Bob Kerrey (911 comm) admits 911 was Pre-Planned

Here we go again. Fuzzing and fighting about a statement related to 9/11. There's simply not enough meat on the bone to come to any conclusion what Kerrey meant to say.

Proceed ...

[edit on 9-2-2010 by Nichiren]

There's a bit of Cognitive Dissonance going around today. If 9/11 was sanctioned by the government there had to be some involvement on their part. Merely turning your head and ignoring something is an action.

reply to post by antonia


Please define what you mean by "government"? I'm not sarcastic, I'm really curious how you would define the US government.

if it was sanctioned by the government, then our government at that time, was just as bad as any dictator,

and as to defining the US government.......... corrupt, evil, twisted

[edit on 2/9/2010 by l neXus l]

Originally posted by Nichiren
reply to post by antonia

 

Please define what you mean by "government"? I'm not sarcastic, I'm really curious how you would define the US government.

I'm not entirely sure why you are asking me. I was writing that quip in response to some rather illogical trains of thought being posted. What i think of "government" or believe it is doesn't matter.

[edit on 9-2-2010 by antonia]

Originally posted by Bspiracy
You mention "planning or execution"..
If the government wasn't involved in the planning or execution then it really makes no sense to me why there would be a cover up by the government as acknowledged by Kerry.

Sure it does. 9/11 happens and George Bush and his cronies realize that they "knew" it was going to happen, had straightforward evidence warning about it, could have easily prevented it and handled the whole thing like the total loser that he is...

honestly, i dont think president bush was smart enough to orchestrate such an attack

reply to post by l neXus l


No. Bush isn't. But he wasn't the "decider" that he wanted everyone to think he was, either.

reply to post by Benevolent Heretic


your right, this is a true statement

bush obama

[edit on 2/9/2010 by l neXus l]

ok this is a little off topic i guess but i have to ask. Why do you think that Bush jr isnt smart? im personally no fan of his, but lets be real here, No one gets to that leval without having some grain of intelegence. can he speak elequintly (spelling?) no but since when has the ability to talk been a way of proving intelegence?

I mean take a look at Obama he speaks very well but would you really say he is a better president then Bush? as it sits right now i think we would have been just as well off "electing" Garry Coleman!


ok back on topic...

im not sure why its hard to beleive that at the least our Gov. had info detailing a plot of this nature, look just as far back as WWII and the events at Pearl Harbor, we knew about that before it happened and we did NOTHING. So why is it so hard for people to beleive that this could be the case now.

(personaly i beleive the Gov had a much bigger hand in it than that, but thats just my OP)

Those that forget the past are doomed to rellive it.

Personally I don't know what to make of this video. Certainly nothing conclusive... yet why bother to make the statement????

I guess it could be seen as a "cover your ass" statement. I mean he could have just walked away and it would have been a non event and no one would care.

Why drop the "30 year conspiracy" bomb when it is completely unnecessary?

He seemed as though he knew he was talking with "Truthers" and was saying you don't know the half of it!

Or he could have just been f*cking with them! Great find though S&F more evidence that the investigation was seriously flawed and another 9/11 commission member believes that a new criminal investigation is necessary!

reply to post by Benevolent Heretic


There's much more to it than just incompetence though.
There's implicit consent and obfuscation by
1: having a training exercise related to the exact same scenario on that day
and
2: allowing the guise of incompetence to be the reason why it was the first time in history planes weren't able to intercept ALL of the other planes.

You don't have 10's of historic firsts on one day like this without there being more than just incompetence involved. The odds are so astronomical that even being trite with the 99.9% sure it was complicit isn't near the higher number of 99.99999999999999999%. ,

Originally posted by serbsta

Originally posted by alienesque
i think it was cut..the background noise clearly changes suggesting its been edited..

In my opinion you're wrong. In fact in pointing out the background noise you've further solidified that there was no cutting done. Notice the laugh in the background? It begins right at the end of the first camera angle and continues through the second camera angle.

THIS IS GENUINE

Then again if I'm wrong, its still fine, just putting that out there.

you know you can overlay audio clips on multiple channels to achieve this

Originally posted by l neXus l
honestly, i dont think president bush was smart enough to orchestrate such an attack

don't give him all he credit

Please people, pay attention, George W. Bush is not "stupid," he is not even close to being stupid...

Seriously this is one of the oldest tricks in the book and we all fell for it.

LINK


Just act stupid and no one will expect great things from you.

[edit on 2/9/2010 by dalan.]

Perhaps Bob didn't care anymore and didn't think anyone would believe him anyways, and that it's been so long that no else would care to do anything anyways, as all the evidence on top of that, is long gone, again: in his mind.

Originally posted by fat_frank
Perhaps Bob didn't care anymore and didn't think anyone would believe him anyways, and that it's been so long that no else would care to do anything anyways, as all the evidence on top of that, is long gone, again: in his mind.

Not all men can sleep well at night , carrying the burden of innocent lives.

I think Mr Kerrey is one of them, he , through the 911 comm, was brought

into something that is not of his nature.

Well, finally had a chance to listen to the "interview" with the guy from WAC.

Does anybody really think that Gov. Kerrey and the interviewer are talking about the same thing? Obviously not.

Kerrey is talking about the fact that our defense and intelligence communities may not have been forthcoming during the commission hearings due to the CYA culture that has plagued those groups, particularly intelligence, since the Church committee hearings in the 70's, which is the 30 year old conspiracy that he was referencing, not some nebulous evil neocon master plan to start World War III.

If you want straight answers - ask straight questions. If you want soundbites to quote mine then this is the way to go.

Originally posted by Bspiracy
The fact remains that this video has very plain words being used in very plain sentences.

TREASON

reply to post by hooper


Enlighten me where in the video you think it became confused over which issue they were both discussing.

I truly have no idea what you are referring to or at least how or where they possibly became confused over the topic of discussion.

b