It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by davesidious
reply to post by EvolvedMinistry
Because you don't know what electromagnetic radiation is, and how it's everywhere, used for everything?
We have two options here, which is the most likely?
1. HAARP is some secret super-weapon, the product of a massive conspiracy between hundreds of scientists, hundreds of engineers, the US government, BAE Advanced Technologies, and the University of Alaska, using some hitherto unknown physics
or
2. You don't know what you're talking about.
Occam's razor suggests you don't know what you're talking about.
Originally posted by Sean48
Originally posted by EvolvedMinistry
I'm sorry Dave, can't hear you above all the information I posted and was rewarded for. Thanks for commenting on this thread and helping to keep it alive. You've been wonderful!!!
Congrats on your applause sir.
You realize that you were "applauded" for your tireless effort, and not because
it was correct.
I will give my personal applause to you (it seems to make your day)
This is how we learn, try, fail, learn,...try , fail, learn.
Anyway , after reading the Meat of the thread, I will say you did not prove
HAARP a weapon, as much as you Wished it was.
Originally posted by davesidious
reply to post by EvolvedMinistry
Your ignorance is STAGGERING. Hahahahaha! I'm sorry, I can't stop laughing at how ridiculous your 'logic' is. Those weapons are not even remotely similar in setup to HAARP, short of they all use electromagnetic radiation. But guess what - almost everything we use does, from paper, to computers, to factories, to TVs, to the internet, EVERYTHING.
You clearly don't understand the words you are using.
Hint: take a look at the frequencies used by those weapons, and the frequencies used by harp. Then look at the antennae involved. Clearly you didn't have good science lessons at school.
Oh, and by the way, I don't need to provide a shred of evidence, as I'm not the one making the claims. All the evidence to back up my position is on the HAARP website. Its equipment is explained, its goals are explained, and there is a fantastic amount of data. You are the one who needs to show evidence that HAARP is not what it's claimed to be, and so far you have hilariously failed to do that (but, you have shown direct evidence that you have no idea what you're talking about, which I thank you for profusely).
Originally posted by davesidious
reply to post by _SilentAssassin_
And? That's evidence of anything other than people making claims?
reply to post by EvolvedMinistry
You haven't brought any research to the table, you've just grasped some new words you've not heard before, put them into google, and posted back the results, even though the only thing they demonstrate is your insurmountable ignorance. I don't even think you know what the word "research" means!
As I've said, I don't have to provide any evidence, as I'm not trying to prove anything. You are the one flying in the face of science and claiming that some unknown form of physics is at play in turning HAARP into a weapon of some sort.
Get a grip. You make the claims, you provide the evidence. It's called critical thinking, and is something you clearly are lacking. Those are not insults, those are the truth.
Deny ignorance - start with yourself. You clearly need it.
I can keep this thread going indefinitely, as I'm not the one looking ridiculously foolish by showing the world just how little I know about science (and a fantastic arrogance that prohibits learning). That's all you.
Originally posted by davesidious
reply to post by Donny 4 million
That's not evidence, that is taken from a transcript, is poorly-worded, and if you read the transcript you'll see he's talking about people engaging in research into those weapons, not that the weapons exist.
It doesn't matter how many times you repeat that claim, it doesn't make it true.
Originally posted by davesidious
reply to post by Donny 4 million
That's not evidence, that is taken from a transcript, is poorly-worded, and if you read the transcript you'll see he's talking about people engaging in research into those weapons, not that the weapons exist.
It doesn't matter how many times you repeat that claim, it doesn't make it true.
Originally posted by triplescorpio
reply to post by EvolvedMinistry
understood i have become very ranty on certain topics there just so much BS floating around it erks me to no end. I hear the most outrageous concepts accepted as truth and the only logic pushed aside so the 9-11 ers dont feel alone their like a gang and to me its time to call them out for real go easy mreind hope to see you around ats in the future.
O by the way i do beleive there is more to haarp then meets the eye i do beleive it can do bad things to our ionesphere and should not be allowed to operate.
I have yet to read anything to prove we could actually cause an Earthquake would be cool though that kind of energy.
As Always Be Well