It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GoldenFleece
Originally posted by AllSeeingI
What better way to invade then to create a seemingly natural disaster which ruins the target government and infrastructure to a point where they will be BEGGING to be invaded and occupied.
Yep, another example of the Hegelian Dialectic -- problem/reaction/solution.
Oldest trick in the book.
Originally posted by LiteraryOneTwo
While I do not believe that Haarp had a thing to do with the earthquake or its aftermath, I do believe that the spiral of light that appeared over Norway was attributed to the Russian version of Haarp.
The sad truth is that so far nobody yet has ever been able to warn communities in advance about coming earthquakes, and even the after shocks while expected do not seem to cause any kind of prevention either.
Sooner or later, perhaps man will respect mother nature enough to really build to withstand sudden events like earthquakes.
Trial and error experiments such as evidently employed by Haarp are probably not in the best interest of society at large. Chernobyl is proof enough of that.
Originally posted by LiteraryOneTwo
While I do not believe that Haarp had a thing to do with the earthquake or its aftermath, I do believe that the spiral of light that appeared over Norway was attributed to the Russian version of Haarp.
The sad truth is that so far nobody yet has ever been able to warn communities in advance about coming earthquakes, and even the after shocks while expected do not seem to cause any kind of prevention either.
Sooner or later, perhaps man will respect mother nature enough to really build to withstand sudden events like earthquakes.
Trial and error experiments such as evidently employed by Haarp are probably not in the best interest of society at large. Chernobyl is proof enough of that.
Originally posted by GorehoundLarry
Haiti was and still is prone to Earthquakes.
Why does no one understand this?
Originally posted by Titen-Sxull
reply to post by antideceit
I can respect distrust of government but it's one thing to distrust them and another entirely to believe they can control natural disasters and are willing to use that control to devestate an already impoverished nation and cost thousands of lives and probably Billions of dollars in the process.
If you think about it logically it makes no sense even IF the government has a natural disaster creating super-machine, why wouldn't they use it on an ENEMY of the nation, why use it on the poor Haitian people?
In 1915 Nikola Tesla already released an interview to the New York Times in which it asserted that it was possible to alter the ionosphere. Varying the frequencies and the exposure times, the following results can be obtained:
- to influence in drastic way on the atmospheric weather;
- to provoke earthquakes;
- to interfere with the cerebral waves of men and animals;
- to generate nuclear bursts without fall-out;
- to scan the tomography of the Earth;
- to irradiate heat in bunkers even situated to great depths;
- to eliminate the communications on immense specific areas
Originally posted by Zeus2573
reply to post by Imagir
I too am a firm believer that this earthquake in Haiti and many others were caused by some sort of "technologically advanced" weapon. They can't be happening naturally. Isn't it funny how the majority of the quakes that occur these day's seems to only be happening in poor or impoverished countries? Believe it or not the PTB see these people as nothing more than "useless eaters".
[edit on 20-1-2010 by Zeus2573]