christ.

Amen.

[edit on 4-3-2010 by ImperialMaj]

Here's a great documentary on Noah's Ark:

www.youtube.com...#

... and don't forget ...

... Larry King and Helen Thomas were both there representing the Journal'a'saurus species.

Living proof, I tell ya.

Some things require a little study.

Some peeps posts are so over the top it's scary that they can vote or procreate. OMG

reply to post by IntastellaBurst


Well, wood that has been in or under water for a certain amount of time does not petrity as fast as if regular wood would on dry land. I know this from experience.

Further info about the dinosaurs - pterydactyls Moses encountered en route to Ethiopia - the Flying Serpents

Flysing serpents - Post Flood & Ark - Pterydactyls

here's the anchor stones that balanced up our Ark!
Anchor stones

Glory Glory!!!

Originally posted by ImperialMaj
Further info about the dinosaurs - pterydactyls Moses encountered en route to Ethiopia - the Flying Serpents

Flysing serpents - Post Flood & Ark - Pterydactyls

here's the anchor stones that balanced up our Ark!
Anchor stones

Glory Glory!!!

I knew it wouldnt be long before Jesus was riding a raptor.

This thread confirms to me something I have been suspecting for a while now. Any thread here that contains at least one word in all CAPS and at least one exclamation point! Is bound to be full of nonsense.

Originally posted by troubleshooter
reply to post by DarkspARCS

 

The Turkish government certainly believes this formation is Noah's Ark...
...they have named the area the Noah's Ark National Park.

Did anyone ever speculate that the Turkish Government simply named it "Noah's Ark National Park" to ONLY attract tourists (or becomes it rhymes!? HAHA!) After all, aren't all tourist sites associated with making money? Isn't that why a majority of national parks in the U.S. have toll booths? Just because they associated the name of the national park with someones beliefs, don't assume that they believe it to be what it's claimed to be.

Secondly, someone can find anything and associate it with Jesus or any other biblical story, and people will buy it. Look at the the "portraits" of "Jesus" in a grilled cheese, and "portraits" of "The Virgin Mary" on random objects etc. They sell, simply because of the vast majority of people who follow Christianity. Fact is, the mind plays tricks on you. If you look at an abstract piece of art, or structure, for a good amount of time, you can almost see anything your mind can come up with. Just like the post of the gorilla on Mars lol.

But, back to the original topic here. It simply looks like a geological formation, nothing to me says otherwise. That's all I have to say about that.

reply to post by uglybattle


www.youtube.com...

For all who blindly say ,"Why doesnt Mainstream Media Report this finding "
Well they did.. ,20/20 News Report 1985 , Click on link and goto 14.09 secs , jeez the nerve of some people ,S&F 4 O.P .

Originally posted by itsmethegoat

Originally posted by troubleshooter
reply to post by DarkspARCS

 

The Turkish government certainly believes this formation is Noah's Ark...
...they have named the area the Noah's Ark National Park.

Did anyone ever speculate that the Turkish Government simply named it "Noah's Ark National Park" to ONLY attract tourists (or becomes it rhymes!? HAHA!) After all, aren't all tourist sites associated with making money? Isn't that why a majority of national parks in the U.S. have toll booths? Just because they associated the name of the national park with someones beliefs, don't assume that they believe it to be what it's claimed to be.

Secondly, someone can find anything and associate it with Jesus or any other biblical story, and people will buy it. Look at the the "portraits" of "Jesus" in a grilled cheese, and "portraits" of "The Virgin Mary" on random objects etc. They sell, simply because of the vast majority of people who follow Christianity. Fact is, the mind plays tricks on you. If you look at an abstract piece of art, or structure, for a good amount of time, you can almost see anything your mind can come up with. Just like the post of the gorilla on Mars lol.

But, back to the original topic here. It simply looks like a geological formation, nothing to me says otherwise. That's all I have to say about that.

Well if you say so , then im with you , cause your sooooo more convincing then the experts ,

@ Count Chocula - I was under the impression the ATS site was where we respect one another's views on matters and many posts here on ATS have CAPs and exclamations. What has caused you to be so disrespectful of others opinions? If you dont believe pterodactyls existed and belive all dinosaurs were extinct long ago, by all means, you are entilted to that and I respect it. From my research the earth is not that old and dragons/dinosaurs were hunted and killed off over the last 6000 or so years, but much evidence is around and stories. Do a bit of research instead of being so judgemental.

No - I did not say Jesus rode a pterodactyl, only that Moses encountered them and were called flying serpents from the research I have done and he used other birds (Ibes) to combat their prescence. Note: Jesus can Ride anything He wants to!!!

Here in Afrika where I live the local people will tell you stuff that no one has been able to see as the lake here is 80% unexplored...read and learn...Mokele Mbembe - An African Story

Or more : Flying serpents in Africa

Jesus Christ will Rule! like it or not.....







[edit on 4-3-2010 by ImperialMaj]

reply to post by StaceyWilson

Well if you say so , then im with you , cause your sooooo more convincing then the experts

There are Noahs Ark Experts?

Wow...i'm in the wrong profession.

You mean i can get paid to take pictures of fuzzy shapes in mountain sides and pass them off as any phenomena i want...so long as the objects themselves can never be verified or disproven?

Damnit, is that all it takes to be an expert these days?

A phony scapegoat & a camera?

reply to post by letthereaderunderstand

These are not actual lengths rather God is using a just scale...RATIO, so that the dimensions transfer equally. Noah (rest) and his sons were charged with building an ark and that is why you find them all around the world only with different motifs, but the same basic structure...Pyramid or ARC.

Wow, that's a pretty wild theory: The flood arc is the Khufu pyramid. Well, lets see what we got here:

1 - The first civilization recognized by modern history, was the Sumerian, raised 6.000 years ago.

2 - According to some "outta box" archeologists, the main pyramid of Giza has over 12.000 years old.

3 - According to translations of Zecharia Sitchin, Noah aka Ziusudra, was one of the first patriarchs of the "Shem people".

4 - The word "Shem" means literally rocket. Noah belonged to first generations of the Adamic race. The LU.LU created by the Anunnaki through genetic engineering. The scriptures say he reached a 1.000 years lifespan, very common in pre-flood humans.

5 - Noah worshiped ENKI, not "God" meaning the cosmic creator.

6 - According to Sumerians, Nibiru was entering our solar system and the so called "Council of the 12", the Anunnaki big-bosses, gathered to decide the future of Earth colonization.

7 - ENLIL aka Yahweh totally against the crossbreeding of Anunnaki and humans, pressured the Council to let mankind perish on the cataclysms.

8 - By 10 x 2, it was decided.

9 - ENKI and his half-sister and master geneticist NINHURSAG aka Hathor, voted against the extermination and faced ENLIL, but and in the last words of ANU, his authority should be kept.

10 - ENLI forced the Anunnaki promise nobody would rescue any human or any other living creature on Earth.

11 - ENKI also had to promise it but as a genius, he just figured out he couldn't rescue no Earth creature, but nobody said he couldn't TEACH a human how to save the others.

12 - ENKI met Noah in secret and provide him with layouts, tools, material and some confident Anunnaki engineers to build a submarine-like ship.

13 - ENKI ordered Noah to pick up as many animal and vegetable species as he could.

14 - Sitchin can't specify if the secret helpers of Noah, gathered these creatures with aircrafts or if they gathered GENETIC SAMPLES. IMO, if really all species of world were saved, most likely they flew all over the Earth abducting animals.

15 - The ENKI's plan worked perfectly, I mean, were saved as many species as possible.

16 - Sitchin doesn't tell how Noah and the survivors of his Ark, survived to ice age.

17 - According to Sitchin, the Giza pyramids were built just when the Anunnaki came back, after the water levels got lower. They rebuilt the space complex of SIPPAR.

18 - The Ararat (Arat??) Mount, the first natural landing mark used by Anunnaki pilots, was busted and ENKI ordered his engineer son NINGISHZIDA aka Toth aka Quetzalcoatl, to built a new landing mark. He built 3. The 3 pyramids of Giza.

19 - Supposedly the pyramids were used as chambers of sound and magnetic resonance, that guided the instruments of their crafts.

Well, it's seem Zecharia Sitchin is still the ONLY reference we have, to know what happened in those times.

Anyway is still a mystery how a guy named "Ziusudra" became "Noah"... Probably how most Anunnaki didn't know about the Ark, when they saw Ziusudra plus thousands of survivors, someone shouted "WOAH" and someone said "WHAT, NOAH???"

[edit on 4-3-2010 by ucalien]

[edit on 4-3-2010 by ucalien]

So we have more pictures of another location for Noahs ark
We have more people talking about "Noahs Ark Experts"

We have more reasons why "human beings cannot go inspect the Ark site"



To Recap, we have another brain-dead quest for adventure so some clown with an Indiana Jones hat can go get on TV.

I'm moving on. If i wanted to talk to a brick wall, i'd preach common sense to my Dog... at least he'd have a chance of understanding.

[edit on 4-3-2010 by Snarf]

The geological feature mentioned by the OP is NOT the Ark...

Sorry, the entire Ron Wyatt thing is a complete falsity and has been debunked. That is not an ark at all, for the ark was in no way shaped like that, and also, if you look at a larger picture of that particular area, you will see that natural phenomenon appearing all over the mountain.

Remember, the ark was not a BOAT, is was a BOX, just like the Ark of the Covenant. The word "ark" is explained here:

1. The Biblical word for Ark is "tebah". It is used 28 times in the OT and is only used of Noah's Ark and for the container in which Moses was hidden among the bulrushes. Because of a similar Egyptian word meaning "box", and the ultimate purpose of the Ark, we believe the Ark was not like a streamlined vessel designed to easily glide through the water. More likely it was shaped like a rectangular barge which floated rather low in the water. From the story in the Bible, it also would appear that Noah had no control over the vessel. He, and it contents were at the total mercy of God.

Source

First, take a look at the photos in the following website, particularly the photos that show what looks very much like the "box-shaped" ark, with proper proportions, 3-decks, etc.



The research done by Ed Davis was quite amazing.

Noah's Ark Photos and Information

Here are some other videos on Google that show what has been found on Mt. Ararat:







[edit on 4-3-2010 by downisreallyup]

Originally posted by ImperialMaj
@ Count Chocula - I was under the impression the ATS site was where we respect one another's views on matters and many posts here on ATS have CAPs and exclamations. What has caused you to be so disrespectful of others opinions? If you dont believe pterydactyls existed and belive all dinosaurs were extinct long ago, by all means, you are entilted to that and I respect it. From my research the earth is not that old and dragons/dinosaurs were hunted and killed off over the last 6000 or so years, but much evidence is around and stories. Do a bit of research instead of being so judgemental.

No - I did not say Jesus rode a pteradactyl, only that Moses encountered them and were called flying serpents from the research I have done and he used other birds (Ibes) to combat their prescence.

Here in Afrika where I live the local people will tell you stuff that no one has been able to see as the lake here is 80% unexplored...read and learn...Mokele Mbembe - An African Story

Jesus Christ will Rule! like it or not.....

Well i was under the impression that we are trying to deny ignorance here. The same kind of forensic science used to carbon date fossils are the same ones we use to investigate murders, test DNA, and send people to their death. While they are not fool proof, they are for the most part, vetted by Scientists all around the world.

Jesus Christ will Rule! like it or not.....

You see, right there you just shot your argument all to hell. You don't respect others views if you follow everything with an absolute.

@ucalien

"Well, it's seem Zecharia Sitchin is still the ONLY reference we have, to know what happened in those times. "

Not so, thank God for the Bible, and proper science and cameras....

"Anyway is still a mystery how a guy named "Ziusudra" became "Noah"... Most likely how almost all Anunnaki didn't know about the Ark, when the saw if and Ziusudra, plus thousands of survivors, someone shouted "WOAH" and someone said "WHAT, NOAH???"

I'd prefer the Bible's version of a man chosen by God to lead a new covenant who was a family of 8 people and who is spoken about throughout the scripture and revered and resepcted by many. There is a purpose to life and great events like Noah's Ark are not a joke or a haphazzard event.

Let's remain respectufull of our elders, Noah being one.

@count chocula

"Well i was under the impression that we are trying to deny ignorance here." Certainly - and I have found evidence that the earth is not that old. I am not ignorant of "carbon dating techniques" and thier fallability....just wish to highlight that Dinosaurs were around recently....it's something you believe or not...I cannot convince you immeditely and possible never...


Yes, I do believe He will rule...whether people like it or not....but that in no way means I will be disrepectful to your views.



[edit on 4-3-2010 by ImperialMaj]

1) Actually guys, there is no evidence in the Bible that says/suggests that the flood was local. The Scriptures are pretty clear that the flood was global.

Global Flood in the Bible:

A) Genesis 6:11-13....God said he will destroy all men along with the Earth. Which means, unless you're diluting yourself by not reading what it says but instead what you want to read, that God will destroy the Earth. Not part of the Earth, not part of the population of man. The entire population of man, and the entire Earth.

B) Genesis 6:17...."And behold, I Myself am bringing floodwaters on the earth, to destroy from under heaven all flesh in which is the breath of life; everything that is on the earth shall die.".....The only way for everything on the earth to die is to have a global flood. There's no way around it.

C) Genesis 7:4...."For after seven more days I will cause it to rain on the earth forty days and forty nights, and I will destroy from the face of the earth all living things that I have made."....Again, its there in black and white. In order for God to destroy "every living thing that I have made", there would have to of been a global flood. Again, no way around it.

There are no mincing of words that can be done. If you give the line of thought that you can't read the flood story literally, then you have to agree that you can't read the story of Jesus saving mankind literally. Which means that reading the Bible would be a waste of time. The Bible isn't a buffet. Either you take all of it literally, or you take none of it literally. Even the parts that have been proven 100% accurate by archeology and other primary historical sources.

[edit on 4-3-2010 by nazukeoya]

[edit on 4-3-2010 by nazukeoya]