posted on Feb, 4 2010 @ 04:08 PM
After spending sometime reading through the ATS posts on disclosure, they do seem to all support a fairy consistent point of view: the government
cover-up of alien contact and/or advanced technology is wrong and we need to have disclosure. Lets call this the bad government hypothesis, you
know, just so we have something to refer to it by.
But we are supposed to deny ignorance on ATS, and quite frankly endorsing the bad government hypothesis without thinking through possible alternative
seems to me to be sort of.. well ignorant. So what would a contrary “good government” hypothesis look like.
For the rest of this post, I shall lay out an alternative hypothesis that suggests that disclosure would be catastrophic, that we desperately need
a government cover-up, and the government has acted correctly and responsibly in engaging in a cover-up and disinformation rather than entertaining
disclosure.
I should be very clear that I'm not claiming any of this is true, or that there actually exists any evidence to suggest that this is really the way
things are – this is more of a thought exercise, an attempt to partly answer the question “Have we thought this disclosure thing all the way
through?”
Assumption Number One – The Technology
We will start by assuming that the government is in possession of either science or technology that is being suppressed. This technology could be many
things from an unlimited power source, to teleportation, to some kind of science that allows anti-gravity or warping space-time. Where this
technology comes from is unimportant . It might be extra-terrestrial and acquired via a Roswell type incident or through negotiated trade with
extra-terrestrials. It might also be a human development from the alternative science of the Nazis, or reproducing the science of some ancient human
civilization. Or perhaps it's just one of those breakthroughs made by a hard working (and very surprised) scientist working late at night and who
just happens to notice something that makes him go “hmmmm that's odd.”
Assumption Number Two – The Cover-up
At least one government and maybe more acting individually or in cooperation, have classified this technology to the highest levels of secrecy. All
reference to it are expunged. Anyone who digs too deep is “disappeared” and anyone who looks like they may be replicating the technology is
recruited and taken black. The technology continues to be developed in secret. To hide it, the governments build disinformation campaigns with
staged abductions or sightings of black triangles to hide legitimate incidents of possible disclosure among a pile of wide-eyes hysterical reports of
anal probes, mutilated cattle, underground bases and other fantastic concoctions. People die and governments are overthrown so that the secret can be
kept.
Assumption Number Three – The Threat
Why the cover-up? Suppose that this technology is simple. Radically different from anything else but still simple. Or suppose that it points to an
elegant reformulation of science that makes this technology engineer-able by just about anyone. What could be wrong with that? Everyone with their
own zero-point energy device in their basement that they can make out our stuff you can buy at WalMart? But what if, with just a bit of tinkering,
that same device can be modified to produce a 50 megaton explosion, or rip a hole in spacetime, or generate an energy pulse that will kill every
living thing for 25 miles. And you can make it out of things that you buy at WalMart.
What if Al-qaeda got their hands on this technology? What if a paranoid but brilliant engineer who heard voices telling him to cleanse the earth got
their hands on it? What if by allowing the slightest hint of the existence of this technology to be known, you were almost guaranteeing mass death
and destruction.
Assumption Number Four – The Response
The only safe thing to do is to hide it. The Americans, the Russians, the French and the Chinese and whoever else. They all know that this is
several levels above MAD because every government is doomed if even one lets slip the secret.
And in the meantime, you devote resources to the technology. You look for a way to control it, to make it safe or to defend against it and
neutralize the threat. You don't dare incorporate it into your normal “defense” technology since you can't afford to risk it. Instead you keep
developing standard weapons to divert attention away from speculation about black technologies. And you keep the cover-up going.
Just trying to think about this from a different angle folks. Again, for those of you who might have missed it, I'm not claiming this is the case,
nor do I “believe” in it. It is important for us to always keep an open mind and be prepared to entertain all possibilities, not just the ones
that we personally find appealing.
[edit on 4-2-2010 by metamagic]