It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Terrorists 'plan attack on Britain with bombs INSIDE their bodies' to foil new airport scanners

page: 3
6
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 31 2010 @ 10:31 AM
link   

Originally posted by above
Why surgically? As already stated here, the rectum would be an ideal place to hide the explosives. The amount you could easily stash there would blow up a plane, no question about that, even if using low-grade explosives.

One would not even need a detonator, many explosives go off by hitting them hard. They would only need to go to the toilet, rip it out, and take something hard and hit the bomb to make it go kaboom.

There just is no way of preventing "terrorists" from taking explosives onboard.

There was already someone stopped for having a device with wires up his butt. He said it was a cancer curing thing and let go on his way. But that was a dry run to see if rectum objects would get through. Then they had to go with plan B, surgically implants.



posted on Jan, 31 2010 @ 10:35 AM
link   
They are not terrorists. That is a label we have been deceived into using through Taqqiya.

Al Queada does not exist. It is a boogie man sent to deceive us into ignoring the jihad.

They are muslims spreading Islam through violent and non-violent jihad. You can be dhimmis if you like. Or you can stop eating their lie and defend your civilization.



posted on Jan, 31 2010 @ 10:35 AM
link   
Ok, hey, you've convinced me: it's not safe to get in a plane

So I won't

And nor will most others

It will be great. Less planes means clearer air, meaning we'll be able to spot the Chemtrail planes far more easily

Less planes will mean less noise and that WILL be great


We've been warned that it's not safe to fly

We've been warned by the EXPERTS

to stay off planes

because they are the MOST dangerous things on earth right now


Maybe in ten or twenty years, people might be convinced to fly again

maybe not

In the meantime, the public will save money

and all these bombers will become redundant and will have to retrain as hairdressers and chefs and dog-trainers

I'm fine with that



posted on Jan, 31 2010 @ 10:41 AM
link   
The people you are talking about are often very well educated.

The people on the planes, the people on the train system, all well educated people.

You seem to think that brown means uneducated. Several of the people arrested as terrorists have been doctors. One of them is a nuclear scientist.


Originally posted by ROBL240
Yeah because surgery is something so simple, even a unqualified doctor in the middle of a cave could do it. I know Pacemaker patients who risk having collapsed lungs from even a simple routine op, and the device itself is no larger than a bottle cap (although weighs a bit more obviously.) Yet were to believe that explosives can be planted inside someones body, patched up, and they can be on their merry way across half the world to blow up a target. Theyd be dead before they'd even leave the Cave.



posted on Jan, 31 2010 @ 11:01 AM
link   
reply to post by MaxBlack
 


I believe that these excessively intrusive security measures are what have been killing the airline industry. Not only do you have to do obscenely ridiculous things like remove your shoes, you have to get to the airport another 1/2 hour plus early. Unless you are flying a really long distance it is not worth it at all.

My idea of airport security would be passing out a small caliber loaded handgun to all the passengers who were born in the country who won't be drinking, which they can return upon arrival. That solves most of the problem right there.



posted on Jan, 31 2010 @ 11:07 AM
link   
I can't really see this working...

For one thing a foreign entity such as a bomb in the body will be rejected by the human form, causing all manner of illness and pain.

A post-op person carrying a bomb inside them will not be in the peak of health and despite the scare tactics i can't imagine they will be able to hold a bomb inside them for longer than a day without dropping dead of all sorts of terrible complications caused by chemical reactions etc etc.

And then what? Will the bomb even work after being drowned in blood, fat and body fluid?




posted on Jan, 31 2010 @ 11:10 AM
link   
reply to post by truthquest
 


I like it


If there were more like you, no-one would have the hide to generate headlines out of these B-grade movie scenarios

Congratulations, for being sane and intelligent. God bless your genes and may they multiply



posted on Jan, 31 2010 @ 11:11 AM
link   
reply to post by nerbot
 


I think it's bs....

For one these guys & girls shouldn't even be able to get a flight (especially if they are on a watchlist or are flying from certain Country's)... i wouldn't be able to understand if a bomb went off on a plane now with all this security... it just wouldn't make sense....

Me thinks we already have those Radicals living here... all they have to do is start doing what they do in Baghdad and blow themselves on a bus or train... they are probably planning something as we speak and yet our Government will let them reside here....



posted on Jan, 31 2010 @ 11:13 AM
link   
Anybody considered that once the Airline Industry is crippled by

safety measures. "Terrorist can start riding trains, buses , go to Baseball

Games, Subways, office buildings......

The Bogeyman is everywhere ooooo



posted on Jan, 31 2010 @ 11:17 AM
link   
reply to post by Sean48
 


Yep, that's true and we have considered it

So we're staying at home. Going nowhere. Spending next to nothing

That's what the fearmongers want, that's what they'll get

Then we can sit back and watch it all collapse to the point the corporations will start attacking each other

When they're done and they're all dead

we might think about stepping outside our doors and spending a cent or two

Or maybe not. Dropping-out and turning off the whore media is peaceful and pleasant



posted on Jan, 31 2010 @ 11:47 AM
link   
No surprise and they obviously watched that episode from "Spooks"(a show about MI5) and got the idea from the female bomber on there that was tasked to kill a prince and world leaders.

They are cowards instead of fighting conventionally they commit beheadings,suicide bombings and IED strikes.. although i do have sympathy for the fact their lands have been taken by America and NATO(if that happened to Britain i would commit guerilla actions against the occupier).

But their actions only create more hate in the world, if they could sit around a table and talk about it diplomatically and if Israel actually become open minded instead of killing innocent people we may actually get progress in the Middle east.

It's going to be a long road and the 2010's will create more wars and potentiallya world war between China,Russia,USA,Israel,Iran,Lebanon,Syria,N Korea,Yemen and NATO

biggest threat is China+Russia teaming up against the west..

China is the new USA and are currently fighting a proxy war with AFRICOM.
They shwoed their naval might last year and it is bigger than the US Navy and with 11 aircraft carriers on the way and a reform of the air force, China has been to quiet in recent years... the stage is set..

who will make the first move?


[edit on 17/05/09 by Raider of Truth]



posted on Jan, 31 2010 @ 11:59 AM
link   
I was reading, just thinking, has anyone actually ever seen a terrorist? And I don't mean the stereotype either. It's like they are invisible beings that just come out of nowhere and blow things up. Kind of like cops hiding to pull you over. I mean, we see pictures and video of the war. But if someone invaded my country and started killing people, I imagine that I would be on their tv sets labeled as a terrorist too.
Basically, I'm just questioning the reality of the "terrorists" and even their "threat". Because, we don't see them, they're just there...because the government says they are. Besides that, it's common knowledge that the CIA created Al Qaeda, is the CIA no a part of our government? It all seems real fishy to me.

As far as putting bombs inside your body tho, I could see that happening. Like putting drugs up your butt trying to smuggle them somewhere. Just shove a bomb up there with a timer on it.

[edit on 31-1-2010 by sr_robert1]



posted on Jan, 31 2010 @ 12:22 PM
link   
reply to post by nerbot
 


To me Homeland Security's reactions are semi-funny.

Now, shoe bomber; "Take off your shoes before boarding".
Now, bomb in the underwear; "Drop your pants".

Future, After bomb in a coconut; "Sir, do you have any coconuts?" Answer; "No just this water melon". Reply; "Okay, go right ahead. Have a great flight".

Sheeeeesh..........

yak055h



posted on Jan, 31 2010 @ 12:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by Raider of Truth
No surprise and they obviously watched that episode from "Spooks"(a show about MI5) and got the idea from the female bomber on there that was tasked to kill a prince and world leaders.

They are cowards instead of fighting conventionally they commit beheadings,suicide bombings and IED strikes.. although i do have sympathy for the fact their lands have been taken by America and NATO(if that happened to Britain i would commit guerilla actions against the occupier).

But their actions only create more hate in the world, if they could sit around a table and talk about it diplomatically and if Israel actually become open minded instead of killing innocent people we may actually get progress in the Middle east.

It's going to be a long road and the 2010's will create more wars and potentiallya world war between China,Russia,USA,Israel,Iran,Lebanon,Syria,N Korea,Yemen and NATO

biggest threat is China+Russia teaming up against the west..

China is the new USA and are currently fighting a proxy war with AFRICOM.
They shwoed their naval might last year and it is bigger than the US Navy and with 11 aircraft carriers on the way and a reform of the air force, China has been to quiet in recent years... the stage is set..

who will make the first move?


[edit on 17/05/09 by Raider of Truth]


So you think these "criminal masterminds" get their ideas for "terrorist attacks" from YOUR TV shows?

Right now, any type of "terrorist attack" simply GUARANTEES an immediate and devastating invasion by the US. Why would anyone in the world think it's going to help them out to do this? And for that matter, since everyone is going nutty about "airplane hijackings" why wouldn't the "criminal masterminds" USE SOME OTHER TACTICS. There are a million other ways to pull off "terrorist attacks" without using airplanes. In fact, if these "terrorists" did exist, why wouldn't they try to blow up something worthwhile, like Guy Fawkes? Taking out all the govt politicians in one fell swoop?

But no, they have some kooky religion that makes them do stuff against their best interest all the time. And they watch TV shows to get their ideas on what to do. And they just love to blow up airplanes, because they are jealous of the Americans having invented them.



posted on Jan, 31 2010 @ 01:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by sr_robert1
I was reading, just thinking, has anyone actually ever seen a terrorist? And I don't mean the stereotype either. It's like they are invisible beings that just come out of nowhere and blow things up. Kind of like cops hiding to pull you over. I mean, we see pictures and video of the war. But if someone invaded my country and started killing people, I imagine that I would be on their tv sets labeled as a terrorist too.
Basically, I'm just questioning the reality of the "terrorists" and even their "threat". Because, we don't see them, they're just there...because the government says they are. Besides that, it's common knowledge that the CIA created Al Qaeda, is the CIA no a part of our government? It all seems real fishy to me.

As far as putting bombs inside your body tho, I could see that happening. Like putting drugs up your butt trying to smuggle them somewhere. Just shove a bomb up there with a timer on it.

[edit on 31-1-2010 by sr_robert1]

Yes, I have seen a terrorist in person.
Have you been to places where terrorists hang out? Do you work in law enforcement? Are you in the military?



posted on Jan, 31 2010 @ 02:05 PM
link   

Originally posted by nerbot

Terrorists 'plan attack on Britain with bombs INSIDE their bodies' to foil new airport scanners


www.dailymail.c o.uk

Britain is facing a new Al Qaeda terror threat from suicide ‘body bombers’ with explosives surgically inserted inside them.

Until now, terrorists have attacked airlines, underground trains and buses by secreting bombs in bags, shoes or underwear to avoid detection.

But an operation by MI5 has uncovered evidence that Al Qaeda is planning a new stage in its terror campaign by inserting ‘surgical bombs’ inside people for the first time.
(visit the link for the full news article)



I wrote and warned about this new method YEARS AGO !!!!

High explosives sealed inside plastic enclosures surgically implanted
into leg or thigh muscles, stomachs, derriere regions, inside the colon,
or in the case of women, uterine and breast implants !!!!

I GUARANTEE THIS WILL HAPPEN SOONER OR LATER
because you cannot expect highly proficient groups such as
Al Quaeda to sit still!

And if you want a NON-metallic detonator....you do a binary chemical
detonation system that uses body acids to slowly eat away at a plastic
type pouch that contains two reactants that provide an endothermic
reaction which can then cause a primary and secondary ignition
of a larger implanted explosive device.

By varying the thickness of the plastic pouching and testing against
an individual person`s body acids, timing can be approximately controlled
to within a few hours plus or minus.

For explosives that require impact, the same `Body Acid Timer`could
be used to ignite an explosive compression tube made out of hard plastic
tubing which slams a hardened plastic plug against the secondary
explosive to cause the larger detonation

The world is a NASTY place FULL of people who DO know what
they're doing when it comes to causing mayhem...I live in Vancouver BC
home of the 2010 Winter Olympics in February, and unfortunately
I AM EXPECTING that a terrorist event WILL HAPPEN here...I don`t
know where or how or when, BUT I DO KNOW as someone who has
some expertise in the Intelligence field, that the 2010 Olympics is too high
of a profile of an event to pass up....I hope it doesn't happen
but I would NOT BE SURPRISED if it did!!!!!!!

And I do know that the security system around the venues themselves
ARE VERY WELL thought out...so my expectation will be what we
see Middle East of attacks on busses, stores, shopping malls, possibly
schools or non-competition sporting areas where lots of people
gather but where there is a low level of overt security or access control.

It's pretty sad for me to write this missive, knowing it may be quoted
in the news, but unfortunately we live in times where there are some
SERIOUSLY DESPERATE and IDEOLOGICALLY EXPRESSIVE people
who are WILLING to sacrifice their lives at OUR EXPENSE.

There is no real solution to terrorist attacks of this type
without do two things: Offering A Carrot AND Threatening a Big Stick!

1) We get OUT of the Middle East and let them figure it out themselves
as they deal with THEIR OWN PROBLEMS in their OWN WAY!
We'll only offer basic street-level help such as micro-finance
and logistical help.

2) The stick: The Threat of an INSTANT and DEVASTATING
military response from the skies above if we are EVER attacked again!

[edit on 2010/1/31 by StargateSG7]

[edit on 2010/1/31 by StargateSG7]



posted on Jan, 31 2010 @ 02:07 PM
link   
I'm a bit skeptical of the explosive force you'd get detonating a bomb from inside your torso. The human body is meat and water, I would think a large portion of the explosive potential would be dissipated in forcing all that away. If anything, you'd make yourself into pipe bomb, spraying bone shrapnel everywhere, but I kind of doubt you could rip a hole in a plane.



posted on Jan, 31 2010 @ 02:21 PM
link   
Either way - the world is getting ugly...

Imagine being born into this!

'What's that Daddy?'

'He had a bomb in his stomach'



posted on Jan, 31 2010 @ 02:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by ZombieOctopus
I'm a bit skeptical of the explosive force you'd get detonating a bomb from inside your torso. The human body is meat and water, I would think a large portion of the explosive potential would be dissipated in forcing all that away. If anything, you'd make yourself into pipe bomb, spraying bone shrapnel everywhere, but I kind of doubt you could rip a hole in a plane.


In a plane you would not have to have as much force as you may think. The overpressure of the blast would be all that is needed to blow out windows and rip a hole. Remember the skin on those planes is not much thicker than a beer can. Below is a chart showing the overpressure of common explosives and the damages. And remember a plane is a closed in area and the pressure has to go somewhere.

Compound Pressure Effects
RDX/C4 10 Psi *Reinforced concrete buildings severely damaged
Severe heart and lung damage
Limbs can be blown off

ANFO 4 Psi *Most buildings collapse except except concrete buildings
Injuries universal
Fatalities occur

KClo3 2 Psi *Residential structures collapse
Brick walls destroyed
Injuries common
Fatalities may occur



posted on Jan, 31 2010 @ 02:40 PM
link   
reply to post by ZombieOctopus
 


It doesn't take much to rip a hole in the side of a plane!

Stop watching Hollywood movies were they have shootouts
on planes and no damage is done to the plane, in reality it
is very different.







 
6
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join