It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
An 18-year-old U.S. student is accused of posing as a girl on Facebook, tricking at least 31 male classmates into sending him naked photos of themselves and then blackmailing some for sex acts.Anthony Stancl of west of Milwaukee, was charged Wednesday with five counts of child enticement, two counts of second-degree sexual assault of a child, two counts of third-degree sexual assault, possession of child pornography, repeated sexual assault of the same child and making a bomb threat.
www.ireport.com...
He faces up to 50 years in prison when he's sentenced Wednesday afternoon. Prosecutors have said they'll recommend a "substantial" sentence.
www.todaystmj4.com...
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
One would have to ask oneself what is more embarrassing: a nude photo you sent to some dude or dropping to your knees and blowing the guy?
Really, that's some weak blackmail right there. I can't imagine the mindset of the 'victims' who would opt to whore themselves out rather than let themselves be seen naked.
I know crack heads that wont even prostitute themselves for a fix.
Originally posted by jjkenobi
You have to remember kids under 18 don't have fully developed common sense reasoning. They also don't have life experience that produces wisdom. They are also usually extremely horny. This is why there are laws to protect them from being taken advantage of. Lock the guy up and don't let him out. I can guarantee you he will be a repeat offender and may do worse next time to young children.
Originally posted by Death_Kron
Yeah, thats actually a great point! How on earth can they be classed as a "victim" if they willingly performed oral sex on the guy in question?
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
is blackmailing forcing?
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
Originally posted by Death_Kron
Yeah, thats actually a great point! How on earth can they be classed as a "victim" if they willingly performed oral sex on the guy in question?
Yes this is a valid point actually
Doesn't it make the sentence seem harsh and unfair now?
is blackmailing forcing?
Originally posted by Death_Kron
Originally posted by jjkenobi
You have to remember kids under 18 don't have fully developed common sense reasoning. They also don't have life experience that produces wisdom. They are also usually extremely horny. This is why there are laws to protect them from being taken advantage of. Lock the guy up and don't let him out. I can guarantee you he will be a repeat offender and may do worse next time to young children.
I agree to a point, I was extremely horny before I turned 18 but if I turned up expecting to meet a girl and instead met a guy then I would of been out the door faster than you can say ... something really fast!.
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
reply to post by Mr Mask
The guy is 18 and the victims were his classmates so they were all probably 17, 18. This isnt like some 40 year old was abusing 8 year olds or something.
If some 18 year old gets into a fist fight with a 17 year old is it suddenly infinitely more heinous because he was technically beating on a child?
Relatively speaking the 18 year old blackmailing his classmates could be considered a child himself.
Originally posted by Cole DeSteele
Wait, hold up...where did you all get the impression that this guy dressed up like a woman and then blackmailed classmates into blowing HIM?
That makes no sense.
HE was blowing THEM, more likely, and not revealing his true sex till after...then BAM the blackmail.
This is what I gleaned from the links.
CDS