It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
We are witnessing the ongoing disruption and death march of a planet, Li said.
Now scientists find the heat from the star is not enough to explain the planet's inflated size. Instead, the gravity of the star appears responsible.
Originally posted by Sinter Klaas
I just read about a planet 1.4 times The mass of Jupiter. The planet orbits it's sun in 26 hours completing a year
The most amazing part is gravity !!
The gravity is about 10 million times stronger then on Earth
Weird part is it comes from it's sun !!!
"Whereas tidal force on the Earth leads to a few meter changes in the height of the ocean surface, that on WASP-12b is 10 million times larger," said researcher Shu-lin Li, an astrophysicist at Peking University in Beijing.
I think you misread the part about 10 million times stronger, they were talking about tidal forces, not gravity:
Originally posted by Sinter Klaas
reply to post by Arbitrageur
I think you misread the part about 10 million times stronger, they were talking about tidal forces, not gravity:
Yes. Now would you then please explain to me, What is causing these tidal forces in the first place. ? And size IMO Tells you nothing about an object's mass. Don't you agree ?
I just read about a planet 1.4 times The mass of Jupiter.
The researchers predict this gas is flowing toward the host star, forming a tenuous disk that should emit heat detectable by the Hubble or Spitzer Space Telescopes.
They also calculate that an as-yet unseen planet roughly 5 to 10 times Earth's mass — a "super-Earth" — might be influencing WASP-12b's orbit.
The gravity of an alien star is causing its planet to unwind, research now reveals.
Originally posted by drsmooth23
but what I want to know is are there any observable effects from the planet acting on the star itself?
From the article I posted.
The researchers predict this gas is flowing toward the host star, forming a tenuous disk that should emit heat detectable by the Hubble or Spitzer Space Telescopes.
also, how does a planet that big last long enough to get THAT CLOSE to the star? the only thing that makes sense is if it was deflated and only recently "Inflated to its current size due to the heat. Since it was discovered only recently (Galactic-ly speaking that is) we will never know what or better yet "Where" it was before its current location.
Also from the article.
Now scientists find the heat from the star is not enough to explain the planet's inflated size. Instead, the gravity of the star appears responsible.
Originally posted by Sinter Klaas
reply to post by drsmooth23
I think it says it is the gravity of the sun pulling it apart not it's own.
The tidal waves are an example, because our sun and moon have the same effect on Earth.
The effect in the article is only 10. 000.000 times stronger do to the sun's gravity.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
Originally posted by Sinter Klaas
[
I think it says it is the gravity of the sun pulling it apart not it's own.
The tidal waves are an example, because our sun and moon have the same effect on Earth.
The effect in the article is only 10. 000.000 times stronger do to the sun's gravity.
That's the clarification that wasn't apparent in your OP, you got it!
That's why I said calling it tidal force was more accurate, since the common usage of gravity refers to the planets own gravity, but the tidal forces are caused by gravity too, it's just that we commonly refer to them as tidal forces and not gravity. That was my point, which you just agreed with, so we're on the same page now! Thanks.