It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
My source is all available images of the Pentagon and the witnesses that were there.
Originally posted by dereks
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
My source is all available images of the Pentagon and the witnesses that were there.
So you have no source for your claim, you ignore the physical evidence like other "truthers".
This is why the "truth" movement will not get anywhere, the "truthers" have no actual physical evidence of any sort of explosive or thermite being used at the WTC, and totally ignore the physical evidence of the 757 that hit the Pentagon.
The one attempt to prove thermite was used at the WTC turned up paint, and they had to resort to a vanity press without peer review to get that published, a vanity press that has been shown would publish anything if you paid them $800!
Originally posted by baboo
Dereks, you need to be more specific as to exactly what evidence is being ignored.
Why do you believe no evidence of thermate has been found?
Why do you think it is obvious that the Pentagon was hit by a plane.
I'm really interested in both sides of this issue.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Lastly, while looking at what the 9/11 truth movement offers in way of evidence, "mini nukes", no planes at the WTC, "pods", and other such nonsense are not supported by the greater 9/11 truth movement, nor acknowledged by the professional research organizations within the 9/11 truth movement as credible theories.
Originally posted by baboo
Here Dereks, here's a start for you to consider...
Thermate in the WTC...
www.youtube.com...
Originally posted by dereks
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
My source is all available images of the Pentagon and the witnesses that were there.
So you have no source for your claim, you ignore the physical evidence like other "truthers".
This is why the "truth" movement will not get anywhere, the "truthers" have no actual physical evidence of any sort of explosive or thermite being used at the WTC, and totally ignore the physical evidence of the 757 that hit the Pentagon.
The one attempt to prove thermite was used at the WTC turned up paint, and they had to resort to a vanity press without peer review to get that published, a vanity press that has been shown would publish anything if you paid them $800!
Originally posted by dereks
Evidence like this thread www.abovetopsecret.com... that shows how a 757 hit the Pentagon, and the damage it caused....
Originally posted by seethelight
Russia Today is NOT a credible source.
Originally posted by dereks
Originally posted by baboo
Dereks, you need to be more specific as to exactly what evidence is being ignored.
Evidence like this thread www.abovetopsecret.com... that shows how a 757 hit the Pentagon, and the damage it caused....
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Lastly, while looking at what the 9/11 truth movement offers in way of evidence, "mini nukes", no planes at the WTC, "pods", and other such nonsense are not supported by the greater 9/11 truth movement, nor acknowledged by the professional research organizations within the 9/11 truth movement as credible theories.
As a 9-11 truther I feel insulted by your last paragraph. I really do!
If we are not willing examine various theories, some more credible than others, than how can we ever determine what likely happened? Just saying the government lied because the towers could not fall straight down won't cut it imo.
You have to be willing to go out on a limb even if proven wrong later on. Nothing ventured, nothing gained! The hell with credibility, as though the government had all the credibility, and we had none. Can't you see its all BS?
You guys remind me of mainstream ufo skeptics that believe only what seti and mufon say and disregard everything else as trash. Your doing a big disservice to the community! A wise man listens TO ALL SIDES of any given topic BEFORE making up their minds, regardless how crazy a theory MAY SEEM!
Obviously the government planned 9-11 very well and intentionally made it confusing so no one could easily figure it out. Forget the deniers who simply deny everything and start developing a 360* view on the issue.
[edit on 28-2-2010 by EarthCitizen07]