posted on Jan, 25 2010 @ 12:31 PM
Two Bronx men free after 'drugs' turn out to be candy
Two Bronx men were locked up and left to rot in a filthy jail cell for nearly a week after a pair of cops mistook their candy for a bag of crack.
The "drugs" were finally tested five days later and determined to be popular Coco (coconut) Candy. The charges were dropped
Read more at the original post
Two Bronx men free after
'drugs' turn out to be candy
Apparently the cops just assumed it was crack in spite of the pleas of the men at the time of arrest to test the candy with a field drug kit. This
story bothers me for three reasons.
1. There appears to be an assumption of infallibility showing up more and more on the part of police -- they sometimes act highly inappropriately
because they don't check basic facts. In this case, I'm sure that this is NOT the procedure that police are supposed to follow in the field. This
time, it resulted in a stint in jail, yet how many other times has it resulted in injury or death to innocent and law-abiding citizens? We have police
procedures for a reason -- the Western Democracies are supposed to be nations of laws and principles, not the wild west were lawmen shoot it out on a
"gut feeling."
2. This is a waste of law enforcement resources. You have to wonder how much time is spent correcting the mistakes that are made by LEOs not
following rules of conduct and how much resources are spent on restitution and on processing innocent people for crimes they did not commit. Meanwhile
the serious crimes overwhelm law enforcement resources.
3. Continued misbehaviour like this on the part of law enforcement has led to a mistrust of police in many countries, especially among youth. The
"don't snitch" grass roots campaign may be on the surface anti-social, but perhaps it would not have flourished as it did if there had not been a
climate of mistrust of the police. Reinforcing the perceptions of the community that police think of the public as the enemy and are there to enforce
and intimidate rather than serve and protect is having the effect of eroding public confidence and support of the police.
Decades ago when I was in University, I can think of several occasions where a police officer was often in a bit of a spot (usually alone and trying
to settle down an unruly mob of drunken engineering students or trying to manage traffic while responding to an accident) and would appeal to
bystanders for assistance. There never seemed to be a moment's hesitation on the part of bystanders to lend assistance. I have been told by a
number of younger people I work with nowadays that if a cop requested their assistance, they would flee for fear of their own safety or that the
police officer was trying to trick them somehow, but they would respond if a firefighter made the same request. I fear that the erosion of public
support for police will polarize our society even more and place police in even more physical danger.
[edit on 25-1-2010 by metamagic]