It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Gemwolf
There are so many things wrong with this, I don't even know where to start...
1. Do a quick Google search on Gentill Abdulla and you'll quickly see that he is a "self-proclaimed genius"... There are no actual physicists that backs him up on his ideas.
2. Looking at some of his interactions on discussion boards such as this one you'll find that he's missing a few concepts about science and he also have a few misconceptions when it comes to the stuff he actually knows something about.
3. His theory is full of holes, such as mentioned above. Surely he must give an explanation as to why he wants to use blue light. And why it has to be 1,000 years old. Why not 999 years. Or 1,001? (And good luck finding a light source like that.)
4. The idea that black holes = time travel is popular science fiction.
And so on...
The bottom line is that it's a young boy with make-believe ideas. Which is a good thing. Some of our greatest minds began their best work at young ages. At this point our friend theory is a far fetched fantasy.
On a side note, a diagram to help explain his theory...
Originally posted by watcher73
Originally posted by constantwonder
Hmmm
there is a ton of evidence that it is possible which is why serious physicist entertain the idea.
Looks like you are confusing ideas with evidence. -5
And i do enjoy endusing seizures in small minded folks aswell, thanks for noticing my great avatar. . .
[edit on 19-1-2010 by constantwonder]
You cant even spell inducing correctly and call me small minded. I am so small minded that I disappeared your profile picture from my screen .06 seconds after I mentioned it being annoying.
It's like I traveled back in time and prevented you from putting it up.
So genius, if time travel is possible, and time is infinite, where are the time travelers from the future?
They dont exist because time travel is impossible. Most people like you confuse Back To The Future "type" time travel with what is actually space travel or traveling faster than light.
Bending light wont bend time or enable you to travel through it. Otherwise gravitational lenses would be time portals, and so would every other clump of matter.
You have failed to even prove time exists let alone the ability to travel in it. Time is a one way street. No matter what you do to light.
Consider a trip into the future, made commonplace in our world of space travel. As pointed out by J. Richard Gott in his book Time Travel in Einstein's Universe, the Russian cosmonaut Sergei Avdeyev orbited Earth slowly relative to the speed of light but still, traveling a total of 748 days at those speeds: he's about 1/50th of a second younger than he would have been if he had stayed home. He found Earth 1/50th of a second in the future from where he expected to find it. He experienced the future.
Had Avdeyev traveled at 99.995 % of the speed of light, says Gott, to a star about 500 light years away and back, he would have returned to an Earth 1000 years in the future and he only ten years older. He would live in the future from then on.
Originally posted by MolecularPhD
reply to post by Gorman91
Time travel on a molecular level has already occurred and time travel for space tavel appliction (IE, warp), is expected to be possible within this century.
Please site the informational location for this statement; as a Molecular Physicist I have never read this in any peer reviewed journal.
Sincerely
TheGhost
plastic magnet is a non-metallic magnet made from an organic polymer. One example is PANiCNQ, which is a combination of emeraldine-based polyaniline (PANi) and tetracyanoquinodimethane (TCNQ). When it was created by researchers at the University of Durham in 2004 it was the first magnetic polymer to function at room temperature.
PANi is a conductive polymer that is stable in air. When combined with the free radical forming TCNQ as an acceptor molecule it can mimic the mechanism of metallic magnets. The magnetic properties arise from the fully pi-conjugated nitrogen-containing backbone combined with molecular charge transfer side groups. These properties cause the molecule to have a high density of localised spins that can give rise to coupling of their magnetic fields. When a polymer magnet is synthesized, the polymer chains need a long time to line up before displaying any notable magnetism.
Originally posted by MolecularPhD
reply to post by constantwonder
I would love too.
I hold dual PhD’s, one in Molecular Physics, and the other in Material Engineering both of which are from MIT.
Would you like to site where you get your information from?
Sincerely
TheGhost
Originally posted by constantwonder
yes lets get take spelling into account . . . . seriously are you that insecure in your own knowledge that you feel you need to point out spelling errors. . . shows some real genious mate
If you want to debate then debate keep the personal insults out of it. If you want to continue your belligerent tirade etc etc etc
The black hole event horizon is where normal matter (and forces) must exceed the speed of light in order to escape, and thus are trapped. The horizon is meaningless to a virtual particle with enough speed. In particular, a charged black hole is a source of virtual photons that can then do their usual virtual business with the rest of the universe. Once again, we don't know for sure that quantum gravity will have a description in terms of gravitons, but if it does, the same loophole will apply---gravitational attraction will be mediated by virtual gravitons, which are free to ignore a black hole event horizon.
Originally posted by watcher73
Originally posted by constantwonder
yes lets get take spelling into account . . . . seriously are you that insecure in your own knowledge that you feel you need to point out spelling errors. . . shows some real genious mate
Cry me a river. Its ok to call people small minded for whatever reason you think you had but oh my god dont point out the name-callers spelling error.
I think you just really showed who is small minded here.
If you want to debate then debate keep the personal insults out of it. If you want to continue your belligerent tirade etc etc etc
It's amazing how you think you time traveled and erased you calling me small minded to which I responded about your stupid spelling error.
Do I need to go quote it?
Do you frequently insult people and then blame them for giving back?
Are you just mad at yourself for being an atrocious speller with no quantifiable grasp on relativity?
Have you seen in this relativity theory that you keep bringing up that spacetime is usually one word? Its funny that you can claim E and m are interchangeable and completely overlook spacetime as being one and the same.
Time is simply the way we relate to space its not a thing one can travel about.
Relativity only applies when there is more than one frame of reference and it all depends which one youre observing from.
The clocks on satellites tick more slowly because the satellites are travelling faster. Mass increases as you approach c right? If the mass of every single atom in the satellites clock increases would it not tick more slowly than a clock moving at a slower velocity? If you disagree tell me where the extra mass is getting the extra energy to tick along at the same rate as an Earthbound clock.
Time is an illusion. The fact that two very accurate atomic clocks can tick differently when "set" at the same time proves this. The difference is due to mass.
Any other previously unsolved physics quandaries youd like me to tackle?