It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MarrsAttax
Yes I agree with Aceofclubs.
There's a difference between looking and leering. Wolf-whistles and bawdy comments are inappropriate but I challenge any straight man not to check out that area when they see a woman. If you're honest I think you'd admit it's almost impossible not to find your eyes drawn to certain areas. Or maybe I'm just a crazy perv
You're right though that there are subtle body language cues that people use to acknowledge assent - I was being slightly flippant there.
BTW I've been with my partner for 19 years, and married for the last 8.
Regarding your first point in the OP personally I find that when I think hard and try to define the meaning of God I'm actually left with nothing at all. E.g. the concepts of Trinity or Transubstantiation where God 'is' three people or bread actually 'becomes' Christ's flesh. What does it mean when someone says 'Yes the bread is still made of bread but it actually 'is' Christ's flesh!' What is the definition of 'is' when something can be two things (or three)? It's like saying 'yes 2+2=4 but really 2+2=5'.
What 'is' God? A spirit? Well what 'is' a spirit.
God 'is' the Universe?
God 'is' Love?
What 'is' the Universe?
What 'is' Love?
Darned if I know.
Hail Eris
Originally posted by Ausar
i find your post self expression;
while god is a concept that is further a commodity to people of whom god is a concept; the originator of the concept of there being one god, unifying all prior temples under the worship of present conceptions of god, is very far from your concept of a changing god and an original idea of a singular force.
while as a man i enjoyed parts of your post; like about admiring what you choose to about the opposite sex: i fail to notice means or ways that this admiration is a "hack". maybe you can expound on some prior to your infusion of this aforementioned word.
since people are always indifferent to god their god is always changing; is this a correct assumption?
but to ask where someones god is is blasphemous to people who hold a true faith of their being a unified god pertaining all the prior temples of worship.a well since people have their own god only they know "its" location.thus the folly of worshiping god in the context of god awareness in present day.
Originally posted by adkchamp
reply to post by EnemyCombatant74
Wow and another one...I'm sorry man but weeks ago i had a guy telling me the same thing, the "hack" that God uses and it's real. I kind of figured there was this "WiFi God" and at times people would say a thing(s) to me and i would go "what?" But i understood them by what they meant and say to myself "How they know?" or "who is he/she?"
Originally posted by adkchamp
reply to post by EnemyCombatant74
i agree
Today everything is about money. Money right now is God to many eyes because we all need it to survive. But that's wrong to put something above a human being in terms of what's important. And it blinds some to see "truth" in others' eyes...