It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
New evidence from astrobiology "overwhelmingly" supports the view that life was seeded from outside Earth, a scientist has claimed.
My theory doesn't conflict with the Professors theory. As I said, I have no idea whether life was artificially seeded on Earth, or naturally. All I'm saying is, at one point, and possibly several other occasions, Aliens came into direct contact with the humans on Earth and I'm fairly certain they did experiments which involved modifying our DNA...I'm still examining evidence and developing hypothesis as to what their intentions were and exactly how and why they modified our DNA...and why they chose to come into direct contact with humans in the first place, which I'm certain they did. Basically, you are correct in saying Earth is "a massive experiment"...Earth is an "Alien Ant Farm" in a sense...that's precisely what I believe to be true...
but I believe this makes more sense
Francis Crick and a chemist Leslie Orgel published a paper in the journal Icarus suggesting that life may have arrived on Earth through a process called 'Directed Panspermia.' 'Directed Panspermia' suggests that life may be distributed by an advanced extraterrestrial civilization. Crick and Orgel argued that DNA encapsulated within small grains could be fired in all directions by such a civilization in order to spread life within the universe.
"It now seems unlikely that extraterrestrial living organisms could have reached the earth either as spores driven by the radiation pressure from another star or as living organisms imbedded in a meteorite. As an alternative to these nineteenth-century mechanisms, we have considered Directed Panspermia, the theory that organisms were deliberately transmitted to the earth by intelligent beings on another planet. We conclude that it is possible that life reached the earth in this way, but that the scientific evidence is inadequate at the present time to say anything about the probability.