MSNBC's Ed Schultz: 'If I lived in Massachusetts I’d Vote 10 Times...I'd Cheat ...

Here we have another - not so shocking anymore - example of left wing media bias.

We also see which party is so into election cheating that they no longer feel they even have to try and hide it.

Read the article and watch the video and decide for yourselves:
article and video

ED SCHULTZ, HOST: I tell you what, if I lived in Massachusetts, I'd try to vote ten times. I don't know if they'd let me or not, but I'd try to. Yeah, that's right, I'd cheat to keep these bastards out. I would. 'Cause that's exactly what they are.

[edit on 1/17/2010 by centurion1211]

And the media owner of that BS network wonder why they are loosing their shirt and no ratings. These Libtard talking heads they hire are saying exactly what we thought the Elites wouldn't say before Obommy and his merry men were ensconced. If a conservative or a libertarian said this they would hound them into oblivion!
Zindo

[sigh] I surely wish we would let go of the atificial "liberal/conservative" dichotomy. It is in place to divide us to conquer us.

Any piece that can be labeled "con" or "lib" is a gatekeeper function.

Better to all move in a new direction, as described in my ebook, offered freely in the ATS media site. Link is in my sig.

I'm confused

I thought it was only Fox News and conservative talk radio that were "hatemongers"????

reply to post by WTFover


Question now to me would be.......how many votes did they "buy" to elect " Obama? I mean you admitted it's standard practice.....so how many?

Originally posted by adifferentbreed
I mean you admitted it's standard practice.....so how many?

I'm not really sure how you got that out of my claim of "hatemongering". I was merely referencing the use of the word "bastards", in a hateful manner.

Though, since you asked, I'm sure there are an insignificant number of votes "bought" by both the Rs and Ds, at every election.

Originally posted by ZindoDoone
If a conservative or a libertarian said this they would hound them into oblivion!
Zindo

Of course you are not doing just that...

reply to post by WTFover


I didn't mean you, I apologize if it came out that way, I meant Schultz.....I think this is the first time I've heard something like this admitted on t.v..

reply to post by adifferentbreed


Okay, I understand what you meant, now and that is a very good question. Of course, none of the news media will ask the really tough questions.

He should be investigated.

And if anything is found charges brought up against him for election fraud.

This is one of the most major crimes possible in a so called democracy.

If he can buy votes, than no other laws are valid anymore either. Trust me you do not want that world.

Originally posted by centurion1211
Here we have another - not so shocking anymore - example of left wing media bias.

I will give you whatever you want to say about the actual statement but this is just unfair. Ed Shultz has made it clear that he is a lefty, a liberal, a democrat, and he uses his OPINION show to discuss it. There is no media bias here since you know full well going in that this man will be shooting only from the left.

No I will not even attempt to defend what he said, that is something else.

OK, let me just state that being surprised that anyone on MSNBC is a liberal is about as retarded as being surprised that anyone on Fox News is a conservative! In other words, DUH!!!

This isn't news, nor is it surprising.... It's just another convienent excuse to try to cause division in our own country. Very Nice!

Anyone remember the saying, "United we Stand, Divided we Fall"??? Someone give me a poke just before we go down like the Titanic so I can try to make it to a lifeboat...

Originally posted by JaxonRoberts
Someone give me a poke just before we go down like the Titanic so I can try to make it to a lifeboat...

At this point, I am afraid to inform you all of the lifeboats are gone. Already taken.

We only have one choice now.

Can't change course this late, the iceberg is too close now.

Brace for impact.

[edit on 17-1-2010 by muzzleflash]

reply to post by centurion1211


Of course he would. With the likes of ACORN being the flagbearers of liberal morality, it's only natural for them to try to break every rule to keep their Socialist agendas on track. Truthfully, I have to applaud Ed for telling the truth on what he is capable of doing morality wise to make sure the agendas of his keepers are kept on course.

reply to post by Ferris.Bueller.II


OK, I'll give you that one, but who is the 'flagbearer of conservative morality'??? Larry Craig??? Mark Sanford??? John Ensign??? Ted Stevens???

Just wondering???

Let's face it, both sides reek of hypocracy!!! Are you sure all the lifeboats are already taken???

reply to post by JaxonRoberts


If I was a thinking man, I think I might try to find one of those lifeboats being used by the same asshats, that put the iceberg there in the first place.

Hummm, America has not hope, united we stand divided we fall . . . and that is exactly what pay groups are doing to keep the American people from thinking for themselves.

No matter who wins Massachusetts, we will no be any better than we are today.

Is not about political parties my friends, is about corruption and a system of government that no longer works for the people.

[edit on 17-1-2010 by marg6043]

reply to post by JaxonRoberts


Conservative morality in general, or for the Republican Party?

In general for America, I'd have to say it's Ron Paul.

For the Republican Party, I wouldn't have a clue.

Both the Democrats and the Republicans are just about indistinguishable in today's political environment.

reply to post by Amaterasu


And as you see nobody has responded to your post because apparently it is "fun" to live in the schizophrenic world of "left/right." :shk:

Why can't it just be "Someone said he would cheat if they could." Why does there need to be "left wing" or "right wing?" Does it make doing wrong worse than the other? If it is worse when one "side" does it, is that not in fact tacit approval for the other "side" to go for it?

MSNBC's Ed Schultz said he would cheat. I'm sure someone from CNN, Fox, ABC and the other vile listings of the MSM media that we claim to hate yet stay so tuned-in to are saying something equally offensive. Yet for some reason there are varying degrees of cheating, lying, adultery, theft, and every other moral sin you can think of and people still cling to their "side" while the real world is watching it on every spectrum all around them, wondering if anyone will ever wake up.

I realize some conservatives also say this, too, but a lot of dems are starting to try and hide behind the "there's no difference between the parties", line as more and more of their party's excesses and illegalities are found and exposed for all to see. Clearly there are still major differences - if the right people get elected. You may hate Bush, but who are the sleazy equivalents to Reid, Pelosi, and all the senators currently accepting bribes for their health care votes?

Yes, "there's no difference ..." is becoming just as tedious as all the "I support the troops" BS from dems we used to hear a lot of - when in reality they never lifted a finger to do anything to support the troops.