It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Asktheanimals
It's a coatimundi. Their range is south texas to bolivia, where they found was just a bit north of the normal range.
It seems every dead animal someone finds without hair is the next chupacabra
Keep trying, maybe they'll actually find one someday.
Originally posted by Asktheanimals
It's a coatimundi. Their range is south texas to bolivia, where they found was just a bit north of the normal range.
It seems every dead animal someone finds without hair is the next chupacabra
Keep trying, maybe they'll actually find one someday.
Wildlife biologist Jennifer Barrow measures the rear feet of a small, hairless creature laid out on a picnic table.
"The pad is the giveaway," she says.
Barrow has seen feet and claws exactly like this many times; teeth, too. She puts a section of jawbone down next to the animal's head for comparison.
"This tooth right here is this tooth right here," she says. "It matches perfectly."
"The feet are raccoon feet. The skull is a raccoon skull. Dental formula matches raccoon dental formula. It's a raccoon," Barrow concluded.
"This is just an anomaly of a common species,"
Originally posted by Aggie Man
I have no opinion on this one. I have always maintained that the Chupacabra is simply a mangy coyote. BUT, the pictures and video of this one do seem quite different than previous chupacabra carcasses. Here is the link...you decide for yourselves:
www.kens5.com...
Enjoy!
[edit on 19-1-2010 by Aggie Man]
nstead of being vicious, fanged creatures that supposedly drink the blood of livestock, chupacabras turn out to be wild dogs inflicted with a deadly form of mange, according to University of Michigan biologist Barry OConnor.