The post above sums it up as well as can be said. It's not that we haven't "looked" at the object. It's more the fact that it hardly reflects any
light. There isn't much to see, no matter what you're looking with. It's an incredibly small body of matter (so to speak) with an incredibly small
amount of light being able to reach it.
Have a friend hold up a grain of sand in the dark. Stand a few feet away and shine a flashlight toward the grain. See any detail? That's why.
Like ZombieOctopus pointed out, even with the best of our telescopes, we;'re basically looking at a pebble in a dark closet. No matter how much we
work at it, it's going to keep on looking like a sad lump of blurry, until we're right next to it.
Here's another way to look at it, using high-school trig:
Say Hubble can see a galaxy 100,000 light years across and 10 billion light years away. The angular width of that galaxy would be ~2 seconds of arc
(1 second of arc is 1/60th of 1/60 of a degree. The full moon is ~1/2 degree or 1800 seconds of arc).
Pluto is 2274km across and 4.48 billion km away. Its disk subtends only 0.1 seconds of arc, or 1/20th of the apparent width of a galaxy 10 billion
light years away.
That is why it is so hard to resolve any detail on Pluto's surface.