It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Collective Consciousness defines Rules of Reality
Posted by Enoch Tan - Share this article with friends!
Everyone has the capacity, at some level, to shape reality. This capacity is dormant in most people, who are known as sleepers, whereas magicians are said to be awakened. Because they’re awakened, magicians can consciously effect changes to reality via willpower, beliefs, and specific magical techniques.
What we know as “Reality” is created by thought and consciousness at all levels of Universal Life from The Source, The First Cause, God to the collective consciousness of created beings. Everyday reality is governed by commonsense rules derived from the collective beliefs of humans which is called the Consensus. The effects of physical laws in the world that we live in are not fixed but they shift according to the state of collective consciousness. Physical reality is an illusion, although a very persistent one.
Magic is simply the ability of a magician or will-worker to impose his will onto reality. Magicians are able to do this because they realize the physical world is a lie. A magician’s power, or level of awakening and understanding the depths of the Lie, is called Gnosis. The paradigm is the understanding a Magician has over particular facets of reality, which governs his ability to affect those aspects. The better the paradigm, the more capable the magician is in affecting reality.
A magician’s paradigm differs substantially from the Consensus. When a magician performs an act of magic that does not seriously violate the commonsense version of reality, it is called coincidental magic or synchronicity which can be accepted by sleepers as luck or pure coincidence. Magic that deviates wildly from consensus is called blatant magic because sleepers cannot accept it and therefore condemn it to be evil and unnatural.
In ancient times, civilization exist in a paradigm where magic and the supernatural was very much part of ordinary reality. The workings of magic and supernatural phenomena were a lot more in effect during that time. It was the onset of early science and technology that shifted collective consciousness from a magical to a more limited one.
As the masses’ beliefs shifted, the Consensus changed and magicians began to lose their powers and as their metaphysical influence waned. It was consensus reality that brought the lower rules of physics into play, but it was according to the purpose of the divine so that we can learn certain spiritual lessons from interacting with one another in an environment with more limits imposed. Many things that did existed in the past paradigm but which did not fit into this new paradigm was discarded and refuted to be myths.
The old enemy of religion and philosophy is science. But in fact, science will serve up the confirmation of higher reality and science will be the one to bring this to the world. Religion has tried to do it for 2000 years and has failed miserably. Once it is accepted and understood by scientists, the breakthroughs will be astronomical.
Physical reality is governed by collective consciousness therefore, transcending physical laws is not as easy as it seems in the face of consensus reality. Since the majority of people do not believe such things are possible yet, it is much more difficult to manifest those abilities in present time. But as collective consciousness changes over time, humans will be able to manifest more and more superhuman abilities starting with the more readily acceptable to the more outrageous kind.
The range of mind powers arranged in such a spectrum begins from intuition, manifestation, luck and moves on to psychic influence, telepathy and moves on to time manipulation, telekinesis, transfiguration, invincibility, levitation, teleportation and so on. Start by developing abilities that are more readily acceptable by consensus reality because they are more subtle ones. You will be more successful at them. Then again, you can be equally successful at anything if you can do it apart from the consensus.
Collective consciousness does not only define the rules of physical reality but it also defines every other plane of reality, except the personal dream plane which is created by individual consciousness. The difference between dream and reality is that a dream is what you are personally dreaming, but reality is what everyone is collectively dreaming. You have more freedom to manipulate your dream world than the collective dream world. Since reality is grounded by awareness, you are able to change reality by affecting it in areas where the consensus is unaware of, or by changing the awareness of people.
edit on 20-8-2012 by ZetaRediculian because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by AnthraAndromda
Yes, I don't need DNA, nor any other evidence at all. I culd simply issue an "edict", directing you all to beleive me.
Well, right after those six starships took the Earth from you, and I was installed as its govenor.
But, ya know what? We aren't about beating down a civilization just to prove a point, nor are we likely to provide any kind of assistance until you allow us to. At present; your governments have decided that any frm of interferrence is an "act of war". So, you are not allow to use that argument
The old enemy of religion and philosophy is science. But in fact, science will serve up the confirmation of higher reality and science will be the one to bring this to the world.
Originally posted by AnthraAndromda
reply to post by Spruk
Pardon? I dont know who Charles F. Kerchner, Jr, a quick google search tells me hes an Ex-US Army commander US Navy Reserve? and has an interest in Genealogy.
Here is a link on the issue of mutation of the Y-DNA. It contains further links on the subject.
Enjoy.
edit on 20-8-2012 by AnthraAndromda because: (no reason given)
Estimates of TMRCA are based on the observed number of mutations by which the two Y chromosomes differ. Since mutations occur at random, the estimate of a TMRCA is not an exact number (i.e., 7 generations), but rather a probability distribution. As one uses more and more markers, the distribution becomes tighter and tighter about its mean value (its variance becomes smaller), and estimates have higher precision.
In an ideal world, we could directly count the total number of mutations at which two chromosomes differ. This is not be quite as straightforward as it sounds, as it makes assumptions about the underlying mutation process . Further, our estimates of mutation rates are still somewhat imprecise. To accommodate both these concerns, we use models that make certain assumptions. The philosophy has been to incorporate the most recent information, but also realizing that to correctly apply many of our refinements, we simply don't yet have all the information. As this information becomes available (such as good estimates of marker-specific mutation rates), the calculator will be updated to incorporate new data. Much of the data will come from the analysis of the growing FTDNA database.
- Source , Laurence A. Moran - Larry Moran is a Professor in the Department of Biochemistry at the University of Toronto.
Xue et al. (2009) did the experiment [Human mutation rate revealed]. They sequenced the Y chromosomes of two men who were separated by 13 generations. After eliminating repetitive regions, the relevant region of comparison was 10.15 × 106 nucleotides (base pairs, 10.15 Mb). The men differ at four confirmed sites. This gives a mutation rate of 3.0 × 10-8 per generation or 0.75 × 10-10 per nucleotide per DNA replication.
Originally posted by AnthraAndromda
reply to post by acidsweep
How about you stop with the ad homineim, and actually bring something to the table. So far you haven't said much, and what there was, wasn't original.
You are so "stuck" on me being what ever it is that you imagine e to be, that no amunt of reality, truth, or evidence will ever convince you otherwise. You have, therefore, lost objectivity.
Originally posted by acidsweep
Hey, Anthra...sorry to burst your bubble but..............
Originally posted by AnthraAndromda
Originally posted by acidsweep
Hey, Anthra...sorry to burst your bubble but..............
As I said, nothing! The anner in which you did your little "expirement" was seriously flawed.
Sorry to burst your bubble; but you have nothing.
Originally posted by acidsweep
reply to post by AnthraAndromda
No my 'friend', this was no experiment. Your lies were actually pointed out long ago. You are not worth the time. Plain and simple. Even now, you can't bring any actual proof. Any and all of your rebuttals have no basis, besides for mocking the people who have real intellect and have brought forth actual proof.
You have been debunked. Actually, you were debunked long ago by the wonderful members of this forum, people who who are much smarter than you; they talk with facts, not theories, not stories, and definitely not 'mother'.
You are a sorry excuse for a human (earthling) being, how dare you come on this forum and try to spread disinformation and lies.
You are the only one here with NOTHING. You've been exposed, give it up.edit on 20-8-2012 by acidsweep because: (no reason given)