It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by muzzleflash
If a supernova went off anywhere remotely near our Solar System it would have obliterated every object.
Supernova explosions are typically larger than entire solar systems. Thus all planets get totally eradicated.
Therefore, there is no way in hell a supernova went off 150years ago remotely close to us.
It had to be at least 5-10 light years away. That is a safe distance to watch from.
So the explanation fails miserably.
50 BILLION AT 240,000 MPH = 23.5 YEARS
4.7 BILLION AT 20,000 MPH = 27 YEARS
OUR SUN WHIPS BY 486,000 MPH THROUGH THE GALAXY
THE EARTH TRAVELS AT 67,000 MPH AROUND THE SUN.
1987 New Science and Invention Encyclopedia
"One of the more amusing pieces of evidence for the existence of Planet X is a picture from the 1987 New Science and Invention Encyclopedia. In a section on space probes, the encyclopedia shows the paths of the 2 Pioneer probes and illustrates how the probes were used in the search for more planets. It shows the Earth, the Sun, a dead star (at 50 billion miles or 538 AU) and a tenth planet (at 4.7 billion miles or 50 AU).
There are no Communists or Capitalists out in deep Space as far as I know, so I doubt such an object or any beings living near or close to it, would really give a damn for our feelings towards one and other.
One thing can be taken as granted however, if this story of old is indeed truth, then nothing we think about strangers in another country, will or can stop the list of events that will become reality, if it is true, then it is coming, and while we fight and argue, any preparations needed to try and survive, are being neglected by the Citizens of our Planet.
The biggest problem is life is full of surprises like the Web Bot Project computer oracle program predicts a major event in 2012. As you read this, several planets are experiencing global warming. Saturn, for instance, has changed 30 percent. If this had occurred on the Earth, all life as we know it would be gone.
This is not the first I've heard this. Of course the believers will say NASA is lieing and the rest will say their evidence is not credible or accurate.
Though not known to the American people about G1.9 is that since its discovery NASA has continued to maintain that it is the remnant of a supernova explosion that occurred about 140 years ago, an explanation deemed “absurd” by Russian scientists who point out, correctly, that for a supernova to have exploded in our own Solar System in the mid 1800’s it would have been not only visible to the entire Earth, it would have been extensively documented too.
Originally posted by SunnyDee
Though not known to the American people about G1.9 is that since its discovery NASA has continued to maintain that it is the remnant of a supernova explosion that occurred about 140 years ago, an explanation deemed “absurd” by Russian scientists who point out, correctly, that for a supernova to have exploded in our own Solar System in the mid 1800’s it would have been not only visible to the entire Earth, it would have been extensively documented too.
So there is something headed our way, if you believe the spaniarda and russians. Is it possible to figure out it's trajectory, when it might pass by us, meaning between pluto and the sun)
The whole comet hitting Jupiter seemed very undermentioned considering our space agencies are dedicated to tracking these objects and missed this one.
That's only if NASA aren't telling porkies. if this Spanish team have come forward to say different, why shouldn't they be believed? are they not credible?
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by SunnyDee
What's really absurd is the idea that the supernova (or G1.9) was, or is, inside or anywhere near the solar system at all. A supernova would have destroyed the solar system entirely.
G1.9 is not in the solar system. It is 25,000 light years from the solar system.
chandra.harvard.edu...
[edit on 8/3/2010 by Phage]
UPDATE FEBRUARY 19, 2010: -- We patiently waited and monitored the StarViewer Team's web site for the "proof" that claimed would be forthcoming. Needless to say, it never materialized. Also, the initial popularity of their claim appears to have been nothing more than a way to attract a large viewership. The web site now is full of ridiculous claims, including some satirical stories taken from "the onion" (a very funny site) which the SV Team promoted as "real." There is no mention of the mathematical validation that was expected with regards to the G1.9 object. Perhaps the validation disproved their theory... perhaps it was never going to be validated by anyone... I think it is safe to take this theory of object G1.9 being a brown dwarf down to ZERO possibility!
Originally posted by SunnyDee
Did you read the article? It is not a supernova, at least according to astronomers outside the US.
And it says it is some 30-33 AU past pluto, but for whatever reason they reason that that is in our solar system.
Originally posted by Acidtastic
if this Spanish team have come forward to say different, why shouldn't they be believed? are they not credible?