It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The 'Mentally challenged' posting on Alien ATS forums

page: 13
29
<< 10  11  12    14 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 12:36 AM
link   
reply to post by Maybe...maybe not
 


My apologies to you Maybe....maybe not, i did not see the scroll bar. The first photograph does show aliens and i think, the roof of a house. I was thrown off by the statement that the craft had landed in my yard/garden. It landed on the mountain and remained "parked" there. Blacking out my face (and the ufo's i thought) fueled my response for which i do apologize. Simply so you will know, i had 2,818 visitors to my photobucket account today and they all see my face so i took the blacked out face to be a putdown.



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 12:41 AM
link   
reply to post by weedwhacker
 


That creature has stolen the space modulator....

And yes now blurry pictures do constitute proof of aliens.

I guess you didnt get the memo?


Edit to remove triple negative. yeah im talented

[edit on 13-6-2010 by LittleIndianJr.]



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 12:58 AM
link   

Originally posted by debris765nju
reply to post by Maybe...maybe not
 


My apologies to you Maybe....maybe not, i did not see the scroll bar. The first photograph does show aliens and i think, the roof of a house. I was thrown off by the statement that the craft had landed in my yard/garden. It landed on the mountain and remained "parked" there. Blacking out my face (and the ufo's i thought) fueled my response for which i do apologize. Simply so you will know, i had 2,818 visitors to my photobucket account today and they all see my face so i took the blacked out face to be a putdown.


Debris765nju.....

Great mate! .....I'm glad we cleared that up!


I'll get back to the detail of your photo in a little while.

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 04:43 PM
link   
reply to post by Maybe...maybe not
 

s914.photobucket.com...
After you check out the spacecraft you might want to check out these aliens that arrived via "portal."

[edit on 093030p://pm3017 by debris765nju]

[edit on 093030p://pm3057 by debris765nju]



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 07:16 PM
link   
reply to post by debris765nju
 


I'm sorry....what?

Your link to "photobucket" brings me to a page that as NO relation to what you're claiming.

Please fix.


Thanks.



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 09:43 PM
link   
reply to post by weedwhacker
 


Thanks fpr the heads up, IE keeps shutting down and doing things it isn't supposed to do. debris765nju



posted on Jun, 14 2010 @ 10:39 AM
link   

Originally posted by ripcontrol


Just so you know you have qaulified yourself to be banned.


13 pages. Still not banned. I guess that means someone out there at the ATS controls agrees. Maybe you should send a report to the mods because your feelings are hurt. I'm sure they'll have mods working in shifts to make sure your feelings are met so that no one here is offended.



Originally posted by Encoded05


In fact the more i think about it the more astounded i am at the OPs ignorance. You are neither qualified, or have the right to make these brash claims about somones mental health... especially when things are being discussed via a forum.



What did you do, read 2 sentences of this thread before posting? Talk about ignorance. In your case, it appears to be laziness. We're discussing a violation of the T&C's by a specific member, not the over-arching issue of mental health. Do yourself a favor and try reading thru this thread. Then read a book.



posted on Jun, 14 2010 @ 12:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by debris765nju
reply to post by NightVision
 


You need to focus, i didn't say you were two other people. I said that two of your staunchest supporters were new and had no threads and that they had the same writing style as you. I do not create my own support group as i don't have time for them. I have aliens and so do you. I know you are in denial but you photographed them, pointed them out with red arrows and posted them here on ats. I stated that i am better than Greer and CSETI at pointing out aliens, i now add you to that list. I still claim to be the world's formost authority on this particular type of alien. I am proud of my accomplishment. One thing they will teach you in psychology is that you cannot photograph delusions. A parting thought, neither of those two identities bothered to post disclaimers. Details get you every time.

[edit on 013030p://am3011 by debris765nju]

I am a staunch supporter of nobody. I have a new profile, but that is only because I used to frequent this site years ago, then went years without visiting here. I had to create a new profile.

I'm sorry it took so long to respond, but I ask you to please view my post as being a viewpoint from one, independent site member. My view is my own, and it has only been influence by facts and observations.

Debris, I went through a period where I was very much like you.

Pull it back together.



posted on Jun, 14 2010 @ 11:11 PM
link   
2c.) Multiple Accounts: You will not create multiple user accounts and "talk to yourself".

2d.) Forum Gangs: You will not engaged in an organized collaboration with other members to disrupt thread topics or interrupt the flow of normal collaborative discussion. Doing so will result in removal of your post(s) and immediate termination of your account I have been on ats since 2007 and in that time i never had a foe...until now. Suddenly, i find myself with an entire list of them. Funny thing is, they are all in this forum. It gets better, they are all new members with no threads, very few posts, no personal information. For some reason these people speak to me as if they know me and parrot the rhetoric of the op. All these new members appear as friends of a popular figure on this thread. If you are posting multiple user accounts, if you are using them to inflate your star and flag count, now might be a good time to make them go away. Just saying....



posted on Jun, 14 2010 @ 11:31 PM
link   
reply to post by Xcalibur254
 
I know there are people who have problems that claim visitations from aliens. I know because I used to attend a few abductee meetings at a local library. Several attendees used to describe the feelings of schizophrenia to us all and explain why they felt the medication was blocking their contacts with the ETs. They were actually arguing for not taking medication. This went on as one man walked around the room talking to himself. Another wanted to show us the method the aliens used for sperm extraction using a styrofoam cup to aid him........ I left.

I left knowing that there were several people there who were overshadowed, that wanted to speak but were never given the opportunity. Speaking to them on the sidelines I felt that they were legit, not mentally impaired, just wanting to discuss their experiences with others. The verbose ones wouldn't give them a chance.

I think the statistics are over weighted with the intense ones, the ones that yell it to the roof tops that won't give the time or space for others to speak out. The real ones tend to run away and say "no way, not in this zoo".

Just my 2 cents,

STM

Note: I do believe that there is a possibility that the mentally impaired are seeing something, just what it really is is difficult to ascertain due to their impairment.

[edit on 6/14/2010 by seentoomuch]



posted on Jun, 15 2010 @ 12:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by ripcontrol
reply to post by NightVision
 



And thus you advocate the slippery slope of tyranny.

This is what is starting to annoy me. You want to espouse ideas of alien life yet you have no problem closing ranks and squashing opposistion.

Who decides and who controls them?(those that deem mental incompetence)

I have noticed this trend beginning here and I come around still just to face you and remind you. (first censorship now this type of garbage)

Tyranny begins with good intentions! It is called the road to hell for a good reason!

Next do you think that anyone with mental health issues should not be allowed online?

Just so you know you have qaulified yourself to be banned.

Allowing ALL statements and points of view to be considered credible and immune to scrutiny and judgment, is just as illogical, impossible and tyrannical as censorship, close mindedness and opinion control.

There has to be a system of checks and balances in place in order to sustain any form of fairness or adherence to the truth, (or search for the truth).

Anybody that feels inclined to post their thoughts in an open forum must be prepared to defend those thoughts with more than just anger or fear. Not all perspectives are worthy of protection, and some are in desperate need of being torn down completely.

Exposure to a large number of observers from different backgrounds, viewpoints and goals is an excellent way to retain the checks and balances that are needed. There is no room for enabling and perpetuation of false data. Whether it comes from a source with a goal of disinformation, a person whom is simply mistaken, or a sick mind that does not know the information is false.



posted on Jun, 20 2010 @ 02:11 PM
link   
sure, that is what some want us to believe....

www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Jun, 21 2010 @ 12:41 PM
link   
reply to post by NightVision
 


If you want to do a drive by do it right.

Before I demonstrate a proper drive by for you I want to make sure I understand what you have stated.

Individuals with mental illness should not be allowed on ATS or as suggested even access to the internet.

This is the position you advocate.

I guess Ill through my phone book and email address and let a few people know that your official stance is that because thy suffer a mental illness they are not 'allowed' online.

I'll start with the vets I know. You know the ones that fought for this dream we call America. They suffer PTSD and other various mental illnesses so according to high mighty and wise you they dont have the right to post here.

Your words remember. They arent good enough to post here. YOUR WORD not mine.

Let me see who else does your general slander include.

I have to tell my girlfriend and some of her friends who have been raped. Seems some of the psychologist are treating two of them still for the nightmares they have. They are not according to you allowed online. I guess its there fault you are saying.

On your behalf I guess I'll have to notify the 9-11 survivors that because they are mentally unfit due to trauma they cant get online or post here.

I make sure I email there respective police departments and firefighters that you request that because they are not mentally fit you do not want them on YOUR website. (Thats right its not yours) You are smart enough to know that some are still in counseling. Of course because you are the arbiter of sanity.

Who else on your behalf needs to notified you dont want them talking about UFO's with you.

I guess this man is unwelcomed by you because he is mentally unfit

follow link




emotional difficulties that developed after his historic space flights. Wilford wrote, “XXXXX problems began almost immediately as he struggled to adjust to life in the limelight. This made him increasingly uncomfortable, which led to erratic behavior and eventually depression and alcoholism … In any event, he was hospitalized for severe depression” (p. 21).


another link

Like you said these people are not good enough to post online.

I ask you simply to give a better definition of mentally challenged and unfit instead of the the broad generalization you have given. Please list more specific diseases of mental health that disqualify and why . Thank you

Otherwise you have eliminated a lot of people from accessing this site by your opinion and a lot from the internet.



posted on Jun, 21 2010 @ 12:53 PM
link   
I think the mentally troubled take care of themselves after a while. Just a few months ago som guy got b& for sending me crazy rants over U2U. The last one he sent was a death threat to me and he was insinuating that he would hurt people close to him.



posted on Jun, 21 2010 @ 06:08 PM
link   
reply to post by ripcontrol
 


Ripcontrol…..

I find myself in agreement with the spirit of the posts of both your good self and NightVision.

As per my many posts to this effect…..

I want to assure you this thread was initiated with good intentions……it came about due to genuine concern about 1 or 2 specific members.

As anticipated, this is an extremely sensitive subject that is extremely difficult to discuss.

My position is this…..

On the one hand, if members are "rude & abusive" to such people (as has occurred on many occasions), it is possible such communications could have a significant negative impact on such people.

On the other hand, if members offer "support & reinforcement" to such people (as has also occurred on many occasions), it could reinforce delusions & psychotic episodes, thereby also having a potential significant negative impact on such people.

I don’t profess to have an answer as to how to handle these situations.

However, that doesn’t stop me being very concerned about it.

Kind regards
Maybe…maybe not



posted on Jun, 22 2010 @ 11:28 AM
link   

Originally posted by ripcontrol

Individuals with mental illness should not be allowed on ATS or as suggested even access to the internet.

This is the position you advocate.


I'm sorry ripcontrol, but based on the fact that you haven't read this thread in its entirety, I must disqualify your entire post, including all links. The OP was in reference to a specific member who's symptoms are consistent with schizophrenia, and who was abusing this and other threads. If you are going to do a drive by, do it right.

It matters not if a person is a Vet, has nightmares, depression or any other disorder, if they are violating the T&C's, they are out. And if you support this behavior, you should be out as well.






[edit on 22-6-2010 by NightVision]



posted on Jun, 22 2010 @ 03:03 PM
link   
reply to post by NightVision
 





The 'Mentally challenged' posting on Alien ATS forums I created this thread to pose a discussion on some recent threads here that seem to have no basis in reality. From time to time a thread will pop up in the Aliens forum by individual(s) who swear they see aliens but post nothing but blurry non-descript pictures. This is not to suggest that anyone is being deceitful. For many of these threads, the poster just seems to be seeing what he/she wants to, and after the ATS machine scrutinizes the data, the OP slowly comes back to reality. However... Every now and then you will find a poster who refuses to face reality: *SNIP* I have witnessed this 'phenomena' on more threads than I care to count (mostly on Mars and Aliens threads). Refusal to respond to pertinent questions, posting vague, blurry photos, ignoring data, acting paranoid, non-sensical sentence structure/subject matter, etc...The behavior presented by such individuals is consistent w. Schizophrenia and schizo-affective disorders. Growing up, one of my best friends developed the disease and often, these posts mirror the delusional nature of his disease. As a disclaimer, I do believe we are being visited by ET life. But how do we draw a line here? Is putting these threads in the Hoax forum enough? I feel these people are mentally sick and need help. MOD NOTE: Snipped reference to a specific member. We do not do that here at ATS. [edit on February 25th 2010 by greeneyedleo]


You got snipped I believe. You violated T&C.


So you are saying you flouted the beloved T and C rules you claim to love.

Whah


I have read the entire thread.

It bounces between two themes. First weigh ins on the mental health and then to UFO related material.

U earn an F in your attempt to revamp from your own narcissism.

All you have to do to prove your point, is post your name. Then the copy of a certified psych doc saying along all five axis that you are a normal functioning member of society.

Wait you cant do that here can you.



So rudeness is a T and C violation.

I bet you go crying and running to a mod first...

Your thread is supposed to be about the issues of weither or not someone with mental health issues should be allowed to post. Please do not whine nd answer the question asked...

Victims of tragedies should not be allowed to post because they are victims is what you are saying?



posted on Jun, 22 2010 @ 03:18 PM
link   
reply to post by Maybe...maybe not
 


I find myself in agreement with your statement in response. The way he responds seems to fit into that category to me.

As for your concerns it is one of the best outlines of the issue that has been lacking I starred it for that...

The only answer I can think of that would be good and yet at the same time respect individuality is this.

Is if there is an individual that behaves in such a way have someone here who specialty is dealing with such issues.

I do not like my next statement but I have found it true nine times out of ten.

If they do not want help then nothing can be done. Flag the T and C violations and proceed as normal. People can be communicated with hopefully so actions can be measured.

Their was one poster here who would fit into this. I haven't heard anything from his poster since it. It was the guy running in Oregon.

That is the only thought on it I have. Yall have any better Ideas?



posted on Jun, 22 2010 @ 03:21 PM
link   

Originally posted by ripcontrol



You got snipped I believe. You violated T&C.


This is correct. Previous to my post I was not aware of that specific T&C.



I have read the entire thread.


Perhaps you have read it. You clearly have not comprehended it.



U earn an F in your attempt to revamp from your own narcissism.


(yawn)



I bet you go crying and running to a mod first...


I didn't. You did. They actually applauded this thread.


Your thread is supposed to be about the issues of weither or not someone with mental health issues should be allowed to post. Please do not whine nd answer the question asked...


I created the thread. I know what it is about. It is not about what you think it is. If you think i am whining, I can refer you to a number of professionals who can help you with your comprehension problem.


Victims of tragedies should not be allowed to post because they are victims is what you are saying?


Wow. Just wow. Take a deep breath. Re-read the thread. If you don't get it by then, you never will.



posted on Jun, 22 2010 @ 03:27 PM
link   
reply to post by ripcontrol
 


Ripcontrol.....



You got snipped I believe. You violated T&C.

So you are saying you flouted the beloved T and C rules you claim to love.


I saw NightVision's opening post before it was edited.

I assure you that transgression was a "mistake" that was made with good intentions, in an effort to more clearly explain the intention of this thread.

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not

[edit on 22-6-2010 by Maybe...maybe not]



new topics

top topics



 
29
<< 10  11  12    14 >>

log in

join