the anunnaki?

reply to post by hippomchippo



so you wouldn't know what you were looking at right? thats where we are.

Originally posted by Parta
reply to post by hippomchippo

 

so you wouldn't know what you were looking at right? thats where we are.

I don't know why you're dodging a simple question.
I'm only asking for the evidence that links the annunaki to the gravettians and aurignacians

reply to post by hippomchippo


i'm not dodging a question. what do you know? can i use bigger words? do you like lotsa pictures?

Originally posted by Parta
reply to post by hippomchippo

 

i'm not dodging a question. what do you know? can i use bigger words? do you like lotsa pictures?

Please tell me then, who EXACTLY are the annunaki?
Alien, human, or non existant?

reply to post by hippomchippo


humanoid aliens that are non existent to us atm.

Originally posted by hippomchippo

Originally posted by Parta
reply to post by hippomchippo

 

i'm not dodging a question. what do you know? can i use bigger words? do you like lotsa pictures?

Please tell me then, who EXACTLY are the annunaki?
Alien, human, or non existant?

aurignacians occupied the choice lands in a sea of gravettians. exactly. post glacially.

you know it wasn't anything that clever to go and look. it was all on a map. where did you go?? don't want to see the map at least?

Originally posted by Parta
you know it wasn't anything that clever to go and look. it was all on a map. where did you go?? don't want to see the map at least?

Actually I was reading a book, books are swell, sir.
Relax, I'm not going to argue the ancestral orgins of something that I consider to be a myth.

Originally posted by hippomchippo

Originally posted by Parta
you know it wasn't anything that clever to go and look. it was all on a map. where did you go?? don't want to see the map at least?

Actually I was reading a book, books are swell, sir.
Relax, I'm not going to argue the ancestral orgins of something that I consider to be a myth.

i think you're watching the holy grail sir robin. the weight of what you believe is an unlaiden swallow. [can i say this??]

[edit on 19-3-2010 by Parta]

Originally posted by Parta

Originally posted by hippomchippo

Originally posted by Parta
you know it wasn't anything that clever to go and look. it was all on a map. where did you go?? don't want to see the map at least?

Actually I was reading a book, books are swell, sir.
Relax, I'm not going to argue the ancestral orgins of something that I consider to be a myth.

i think you're watching the holy grail sir robin. the weight of what you believe is an unlaiden swallow. [can i say this??]

[edit on 19-3-2010 by Parta]

I have no idea what you're talking about so I'm going to leave the discussion as you evidently can't talk about things in physical terms, or have no idea what the word evidence means.

reply to post by hippomchippo


i know you have no clue about anything and yet you want evidence. an ant wants evidence of an elephant.

lets start with an easy one . did you know there was a sea filling hte middle danube at the end of the ice age??




easy one. if you don't know why it applies then we can't go much farher.

Good thread!

I enjoy reading everyone's input on this. Of course the debunkers are so quick to dismiss stuff like this, because to them seeing is believing. Unfortunately a closed minded view on such things is disappointing to me, because from what i've read in this thread, it's obvious to me that most of the debunkers have never read Sitchin's material. Or if they did, they've only read what's online or maybe one book.

I've read all 6 books of the earth chronicles by Sitchin, and am now reading the Lost Book of Enki. The latter is absolutely awesome in that it explains it from the Annunaki perspective (Enki in particular because it's his autobiography).

And yes i know and understand that Sitchin's stuff to some might seem like a good fairy tale. But in all fairness, there's just way too much information and findings that have occurred in recent history that imho offer his writings some credibility. Not too mention, answers alot of questions we've had about our history for a long time.

I also can admit that humanity has been brainwashed for a very long time to believe only the bible or similar. And not to question it. We live in a very different world now. A lot of new discoveries, a lot of new information etc. So it's extremely exciting, but also important to analyze it all with an open mind. For some people it just doesn't resonate with them. But for me, Sitchin's story is the only one that answers almost all the question's we've ever had about our history. And it's not only his translations of the texts etc that he uses. He cites many other sources, books, and references from many other archeologists, scientists, etc. So his writings are a combination of everything he could find on this subject.

Sitchin spent 30 years researching, documenting, translating, and reading a variety of books from the past before he wrote the first book "The 12th Planet". And this was written back in 1976. So to just debunk someone that spent that long studying and researching this because u think he was just looking for an income is absolutely ridiculous imo. What would be the point of that? Not too mention that one just needs ask this question:

Why have we been mining gold for so long, and more importantly, if one had all the gold in the world in a vault, of what value would it be? and to whom? Gold has forever been a big part of our history. Maybe they are hoarding it all away, so it can be transported at some future point in time? That seems to be the logical reason, as there just isn't any other reason that imo answers this question properly.

As far as Nibiru goes, we may not see it until it is right in front of us as it approaches from behind the sun, and is a brown dwarf so doesn't really emit much light. Its supposed to come from the south and no it may not happen in 2012. Sitchin doesn't say it WILL come in 2012. But figures it could happen in the next 100 years or so. So we won't know if some of these earth changes we are experiencing are the result of Nibiru or our approaching of galactic center.

I don't think anyone can say for sure if Nibiru does or doesn't exist. Because in our scientific minds, physical evidence is the only proof unfortunately. And because of this mindset, it limits our ability to hypothesize the other evidence out there. But just because someone's interpretation of these texts doesn't jive with your particular viewpoint, does not in anyway make it true or untrue.

Imho and i don't really care what anyone else thinks, Sitchin is probably more closer to the truth than we give him credit for. And i think as time goes on, this will become more and more credible.

Here is a good link for some viewing, but i still recommend people read all of his books to get a real good understanding of what he talks about. To just read excerpts and articles on or about him, doesn't do any justice!

Peace and Love to all!

[edit on 20-3-2010 by eArth33lr]

Here is a good link that summarizes some things. It's a pretty good read.

www.schooloftantra.net...

Originally posted by eArth33lr

it's obvious to me that most of the debunkers have never read Sitchin's material. Or if they did, they've only read what's online or maybe one book.

i hope you extend the same courtesy to the original materials [which are available to you] as you expect extended to sitchin. i can see someone reading the original materials and then sitchin and then proclaiming something but you can't fairly do the later without the former.

reply to post by Parta


Can u please share some helpful links? I would love to read what u may have.

reply to post by eArth33lr



surely.

ele text arch of sum lit

there is alot of reading there. to start you could search some terms like nibru because nibiru is a challenge. anuna because you can't find anunnaki until you flip to sumerian from english. e-kur, abzu etc. etc. its a neat thing.

reply to post by Parta


Thanks alot! I will be reading it tonite! Must take dogs for a walk first tho

reply to post by Maegnas
I am quite aware of my personal limitations in the realm of communications. Meandering as you see, is me trying to bridge vast amounts of time and distance. Not something a mental defect like myself is expected to be capable of. We do the best we can, with what we have to work with. Thank you for your constructive criticism. Such is life.

eArth33lr, I believe your position on the subject is the way to go, to find the ultimate answer.

I went to your link and was struck with some thoughts right off the bat. But First, to the self appointed detractors, hundreds of thousands of years of history written by the winners, DEMANDS a open mind. Continue to demand proof will only keep you locked into the matrix. The personal proof you look for will come in time, if you allow yourself the time!

Zecharia Sitchin documents how, 300,000 years ago, extraterrestrials--astronauts from the planet Nibiru--mixed their genes with Homo Erectus’ to breed us as mining slaves

The problem with this is that "We" on the surface have only have a DNA history that goes back as mentioned earlier, and I have no reason to doubt this, 80,000 years. Either Sitchin is wrong with his time line, or we are looking at another entirely different species of human that preceded us. I favor the idea that this relative of ours is the true missing link.

An atmospheric crisis 445,000 years ago on Nibiru sent Nibirans–big human beings who looked lots like us modern humans-- to Earth to mine for gold. to shield Nibiru’s diminishing atmosphere.

If taken on face value, we were created to be the slave, of slaves, to mine gold, to save the atmosphere of their home planet.

Who can honestly say "slaves" are worthy of the truth? Does anyone really believe a slave owner would tell the whole truth, to a mere slave, a genetically created imbecile who's only role is to serve their master, and die?

I'm not going to get into the whole debate about "Nibiru" being a lost planet, or the watery opening to the hollow planet. Or, that it in reality may be the hollow of another planet that though time has been lost. But what I do want to point out is that the "Atmosphere" salvaging operation that required so much mining may have not been strictly for gold, or what we commonly refer to as gold..

It has been mentioned in the past that the Grand Canyon of North America is really logically running the wrong way to have been created by water erosion alone, and that it was really a product of "Mining". If you were looking for vast amounts of raw materials to salvage a "Atmosphere" from deterioration would a soft metal like gold be a superior choice over iron? Depends on what is causing this deterioration in the first place, or if, it is deterioration at all.

Another choice is you are creating a habitable domain and have to convert its natural non breathable atmosphere into something you can breath. You would not need gold to do this unless gold had another property for another reason. Gold is suspected to be used in another form to give long life as it has very little use as a construction material. Iron has the strength required to hold an Atmosphere at bay. Could this be the reason for the hexagon on Saturn? The Annunaki moved to the suburbs. Once the project was complete there was no longer a need for a "slave race" except to mine gold, as we value it today for a misunderstood reason. It would also explain why a certain group of individuals seem to have made "Gold" their god.

The following photo of Saturn's north pole is evidence, not proof.

reply to post by Parta


The seals are interesting, but I don't see what you see. There is a serpent god on one. The other has a dwarf god surrounded by lion men. The first two don't really look like bringing supplies and tools to me. Maybe I'm just not up on ancient symbology, but I would want more that a branch to build a boat.
Still, good work finding all those and linking them for us to look at.

Speaking of Saturn, I'm just wondering where Iapetus fits into all of Sitchin's(which I haven't read) research.

A Moon With a View, Part 1

I'm really not that much into such 'fringe' subjects but Hoagland and the rest of the crew at Enterprise Mission present a strong case for Iapetus being an artificial moon. Although, I wish they'd hurry up and finally write part 7.