It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Alethea
Read closely...it says not required. That means it won't be forced on you. But it has always been known that the mark will be voluntary. Then, it does mention how voluntary implantation is to be done. Which means there will not be roadblocks and mandates like the alarmists were presenting.
Just because it will not be forced does not mean that it cannot be coerced.
Originally posted by rusethorcain
reply to post by pixanomaly
Aren't these chips already implanted in FL drivers licenses?
Originally posted by defcon5
Its more likely to be a deception in my opinion. For example, many people are willing to accept a biometric card that meets all the criteria of the “Mark”, because they incorrectly believe that the scripture states it must be implanted. Your RealID fits the criteria 100%, yet its not implanted so folks are willing to accept it. In my opinion, anything that controls my ability to hold a job, or access my accounts, and involves your finger prints or retina scan meets the criteria.
Originally posted by defcon5
Remember also that the US (the final world superpower that is based on the Roman Empire) has pushed all its allied nations to put similar ID's in place as per scripture.
Originally posted by Alethea
but I imagine many have because their religious leaders have said so.
Originally posted by Alethea
The hand/forehead as having a physical aspect could mean a card you hold in your hand or a number that you have memorized.
Originally posted by Alethea
The US is not based on the Roman Empire.
I think the real shame about these chips is that if it weren't for the fact that we can't trust TPTB not to missuse this tech, it could be very useful in kidnapping and missing persons cases. Just think, no more Maddie McCann's...
Originally posted by rusethorcain
reply to post by pixanomaly
Aren't these chips already implanted in FL drivers licenses?
Originally posted by spikey
reply to post by RestingInPieces
Perhaps because there are no interest groups that are planning to forcefully tattoo people, whereas there are interest groups that are planning to microchip people.
There is nothing wrong with clarity in law you know, especially when groups are seeking to exploit any potential loopholes in current legislation.