posted on Feb, 5 2010 @ 03:14 PM
reply to post by milesp
Well, you're close with your criticism, except for the right to make medical decisions part.
The constitution is a bill of negative powers to the federal and state governments.
Unless the constitution explicitly grants congress the authority to run a healthcare system, it is unconstitutional for it to do so.
The 9th amendment secures the right to private medical care to the people.
The 10th amendment secures all governance over such medical care to the states and to the people.
At most, congress could regulate (keep regular) medical care that crosses state lines, but since very few people actually leave the state they are in
to seek care, such legislation would be fairly meaningless.
[edit on 5-2-2010 by mnemeth1]