It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
“I do not believe in the God of theology who rewards good and punishes evil.”
“I cannot imagine a God who rewards and punishes the objects of his creation and is but a reflection of human frailty.”
The actions of men can not be used to describe the character of God.
Originally posted by GorehoundLarry
We laugh at creationists because they're absolutely ignorant.
Originally posted by GorehoundLarry
They refuse to look at factual evidence and refuse to agree with science.
Originally posted by GorehoundLarry
Fairy tales are for kids, but these people obviously don't know that.
Originally posted by moocowman
reply to post by trueperspective
The actions of men can not be used to describe the character of God.
Of course they can if it is true that they are made in its' image.
Originally posted by byteshertz
Space can't go on forever as it would need to constantly being created,
new research and discoveries in such fields as physics, cosmology, biochemistry, genetics, and paleontology have caused a growing number of scientists and science theorists to question neo-Darwinism and propose intelligent design as the best explanation for the existence of specified complexity throughout the natural world.
Evidence for Design in Physics and Cosmology
The fine-tuning of the laws of physics and chemistry to allow for advanced life is an example of extremely high levels of CSI in nature. The laws of the universe are complex because they are highly unlikely. Cosmologists have calculated the odds of a life-friendly universe appearing by chance are less than one part in 1010^123. That’s ten raised to a power of 10 with 123 zeros after it! The laws of the universe are specified in that they match the narrow band of parameters required for the existence of advanced life. As an atheist cosmologist Fred Hoyle observed, “[a] common sense interpretation of the facts suggests that a super intellect has monkeyed with physics, as well as with chemistry and biology.” The universe itself shows strong evidence of having been designed. To find out more, read Jay Richards, “Is There Merit for ID in Cosmology, Physics, and Astronomy?” and Stephen Meyer, “Evidence of Design in Physics and Biology.”
nearly all molecular biologists now recognize, the coding regions of DNA possess a high “information content”—where “information content” in a biological context means precisely “complexity and specificity.” Even atheist zoologist Richard Dawkins concedes that “iology is the study of complicated things that give the appearance of having been designed for a purpose.” Atheists like Dawkins believe that unguided natural processes did all the “designing” but intelligent design theorist Stephen C. Meyer notes, “in all cases where we know the causal origin of ‘high information content,’ experience has shown that intelligent design played a causal role.” To find out more, read Stephen Meyer, “DNA and Other Designs” or “DNA and the Origin of Life.”
The myriad enzymes used in the process that converts the genetic information in DNA into proteins are themselves created by the process that converts DNA into proteins. Many fundamental biochemical systems won’t function unless their basic machinery is intact, so how does such complexity evolve via a “blind” and “undirected” Darwinian process of numerous, successive, slight modifications? Since cellular language requires an author, and microbiological machines require an engineer, and genetically encoded programs require a programmer, increasing numbers of scientists feel the best explanation is intelligent design. To find out more, read Michael Behe, “Molecular Machines:Experimental Support for the Design Inference,” or Stephen Meyer, “The Cambrian Explosion: Biology’s Big Bang.
Originally posted by Solofront
What is the dividing line for good and evil?
Originally posted by tribewilder
Originally posted by Solofront
What is the dividing line for good and evil?
My belief is that there is no such thing as Good and Evil, only Love and Fear.
There is no such thing as Right and Wrong...only in the mind of the Observer..
All this talk of where we came from, and non about where we are going.. :shk:
Originally posted by l neXus l
if we are made in god's image, wouldnt that stand to reason god has violent and hateful tendencies? i dont believe either way, just proposing the question
also if god is perfect and we are made in his/her image, then why arent we perfect?
and y would we live on such a chaotic hectic world, that right now closely resembles a hell hole?
[edit on 30-12-2009 by l neXus l]
Originally posted by GorehoundLarry
Although, there is no doubt throughout various galaxies, there are much more advanced beings than us. Do you think they believe their planet is only a couple thousand years old when really it's more than a couple million?
Originally posted by GorehoundLarry
There probably is some cult like institution on their planet that believes so.
Just like there is on ours.
Originally posted by 13579
reply to post by LASTofTheV8s
he only way a God could change the way things are, would be by taking away our freedoms, and MAKING things different. Making us different.
one simple question and please be honest..
Did you ever have the choice to be born?
please be honest..