It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jackflap
reply to post by SLAYER69
Could this be the result of your first hand experiences? If so maybe you should move
Are you suggesting the individual move to or from? I found your reply to be confusing and figured I'd run it by you.
Originally posted by antonia
Originally posted by JJay55
You don't know Iran doesn't have a nuke. Intelligent says otherwise.
Why would they bomb Israel right now? Maybe they will wait until February 11th. But thank you for confirming their plan.
Do you mean "Intelligence". American intelligence has never confirmed a nuke. It has confirmed various programs intended to acquire a nuke but no finished nuke. If there was a nuke Obama would ride it all the way to the finish line to get whatever he wants out of congress. The neo-cons would be unleashing organismic screams about how it proves all they were right. Considering this announcement is made every year and nothing happens, I think most of you are making a mountain out of a molehill.
U.S. intelligence has concluded that the document published recently by the Times of London, which purportedly describes an Iranian plan to do experiments on what the newspaper described as a "neutron initiator" for an atomic weapon, is a fabrication, according to a former Central Intelligence Agency official. Philip Giraldi, who was a CIA counterterrorism official from 1976 to 1992, told IPS that intelligence sources say that the United States had nothing to do with forging the document, and that Israel is the primary suspect. The sources do not rule out a British role in the fabrication, however.
Originally posted by Dr UAE
reply to post by JJay55
first of all i want to apologize if what im doing right now is being off topic,but i had to clarify things here.
and to JJay55,now we are talking , Laylat al-Qadr now i know what your talking about, and yes its only in the last ten days of Ramadan,actually its one of the last ten days and no muslim knows which day it is,and the first verse of the quran that was given to the prophet, was on that night, and it is mentioned in the quran too:
[97][1] Verily! We have sent it (this Qur'ân) down in the night of Al-Qadr (Decree)
[2] And what will make you know what the night of Al-Qadr (Decree) is?
[3] The night of Al-Qadr (Decree) is better than a thousand months (i.e. worshiping Allâh in that night is better than worshiping Him a thousand months, i.e. 83 years and 4 months).
[4] Therein descend the angels and the Rûh (Jibrîl (Gabriel)) by Allâh's Permission with all Decrees,
[5] (All that night), there is Peace (and Goodness from Allâh to His believing slaves) until the appearance of dawn.
i hope that answers your question
and i do apologize again if i was off topic
Originally posted by jackflap
Are you suggesting the individual move to or from? I found your reply to be confusing and figured I'd run it by you.
Originally posted by SLAYER69
Originally posted by jackflap
Are you suggesting the individual move to or from? I found your reply to be confusing and figured I'd run it by you.
Well if those are his first hand experiences and many here on ATS know that the vast majority of the issues he pointed out occur in the inner cities. [I'm not saying limited to] but mostly. He should move to some of the many locations in the US where that's not an issue.
As far as Sex and Violence on our TV.
There is always the channel selector.
Originally posted by JJay55
reply to post by cushycrux
Anti-war.com is kooky Pat Robertson. He blabs his mouth when he shouldn't then the MSM has to cover up for him. He's a boob.
No one knows what the US intel is on Iran's nukes, many analysts have already said that they are armed.
"Can't you be accused of hyping this threat?" Bush was asked at a news conference a day after his administration released a new National Intelligence Estimate concluding that Iran halted its nuclear weapons program in 2003. "I was made aware of the NIE last week," Bush replied. But it was his next remark that drew attention from Democrats, the news media and intelligence experts: "In August, I think it was (U.S. intelligence chief) Mike McConnell came in and said, 'We have some new information.' He didn't tell me what the information was." Increasingly strident U.S. rhetoric over Iran's nuclear program reached a peak on October 17 when Bush warned that a nuclear-armed Iran could lead to World War Three. A day later, Vice President Dick Cheney announced his own warning of "serious consequences" for Iran if it refused to abandon its nuclear activities. The comments stirred fears of a possible U.S. military confrontation with Iran and helped send world oil prices soaring toward the $100 a barrel mark.
Originally posted by antonia
Originally posted by JJay55
reply to post by cushycrux
Anti-war.com is kooky Pat Robertson. He blabs his mouth when he shouldn't then the MSM has to cover up for him. He's a boob.
No one knows what the US intel is on Iran's nukes, many analysts have already said that they are armed.
Pat Robertson does not own and is not affiliated with Antiwar.com.
Originally posted by JJay55
reply to post by cushycrux
Lame. You are getting details days after they actually happen and reported by MSM. And then the details are simply from writers.
I would suggest some reliable sources but.... nah.... not worth it.