It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by star in a jar
It's not techinically a planet, but more like a failed star with possible planetary companions, and I think Z. Stichin took the mythology of Nemesis and crafted a story around it. It doesn't mean the whole thing is a fraud.
I don't know if it can be seen, 'Nibiru' is most likely a brown dwarf companion star to our sun called Nemesis, and brown dwarfs emit no light, I've seen descriptions of brown dwarfs being coloured either red to black, maybe orangish, but they don't radiate light. They emit heat, however.
No, they can't because it is impossible to prove a negative. It's a logical fallacy.
Originally posted by warpcrafter
I would gladly suffer a little embarrassment if the powers that be could provide irrefutable proof that Nibiru did not exist. They cannot, because they know it does and are going to great lengths to cover it up.
Originally posted by warpcrafter
reply to post by SuperSlovak
I would gladly suffer a little embarrassment if the powers that be could provide irrefutable proof that Nibiru did not exist. They cannot, because they know it does and are going to great lengths to cover it up. What will happen when it gets close enough that anybody with a telescope in their back yard can see it?