IRAN In Farsi Means Aryan. Could The Aryans Be Planning A 911 Strike On 2/11?

When the ambassador of Persia met with Hitler during WW2, Hitler suggested, that to show allegiance, Persia change their name to Aryan. In Farsi, the language of Persia, Aryan means Iran,
Now we have the leader of Iran, who wants to hasten the return of the 12th imam, building nuclear weapons to “vaporize Israel.” His announcement will come this February 11th. Is it a coincidence that it is on the 11th? The worst attack on American soil?
Perhaps it’s time to stock up on supplies people.
Violater1 out.

ps
Read my thread:
www.belowtopsecret.com...
and it will all come clear.

[edit on 7-2-2010 by Violater1]

[edit on 7-2-2010 by Violater1]

[edit on 7-2-2010 by Violater1]

and if israel isnt vapourized on the 11th can we all just forget the "irans gonna nuke us...in 2 weeks" for awhile?

who the hell cares about iran, i cant believe people buy into this propaganda, he never even said he wants to wipe israel of the map, completely misquoted, theyre constantly dealing with imperialists not minding there own business. iran is just as corrupt as the rest of the world.

Originally posted by hans kammler
and if israel isnt vapourized on the 11th can we all just forget the "irans gonna nuke us...in 2 weeks" for awhile?

Your kidding right?
The child has a gun and were just going to walk on by?

Originally posted by edomzer
who the hell cares about iran(sic), i cant believe people buy into this propaganda, he never even said he wants to wipe israel (sic)of the map, completely misquoted, theyre(sic) constantly dealing with imperialists not minding there own business. iran(sic) is just as corrupt as the rest of the world.

His hate filled speeches, included in the reference above are discussed here.
en.wikipedia.org...

sheikyermami.com...

www.jpost.com...

www.opendemocracy.net...

blogs.telegraph.co.uk...

If you need more articles, please use Bing or google.

Yes but thankfully you can’t do much harm on the Internet.

Speaking of the Internet besides fear mongering, war mongering, hate mongering and religious xenophobia what exactly is the purpose of your thread?

Asking a rhetorical question based on some random delusional thought minus any form of coherent case and supporting evidence so you can do all the things listed above?

reply to post by Violater1


Oh, nobody would ever dispute that there is a strong permeating "ideology" that Ahmadinejad is filled with hate and has openly called for the destruction of Israel, denies the holocaust, and other completely false parrotings.

But if you're approaching the matter with healthy skepticism, you'll quickly find that he never said any of these things. Media sympathy of Israel is stronger in the US than it is in Israel, and comments are quickly, easily, and intentionally mistranslated and fed directly into the mainstream media.

Wikipedia is consistently whitewashed of anything negative about Israel. Israeli terrorist (and father of Rahm) Benjamin Emmanuel's page wasn't just whitewashed, it was removed entirely. Even besides that, wikipedia is a poor source for citations of anything.

As for the OP, Iran is no longer run by foreign-imposed leaders. The assertion that Iran will preemptively strike ANYone is ridiculous.

Originally posted by Son of Will
reply to post by Violater1

 

Oh, nobody would ever dispute that there is a strong permeating "ideology" that Ahmadinejad is filled with hate and has openly called for the destruction of Israel, denies the holocaust, and other completely false parrotings.

But if you're approaching the matter with healthy skepticism, you'll quickly find that he never said any of these things. Media sympathy of Israel is stronger in the US than it is in Israel, and comments are quickly, easily, and intentionally mistranslated and fed directly into the mainstream media.

Wikipedia is consistently whitewashed of anything negative about Israel. Israeli terrorist (and father of Rahm) Benjamin Emmanuel's page wasn't just whitewashed, it was removed entirely. Even besides that, wikipedia is a poor source for citations of anything.

As for the OP, Iran is no longer run by foreign-imposed leaders. The assertion that Iran will preemptively strike ANYone is ridiculous.

And these references?
sheikyermami.com...

www.jpost.com...

www.opendemocracy.net...

blogs.telegraph.co.uk...
Are they too discredited?

reply to post by Violater1

His announcement will come this February 11th. Is it a coincidence that it is on the 11th?

No, the 11th is the anniversary of the fall of the Shah's regime.

The royal regime collapsed shortly after on February 11 when guerrillas and rebel troops overwhelmed troops loyal to the Shah in armed street fighting. Iran voted by national referendum to become an Islamic Republic on April 1, 1979,

2/11 will be Khamenei's 9/11 if the opposition can finally do something like take state TV, or convince enough of the army to turn against the regime. Israel will take a pounding from Hezbollah (hopefully not nuclear or biological weapons). I can't see the US homeland being in the line of fire. Although I'm not saying it's impossible, only that it's improbable.

[edit on 7-2-2010 by john124]

reply to post by Violater1


Ancient Iranians used the term Aryan to describe their lineage and their language. When the ancient Persians lived in the Inner Asian Steppes and moved south into today's Iran they named the place Airyanem Vaejah or The Iranian Expanse and today the word survives as Iran . Many present day Iranian boy and girl names reflect this ancient relation: names like Aryana , Iran -dokht (Aryan Daughter), Arayn , Aryan-Pur and Aryaramne.

There's always some confusion in meaning about the name origin of Iran as "land of the Aryans" In fact both Iran and Ireland, for example mean "land of the Aryans". Because of Adolf Hitler's misuse of the word "Aryan", most people now use the term Indo-European. It's believed the first Aryan language was spoken by the people of northern India. The ancient spelling of the word "Iranian" literary means noble in Old Persian and Sanskrit. Noble also literary means a free wo/man in Persian (more of a spiritual freedom than material).

Then there's the supposed "white" master race. This recent mutilation of the meaning of "Aryan" was first caused by anti-Semitism (prejudice against Jews or Judaism). Some early Christian scholars made up the idea of an Aryan race (no evidence, just theories based on their own prejudices) as a means of separating themselves from their Jewish heritage (Christianity began as an extremist Jewish sect). They wanted to believe that they descended from different people than the Jews because of differing religious beliefs. They ignored the fact that the Old Testament of the Christian bible is really just a translation of the Torah/Jewish Hebrew bible).

reply to post by Violater1


Proto has summed it up for you OP.... Very well IMO. I'm not really sure what the WW2 backstory has to do with this, but regardless you claim Iran is building Nukes to attack Israel.. There is no proof whatsoever of Iran making nuclear weapons. Then you say it's time to stock up on supplies. Why?

reply to post by electricveins

Then you say it's time to stock up on supplies. Why?

I would agree it's time for Israeli's, Lebanese, Syrian to stock up on supplies.

Unfortunately Iranian's cannot even afford much beyond a loaf of bread since the regime closed the banks and devalued the currency, so they cannot stock up.

"Could The Aryans Be Planning A 911 Strike On 2/11?"

By this, are you saying the Iranian Government is planning to attack their own citizens on Iranian soil on 2/11? Personally, I don't think the Iranian Government is as vicious and barbaric as some other Governments.

Hard to believe, but not all Governments are into False Flag operations to further their own interests.

What a load of tripe. The term "Aryan" predates Hitler and the Nazi party while variations on "Iran" have been floating around for centuries. "Arya" in Farsi essentially means "of the Iranians", which the real root of "Aryan", while the Sanskrit "Arya", refers to the ancient Indian people. Of course both roots originate from the same source in the cradle of civilization, which is why Hitler adopted in: he was fixated on myths of antediluvian kingdoms. No connection to 2/11 whatsoever.

Might be time to deny ignorance, people.

[edit on 7-2-2010 by Someone336]

Iran and Afghanistan as well as Northern India, still show the remnants of the 'aryan population'. With instances of light hair and eyes, traits that are exclusive to whites, or those with white ancestry. So there is truth to the term 'land of the aryans'.

If you compare Sanskrit (the language of the Vedic Aryans (ancient indians)) it is clearly the root language for English/german latin etc.

this is a source I found quickly showing the relationship between the indo-european languages

en.wikipedia.org...

However this whole Aryan thing is just remnants within the population, it will not cause any political movements thousands of years later.
Is interesting though.