posted on Feb, 9 2010 @ 12:52 PM
Originally posted by wmd_2008
911research.wtc7.net...
Have fun
Trust me I have many times, and they use suedo science that you obviously don't understand to make their bogus points.
For example they use the F-4 crash to make their point, when that actually proves my point and the physics I've tried to explain. The F-4 DID NOT
penetrate the concrete, it did what was expected, not two things at once like you want us to believe the 'plane' at the pentagon did. If the F-4
had gone through the concrete, as well as smash to pieces, then it would be a valid point. But it didn't, it followed Newtons laws of physics as I
have explained them. You all still obviously don't get it.
Why not try looking at some physics sites that have nothing to do with 9-11?
I know why, you have no idea how to take the information and put it into context do you? You have to have it spoon fed, shame really cause you have
no idea if what you are reading is true or not, because you don't have the experience and knowledge to know, and you think because it comes from an
'authority' it is the truth. Such is the social conditioning of our society.