Absolute proof: A Pentagon picture montage from start to finish

Originally posted by Thermo Klein
reply to post by Reheat

 

ya, because all the relevant parts are covered by SMOKE!! you ignorantly think something covered by smoke means there's a gigantic HOLE there... but when you look at the pictures not covered by smoke you can clearly see the WALL IS INTACT

What's the difference in obscuration between smoke and water?. I understand why you would be upset as that photo show a better perspective than any you've displayed. However, you're hoping that most truthers who are typically lazy won't click that link and look for themselves.

reply to post by lukeUK


Possibly to do with the generator and the construction work which provided cover for the planting of the charges.

Google Operation Code Angel, Operation Brownstone and Rapid Wall Breaching Kits.

Then see if any of these con artists can answer what punched a round hole in the reinforced, load bearing, shear wall of the stinking C ring.

Here is a partial list of organizations who worked at the Pentagon on 11 Sep 2001 and during days after. Someone/Anyone find 1 person from any of these organizations who have said or will say that no aircraft impacted the Pentagon. Do it!

Conspiracists are afraid to have their fantasies destroyed, so they scrupulously avoid contacting the hundreds of Pentagon 9/11 first responders and the over 8,000 people who worked on rescue, recovery, evidence collection, building stabilization, and security in the days after 9/11. These are just some of the organizations whose members worked on the scene:

Alexandria VA Fire & Rescue, American Airlines, American Red Cross, Arlington County Emergency Medical Services, Arlington County Fire Department, Arlington County Sheriff's Department, Arlington VA Police Department, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms, DiLorenzo TRICARE Health Clinic staff, DeWitt Army Community Hospital staff, District of Columbia Fire & Rescue, DOD Honor Guard, Environmental Protection Agency Hazmat Teams, Fairfax County Fire & Rescue, FBI Evidence Recovery Teams, FBI Hazmat Teams, Federal Aviation Administration, Federal Disaster Medical Assistance Teams, FEMA 68-Person Urban Search and Rescue Teams Maryland Task Force 1, New Mexico Task Force 1, Tennessee Task Force 1, Virginia Task Force 1, Virginia Task Force 2, FEMA Emergency Response Team, Fort Myer Fire Department, Four U.S. Army Chaplains, Metropolitan Airport Authority Fire Unit, Military District of Washington Engineers Search & Rescue Team, Montgomery County Fire & Rescue, U.S. National Guard units, National Naval Medical Center CCRF, National Transportation Safety Board, Pentagon Defense Protective Service, Pentagon Helicopter Crash Response Team, Pentagon Medical Staff, Rader Army Health Clinic Staff, SACE Structural Safety Engineers and Debris Planning and Response Teams, Salvation Army Disaster Services, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, US Army Reserves of Virginia Beach Fairfax County and Montgomery County, Virginia Beach Fire Department, Virginia Department of Emergency Management, Virginia State Police

sites.google.com...

reply to post by Thermo Klein


What about these two:

911research.wtc7.net...

911research.wtc7.net...

You can clearly see the damage. It's not like it's hiding beneath the fire.

Originally posted by Yankee451
reply to post by lukeUK

 

Possibly to do with the generator and the construction work which provided cover for the planting of the charges.

Google Operation Code Angel, Operation Brownstone and Rapid Wall Breaching Kits.

Then see if any of these con artists can answer what punched a round hole in the reinforced, load bearing, shear wall of the stinking C ring.

Oh for crying out loud, another 'googlevestigator'

Originally posted by 911files
[
Oh for crying out loud, another 'googlevestigator'

Seems like a logical place to start if someone has never heard of the operations, doesn't it?

Can you comment on Operation Brownstone and Code Angel please? In your own words, you know, for the readers who are offended by search engines and junk like that.

reply to post by Reheat


I find it easier to believe they would lie than I can believe a plane caused the round hole in the reinforced concrete of the C ring light well wall.

I love it!

We have all the proof and answers for 9/11 and yet they do nothing.

We could find out about anything in the world if only people were not scared to speak up.

There is no way in hell this was done only with a couple of people. This was a huge opperation! SPEAK UP PEOPLE!

Right now.... they are doing it again.... getting ready for the next false flag attack!

Originally posted by Yankee451
reply to post by Reheat

 

I find it easier to believe they would lie than I can believe a plane caused the round hole in the reinforced concrete of the C ring light well wall.

Isn't there like a heavy system in the nose of the plane that could have gone that far? For all we know, it didn't even go completely through and broke apart or something when it hit the C ring wall, making the wall blast out, but not allowing it to pass through. It could be that it had lost enough kinetic energy to kind of equal out against that wall.

Originally posted by dibbs83
I love it!

We have all the proof and answers for 9/11 and yet they do nothing.

We could find out about anything in the world if only people were not scared to speak up.

There is no way in hell this was done only with a couple of people. This was a huge opperation! SPEAK UP PEOPLE!

Right now.... they are doing it again.... getting ready for the next false flag attack!

If you/we have all the proof why are YOU/WE doing nothing? What's stopping you/we?

Want a Pulitzer Prize? Go for it!

Originally posted by Varemia---->isn't there like a heavy system in the nose of the plane that could have gone that far?

Yes, the landing gear.

But if my memory serves me right i've seen a multi disk unit in one of the pictures from the c-ring, indicating that parts of one of the main landing gears might have made it that far.

Originally posted by Varemia

Originally posted by Yankee451
reply to post by Reheat

 

I find it easier to believe they would lie than I can believe a plane caused the round hole in the reinforced concrete of the C ring light well wall.

Isn't there like a heavy system in the nose of the plane that could have gone that far? For all we know, it didn't even go completely through and broke apart or something when it hit the C ring wall, making the wall blast out, but not allowing it to pass through. It could be that it had lost enough kinetic energy to kind of equal out against that wall.

Landing gear perhaps. Thought the nose material itself was carbon fiber or fiberglass, but wouldn't that be the first part to connect with the front face, followed by the "forest of columns"? That's some kinda KE.

Something cut the reinforcement bar though. If it was something solid, it would be massive enough to match the hole. Explosives are a much easier explanation.

reply to post by Ivar_Karlsen



[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/5f7b6014a336.jpg[/atsimg]

www.rense.com...

Originally posted by Yankee451
reply to post by Ivar_Karlsen

 

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/5f7b6014a336.jpg[/atsimg]

www.rense.com...

Where are all of those burn marks ALL around the hole in the C Wall? Why is the top of the C wall straight along the brick joints rather than round like your wall breaching kit hole?

Originally posted by Reheat

Originally posted by Yankee451
reply to post by Ivar_Karlsen

 

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/5f7b6014a336.jpg[/atsimg]

www.rense.com...

Where are all of those burn marks ALL around the hole in the C Wall? Why is the top of the C wall straight along the brick joints rather than round like your wall breaching kit hole?

While you're at it why is the C ring hole noticeably larger than your wall breaching kit example? Is there a small, medium, large, X-large size of wall breaching kits. Inquiring minds want to know.

Originally posted by Reheat

Originally posted by Yankee451
reply to post by Ivar_Karlsen

 

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/5f7b6014a336.jpg[/atsimg]

www.rense.com...

Where are all of those burn marks ALL around the hole in the C Wall? Why is the top of the C wall straight along the brick joints rather than round like your wall breaching kit hole?

Too much damage to the interior to see scorch marks which would be expected in light of Code Angel. If you have any better photos of the interior wall...you know, reallly close shots like they have of the other damage, I'd like to examine them, please post.

The bricks popped out in a straight line because a whole row of bricks was knocked out by the blast? Notice the hole is perpendicular, not angled as would need to be there for the OS. Then there's the pesky missing landing gear, and all that re bar.

Originally posted by Reheat


While you're at it why is the C ring hole noticeably larger than your wall breaching kit example? Is there a small, medium, large, X-large size of wall breaching kits. Inquiring minds want to know.

Seriously? You don't think the military has explosives they could shape to suit the size of the job? Do you use this level of critical thinking when looking for evidence of your planes? Guess so...

reply to post by Varemia


are you joking? This picture is almost entirely obscured by smoke!! It LOOKS like a giant hole because it's obscured by smoke... but when the smoke clears, you get the intact wall.

Picture you linked saying "what about this one" (dark area looks like a hole because it's obscured by smoke)



Same exact area pre-collapse showing that dark area is IN-FACT NOT a hole!



the first picture you linked is far left of the explosion and alleged impact site... all I gotta say... you think an airplane exploded there, yet that dead tree didn't burn up? No.

reply to post by Thermo Klein


Thermo, have you seen this page? Check out the melting pentagon.

septemberclues.info...

Originally posted by 911files
Oh for crying out loud, another 'googlevestigator'

Did you post your investigative work online?

if so, then you just made it worthless... because anyone who reads it is nary a googlevestigator... it's research, your holier than thou attitude is getting old. Try turning in a Doctoral dissertation or DQP without references and see how far you get.