It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by cma
go to www.kucinich.us
dennis kucinich is the BEST canadate, we need to all ban togather to help.
email me for info.
I believe in a skeptical, probable liberal approach to politics, although the brainwashed public thinks not.
Originally posted by NRAJOE
BUWAAAHAAAHAAAA! Are you on drugs!?
Thats too funny, sad, but funny!
Originally posted by specialasianX
Universla health care, social security, higher funded education and tuition free colledge are great ideas! Why should the rich be able to have the basic while the poor suffer! The problem with the college system in the states, is to get a high paying job, you need to spend alot of money to go to an expensive college. Why should the rich stay rich while the poor dont get a chance. If you earn lots of money you should contribute to making less fortunate peoples lives easier. Thats the problem with conservatives, its all about the individual and nothing about helping the community... another term fot his is selfishness. if i lived in the states i'd vote for this guy.
Originally posted by NRAJOE
Sniff, sniff...now you hurt my feelings...good thing I'm not a liberal or I'd get all wishy washy and start crying....
[Edited on 5/26/2004 by NRAJOE]
Originally posted by NRAJOE
Wow! Your nuttier than all the fruitcake liberals on here. And I thought I was an angry Republican!
Take a chill pill internet intellectual...I got a right to say whatever I want without some wackjob like you insulting me.
Krazy???? You got that part of your name right...WOW!
Eat excrement and expire windbag!
Originally posted by specialasianX
KrazyJethro, i'm not suggesting a fully communist government. What i find unfair is how in the states its the rich guys and the big corporations that get the tax breaks, not the poor who need it. Then the rich guys who run the companies fire 10000 people so they can make a few extra bucks, meanwhile these 10000 people are jobless and may then become homeless while the rich guy buys another ferrari...
First off, this is the unfortunate fact of life in any economic system (even communism). At least here people have a chance to succeed. Although it may seem like this is the reason they fire loads of people, it is not always like that. The whole goal of the company is to make money, not lose it. If they can not stay afloat, then losing 10,000 jobs is better than frying the whole company and losing 400,000 jobs. I think you need to look at the big picture. Tax breaks for corporations, while I disagree with some, are needed to promote business because big businesses have the jobs that pay the salary that pay the taxes.
I have no problem with looking after yourself first and foremost, but i feel it is really unfair to indulge while others suffer.
Perhaps it is "unfair", but is it not equally unfair to take from one who has earned and give to one that has not? Life is unfair no matter what happens, but I would rather get what I earn and choose to help people than to be forced to. That is not what America was built on, nor should it continue down the "wealth redistribution" path.
I feel the more you earn the higher tax you pay.
We do have tax rates here. The more you make, the higher "tax bracket" you are in. People who make under 10,500 a year actually do not have to pay income tax at all. Lower income pay 15 %, above that 21%. Wealthy people pay 35-40% in taxes (which as a percentage is a hell of a lot of money). The wealthy 1% pay more in taxes than everyone else combined.
Also a good system some countries have is they issue fines depending on te income of the person who was fined. e.g I earn AU$40K and i get caught littering. they fine me $100. Bob earns 40 000 000 they fine him $100 000... that to me is fair. coz if they fine bob $100, its chump change to him... but fining him $100 000 would affect him as much as fining me $100... but you conservatives wouldnt understand that concept of fair i guess. all you guys undestand is freedom to serve oneself and not give a # about anyone else.
I think you are confusing freedom with egocentrics. I would rather give to MY COMMUNITY rather than to a bloated ineffeciant federal program. I think my community, our churches (and other Philanthropic groups) and me are better equiped to assess the need in our area. Don't confuse the desire to control our own money and to give as we see the need with indifference and selfishness.
I know there are people on welfare that dont deserve it, but there are ways of leeching them out, and if a man decides to live a life of poverty, why should his kid have a substandard college education? its not his fault he hasnt got a chance. You guys need a government loan system, where when you get a profession you pay the loan back after college.
We have many many programs for people to pay for college. From government grants and loans, to private banks loans (which are plentyful and defer payment until after graduation), and loads of scholarships for all sorts of things. If one wants to go to college, and gets themselves into one, they can find the money to go more often than not.
And maybe i am too young to be corrupted by greed, and hopefully i never get this sort of corruption running through me.
Maybe you are also too young to understand the way we do business over here. Maybe people who think guys like me are selfish should assess how the government of over 300 million could possibly be cost effective in any way for a social program like that which you prescribe to. The entire reason that churches (and other religious orginizations) are tax exempt (completely) is because they help and strengthen our communities and I think we should let them do their jobs while working to build strong connections rather then sending our money off to big brother who will squander 50+% of it on bull# and misappropriations.
I got lots more to say but i've finsihed work now so have fun kids!!!
For a "young guy" I find it hard to believe you are calling others kids.
Originally posted by KrazyJethro
Originally posted by NRAJOE
Wow! Your nuttier than all the fruitcake liberals on here. And I thought I was an angry Republican!
Take a chill pill internet intellectual...I got a right to say whatever I want without some wackjob like you insulting me.
Krazy???? You got that part of your name right...WOW!
Eat excrement and expire windbag!
Insult you? Slug, you insulted yourself with the inane posts. Perhaps you missed the motto of this site. It's "Deny Ignorance" which doesn't lend itself to being a jackass.
I have every right to try to uphold this board from the load of freepers who do nothing but spew crap and make conservatives look like the racist vile sacks that the libs think we are.
And by the way, I may be conservative, but I'll be damned if I associate myself with the Republican party.
The point of this site is to learn and dig through the bull#, which at this point you are propogating on this board. Do you think I don't see new little toads like you come on here every day? Sure I do, and it is the bain of civilized and real discussion (which we used to have since you and your ilk crept in).
You could be an asset to this site if you didn't wander around and think of this as a faceless paradise to do as they do over in Free Republic.
Originally posted by specialasianX
KrazyJethro, i'm not suggesting a fully communist government. What i find unfair is how in the states its the rich guys and the big corporations that get the tax breaks, not the poor who need it. Then the rich guys who run the companies fire 10000 people so they can make a few extra bucks, meanwhile these 10000 people are jobless and may then become homeless while the rich guy buys another ferrari...
I have no problem with looking after yourself first and foremost, but i feel it is really unfair to indulge while others suffer. I feel the more you earn the higher tax you pay. Also a good system some countries have is they issue fines depending on te income of the person who was fined. e.g I earn AU$40K and i get caught littering. they fine me $100. Bob earns 40 000 000 they fine him $100 000... that to me is fair. coz if they fine bob $100, its chump change to him... but fining him $100 000 would affect him as much as fining me $100... but you conservatives wouldnt understand that concept of fair i guess. all you guys undestand is freedom to serve oneself and not give a # about anyone else.
I
And maybe i am too young to be corrupted by greed, and hopefully i never get this sort of corruption running through me.
I got lots more to say but i've finsihed work now so have fun kids!!!